Category Archives: History

In the divine hierarchy established by God, the man is the builder, the establisher, the governor. He goes out to war, to work, to wrest dominion from the earth by the sweat of his brow. He lays foundations: spiritually, economically, and physically. The woman, by contrast, is called to maintain and enforce the order her husband builds. Her task is not to innovate her own laws or construct her own dominion, but to be a wise and faithful steward of the man’s household and headship.

This is not demeaning—it is glorifying. The wife, when she faithfully fulfills her calling, sustains and beautifies the kingdom entrusted to her. She is like the moon reflecting the light of the sun—she governs the night with the authority delegated to her. She is the queen, upholding the rule of the king.

Let us examine this sacred role through Scripture, through the wisdom of our forefathers, and through the eyes of common sense, now so rare in a society poisoned by egalitarian rebellion.

I. Biblical Foundations: Keeper of the Home

The most fundamental and oft-repeated command given to the wife in Scripture is to be a keeper at home:

“That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.”
—Titus 2:4–5

The Greek word used for “keeper at home” (οἰκουργός) carries a robust meaning—“a guard or warden of the house.” Not merely a passive occupant, the wife is an active maintainer and enforcer of the household dominion. She is a steward, a governor under authority, a domestic magistrate who executes her husband’s law and vision within the sphere of their home.

The man builds; the woman maintains.

The man provides; the woman preserves.

The man establishes order; the woman enforces it.

This is her honor and her duty.

II. The Garden Pattern: From Eden to Household

The pattern of dominion and maintenance is laid down at the very beginning in the Garden of Eden. God placed Adam in the garden “to dress it and to keep it” (Genesis 2:15). After the creation of Eve, she was brought to Adam not to found her own garden, but to help him in the work God had given him. She was bone of his bones and flesh of his flesh—created for the man (1 Corinthians 11:9)—to serve, guard, beautify, and multiply what had already been given.

The fall itself occurred because Eve stepped outside her lane. She began to entertain a vision and decision-making authority apart from her husband’s rule. She failed in her duty to uphold the order given by God through Adam, and chaos ensued. Her punishment included a prophetic return to proper headship:

“Thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.”
—Genesis 3:16

Her redemption would not come through autonomy but through faithful childbearing and submission (1 Timothy 2:15).

III. Enforcing the Law of the Household

One of the gravest errors of modern women is the belief that the home is their “own domain,” independent from the oversight and rule of their husbands. This is false. The husband is head of the wife (Ephesians 5:23), and that headship extends to every sphere, including the home, rules, routines, budget, diet, and child discipline.

The wife is to enforce the laws her husband has set in place. This includes:

Bedtimes for children
Rules of modesty and dress
Household cleanliness and standards of presentation
Sabbath and feast observance
Media access and content restrictions
Chores and responsibilities
Hospitality and guest boundaries
Dietary rules/guidelines

If the husband has declared that no television shall be watched after dinner, the wife is not free to change that. If he has ruled that certain behaviors warrant discipline, she must not turn a blind eye. She must uphold his word, not undermine it. To do otherwise is to act as a usurper within the gates of his authority.

This is seen clearly in the book of Proverbs:

“The wise woman buildeth her house: but the foolish plucketh it down with her hands.”
—Proverbs 14:1

What is it that tears down a house? Rebellion against the husband’s law. Disregard for his vision. Neglect of his provision. Laziness. Gossip. Complaining. Softness with the children when firmness is required. These are not minor infractions; they are betrayals of covenant duty.

IV. Dominion by Delegation: The Stewardship of All That Is Entrusted

The godly woman is not a ruler in her own right. She is a steward, a high-ranking servant within the covenant household, entrusted with dominion that is delegated, not innate. What she oversees is not her possession, but her husband’s estate. What she manages is not her own empire, but his dominion.

This principle must be understood deeply: everything a husband gives to his wife is a sacred trust. She is not the owner of the home, the furnishings, the land, or the provision—she is the keeper, the preserver, the multiplier of that which was delivered to her by her head.

The faithful wife recognizes that to waste what her husband has built is to dishonor and disrespect him, and in so doing, to dishonor Christ, who commands her submission. It is likened to physically slapping him in the face. Her work is not freelance. Her hands are not idle. Her authority is not self-declared. Her role is sacred.

Let us now examine the breadth of her stewardship.

1. The Home: Fortress and Sanctuary

The home is the outward expression of a man’s inward order. It is the sanctuary where his rule is made manifest, where law becomes culture, where peace dwells and truth is taught.

The wife is to guard and maintain the home with holy vigilance. Cleanliness, structure, beauty, and functionality are not luxuries, they are marks of honor. Disorder in the home reflects disorder in the woman. When a wife allows clutter, laziness, decay, or distraction to take root, she is not just being careless, she is allowing the enemy within the gates.

Every room, every corner, every closet is a reflection of the stewardship of the woman. She is called to maintain the home not as a showpiece for outsiders, but as a place of ordered dominion where her husband’s rule is made visible.

“She looketh well to the ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness.”
—Proverbs 31:27

2. Furnishings and Garments: Order in the Details

The beds her husband purchased are to be made. The tables he provided are to be cleared and set. The furniture he supplied is to be cared for with dignity—not stained, destroyed, or buried beneath toys and debris. This is not about materialism—it is about respect.

Likewise, the clothing he provides for his wife and children is to be maintained with diligence. Torn seams should be mended. Laundry should not pile to the ceiling. Stains should be addressed. Shoes should be clean and placed in order.

The Proverbs 31 woman is not a passive consumer, she is a craftswoman, a caretaker, a provider of beauty. Her efforts in these things express her gratitude to God and to her husband.

“She maketh herself coverings of tapestry; her clothing is silk and purple.”
—Proverbs 31:22

3. Garden and Grounds: Dominion Over the Earth

The garden and yard, however large or small—are part of the man’s dominion. Whether a few raised beds or a broad acreage, they are under the wife’s stewardship. A weed-choked garden and a trash-littered yard dishonor the name of the man who pays for that land.

The godly woman will ensure the grass is cut, the flowers maintained, the tools cared for, the trash bins orderly, and the land not neglected. She teaches her children that even the appearance of the home’s grounds reflects the glory of their father.

“She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard.”
—Proverbs 31:16

This is not just busy work. It is visible dominion. It is faithfulness in the little things.

4. Vehicles, Tools, and Implements: Respecting the Man’s Work

The car her husband bought for the family is not a garbage heap. The truck he uses for work is not a playground. The tools he stores in the garage are not toys. Every item her husband has earned by the sweat of his brow must be treated with reverence.

She should ensure that oil changes happen on schedule, that children do not slam car doors or mishandle equipment, that tools are returned to their place, and that vehicles remain clean and ready for use.

A faithful wife will train the children to handle these things properly and speak of them with respect. Why? Because these items are extensions of the man’s work. To lack respect for the items acquired by the husband is to dishonor.

5. Finances and Household Resources: Guarding the Treasury

Every dollar her husband earns represents time away from home, risk, sweat, and toil. The faithful wife does not squander this. She does not waste household money on trinkets, convenience foods, unneeded luxuries, or vanity. She keeps records, stretches each dollar, plans meals, compares prices, shows accountability and multiplies what is given.

“The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.”
—Proverbs 31:11

In the biblical order, the husband is the provider, the household king; the wife is the treasurer, the household steward. She may not generate the income, but she governs its use. She does not spend frivolously. She spends righteously.

She is the Proverbs 31 woman—not chasing careers, but making her husband’s name great in the gates by her industry and faithfulness.

V. Historical Witnesses: Women of Order and Excellence

The vision of a woman as steward, guardian, and enforcer of her husband’s dominion is not merely a biblical ideal—it is a pattern consistently affirmed in the lives of godly women throughout history. In eras of strength, women embraced this sacred charge and preserved the household economy, the moral law, and domestic order with diligence and reverence. Their names are not always remembered, but the civilizations they upheld were built upon their faithfulness.

1. The Matriarchs of Scripture

From Sarah to Ruth, from Hannah to Elizabeth, the holy women of old built nothing of their own name, but magnified the names of their husbands and sons through obedience and faithful stewardship.

Sarah, though married to the great patriarch Abraham, was not known for public exploits but for reverence and obedience:

“Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well…”
—1 Peter 3:6

Rebekah, Rachel, and Leah each submitted to the headship of the men appointed to them and managed the flocks, tents, and children with steadfastness, bearing the future of Israel on their backs.

Hannah’s sacrifice of Samuel was not a detachment from motherhood—it was a fulfillment of her vow to uphold the household’s devotion to God, giving her son back to the Lord in accordance with her husband’s leadership.

2. The Noble Wives of the Reformation

In the time of the Protestant Reformation, when men were risking their lives to preach the gospel and reform the Church, their wives were not idle. They built homes, taught children, cultivated gardens, welcomed persecuted believers, and enforced household law without wavering.

Katharina von Bora, the wife of Martin Luther, managed a complex estate, fed dozens daily, and kept order in a home that was often a refuge for students, refugees, and reformers. Luther affectionately called her “My Lord Kate,” not because she ruled him, but because she ruled the home well under his authority.

She did not seek to lead the Reformation in the public square. She ruled her portion of the kingdom—faithfully maintaining what Luther, her head, had built. That was her glory.

3. The Colonial and Pioneer Women of America

In early America, the homestead was the heart of civilization. Men cleared the land, raised barns, and established farms, but it was the wives who turned rough wood and stone into sanctuaries of peace and law.

These women enforced strict order in their homes: keeping meals on schedule, teaching catechisms, disciplining children, managing livestock, storing food, and maintaining cleanliness even under harsh frontier conditions. Their husbands rode for supplies, went to war, or labored in the fields—often for weeks—trusting that all would be in order upon return.

They were not seeking escape through feminism or employment in town. They had dominion to keep. A fire to tend. A people to govern in the name of their husband and unto the Lord!

4. Victorian and Edwardian Homemakers

Even in the great cities of England and America, Christian wives understood that the home was a moral and spiritual realm to be governed under the man’s headship. Victorian households were marked by schedule, virtue, modesty, and order. The lady of the house enforced the rhythm of the day—prayers, meals, instruction, cleanliness, and decorum.

She was a steward of appearances and behavior, ensuring that what her husband established—socially, financially, and religiously, was preserved, reinforced, and passed on.

The collapse of such homes in the 20th century was not accidental. It came when women left the post of keeper and began to clamor for equal rulership, collapsing the hierarchy that had upheld generations of Christian family strength.

VI. Modern Rebellion and the Decay of Stewardship

The enemy of order is rebellion, and rebellion now wears the mask of liberation. Modernity has sold women a bitter lie: that to serve under a man’s authority is slavery, and that to preserve his house is demeaning. The consequence? A generation of women who despise the very work for which they were created—and homes that lie in ruins because of it.

The home has been traded for the cubicle, the cradle for the boardroom, the garden for gossip, and the order of the husband for the doctrines of feminism. Where once women built multigenerational households under patriarchal authority, now they chase paychecks and political power, leaving the home desolate.

The average woman today cannot sew, cook from scratch, manage a budget, discipline her children, and cannot submit to her husband’s law without complaint. She has been trained to scorn these things—to see the dominion of the household as a prison rather than a throne.

“Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God… Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”
—Romans 1:21–22

Women who abandon their post as keepers of the home do not merely create messy houses, they dismantle civilizations. The household is the smallest unit of God’s kingdom on earth. When it is neglected, the Church is weakened, the nation is corrupted, and the next generation is lost.

The spirit of rebellion has consequences:

Children are undisciplined and defiant.
Homes are disordered, chaotic, and joyless.
Husbands are dishonored and treated as equals—or worse, as burdens.
Finances spiral into debt and dysfunction.
Generations forget the law of God.

This is not a theoretical problem. It is the daily, lived reality of most families in the West. And the solution is not another conference, podcast, or Instagram reel. The solution is repentance. The solution is a return to The Great Order—where men lead in righteousness and women submit in reverent stewardship.

There is no neutral ground. A woman is either upholding her husband’s dominion or undermining it. She is either honoring the law of the house or sowing confusion within it. There is no such thing as harmless rebellion.

Let the women of God renounce the rebellion of our age. Let them cast down the idols of feminism, egalitarianism, and careerism. Let them return home, not as slaves, but as stewards. Not as doormats, but as queens under the crown. And let them raise daughters who do the same.

“Let the aged women… teach the young women… to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home… that the word of God be not blasphemed.”
—Titus 2:3–5

The world blasphemes when Christian women abandon their role. But heaven rejoices when the household is ordered according to God’s design.

VII. Let Her Reign: The Glory of the Faithful Steward

The faithful wife is not a background figure in her husband’s dominion—she is its heartbeat. She reigns not by usurping his authority, but by glorifying it. She extends his law. She enforces his order. She multiplies his provision. And in doing so, she magnifies her own glory, for “a virtuous woman is a crown to her husband” (Proverbs 12:4).

Let no woman shrink from this call. Let no wife despise her sacred role. For the one who maintains what her husband has built is not a servant in chains, but a queen entrusted with treasure.

She reigns when she:

Keeps the home clean, orderly, and peaceful, reflecting her husband’s wisdom.
Disciplines the children with consistency, upholding his authority.
Guards his time, his name, and his resources with watchful diligence.
Respects the furnishings, land, vehicles, and tools he has earned with honor.
Upholds the laws of the household—not with pride, but with obedience.

This is her crown. This is her dominion. This is her offering of praise—not with lips only, but with labor. Not in theory, but in the daily practice of keeping, tending, multiplying, and glorifying what her husband has entrusted to her.

“Every wise woman buildeth her house: but the foolish plucketh it down with her hands.”
—Proverbs 14:1

Let her rise in the strength of the Lord. Let her reject the slanders of a godless age. Let her take joy in her husband’s approval, in her children’s obedience, and in the fruit of her hands. Her work is not small, it is the work of empires, the labor of queens.

Let her speak to her daughters not of careers and competition, but of covenant and stewardship. Let her show them that the path of glory is found in obedience. That the house is not a trap, but a throne. That to be a keeper at home is not to hide from the world, but to reshape it through generational dominion.

And when the world mocks, let her laugh. When fools scoff, let her remember that God smiles on the woman who fears Him. Her reward is eternal, her legacy generational, and her title high: faithful steward of her husband’s house.

“Give her of the fruit of her hands; and let her own works praise her in the gates.”
—Proverbs 31:31

Let the wives arise. Let them keep what has been built. Let them enforce what has been ordered. Let them glorify their husbands by reigning in reverent submission.

This is The Great Order. And it shall not be shaken!

Future, History, Polygamy, Religion, Social Topics

If Your Family (Kingdom/Domain) Is Not Growing, It Is Dying

June 1, 2025 Lord Redbeard 17 Comments

The Biblical Call to Expand Your Household in Wives, Children, Property, Influence, and Dominion

I. Introduction: Life, Growth, and the Nature of God’s Kingdom

In the natural world, stagnation is the first sign of death. A tree that no longer puts forth branches, fruit, or roots is already dying. A river that ceases to flow becomes stagnant and poisonous. A body that ceases to regenerate its cells wastes away. The same is true for the household — the kingdom and dominion of the patriarch.

God’s design for the family is growth. Not merely survival. Not maintenance. Not compromise. But fruitfulness, multiplication, and dominion. These are not optional suggestions but commands given in the first chapter of the Bible:

> “And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion…”

— Genesis 1:28

This command was not revoked. It was reaffirmed to Noah after the flood (Genesis 9:1), to Abraham in the covenant (Genesis 17:6), and to the Church spiritually (Matthew 28:19–20). Growth is the nature of godly dominion. Expansion is obedience. Stagnation is disobedience. Shrinking is rebellion.

Your family is your kingdom. And if your kingdom is not growing, it is dying.

II. The Dominion Mandate: Fruitfulness as Faithfulness

God made man to rule, to build, and to expand. The household was created to be the epicenter of this dominion — a miniature kingdom under God’s greater rule.

The first command to man and woman was not about worship services or fasting rituals. It was about fertility and authority.

> “Be fruitful and multiply.”

This is God’s economy. His Kingdom grows through families, not through governments or programs. The covenantal expansion of God’s people comes through childbirth, headship, marriage, and inheritance.

A man is not faithful merely because he avoids scandal or attends church. He is faithful when he multiplies, when he fills the earth with godly seed, builds an enduring legacy, and structures his household to outlast him for generations.

This means real expansion — in:

Children

Wives

Land and property

Influence

Business and productivity

Generational faithfulness through sons and daughters-in-laws

Protection and headship over uncovered women

Political influence and dominion

Each of these are expressions of the dominion mandate.

III. The Curse of Shrinking Households

Modern households are shrinking. The average Western couple now has 1.2 children. Many Christians sterilize themselves with pride, calling it “wise family planning.” They limit the number of arrows in their quiver because they have conformed to the world’s fear and its idols of ease, entertainment, and wealth.

The result? A dying kingdom. A disobedient household. A sterile future.

> “Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.”

— Psalm 127:3

The man who refuses children is despising God’s reward. The man who refuses to expand his house is refusing stewardship of more inheritance, blessing, and responsibility. The man who resists influence, property, or responsibility is shrinking his domain. Whether he knows it or not, his kingdom is dying.

There is no neutral ground. You are either growing or declining.

IV. Biblical Polygyny: The Engine of Household Growth

One of the most powerful, God-ordained means of household growth is polygyny, the marriage of one man to multiple wives. Far from being a footnote or cultural anomaly, polygyny was a primary tool of expansion among the patriarchs.

Abraham, the father of the faith, had multiple wives and concubines.

Jacob had four wives and twelve sons — the heads of the twelve tribes of Israel.

David and Solomon, kings after God’s own appointment, had multiple wives (though Solomon’s excess in foreign women brought judgment).

Gideon, a judge raised up by the Lord, had many wives and seventy sons (Judges 8:30).

Polygyny, when governed by God’s law, is a righteous vehicle for dominion and growth. Each wife brings the potential for children, productivity, nurturing of future warriors and builders, and the expansion of the household’s legacy.

If a man is able, called, and ordered in righteousness, the taking of additional wives is not indulgence, it is obedience. It is the exercising of holy headship over more ground, more territory, and more fruitfulness.

> “And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed.”

— Genesis 22:18

Seed multiplies through fruitful women. More wives = more seed. More seed = more blessing.

V. Household Expansion Through Generations

A household should not merely expand in the immediate generation — it must be built to multiply generationally.

This happens through:

Daughters-in-law, brought under the household’s law and culture

Grandchildren, raised in the same traditions, faith, and order

Sons, trained to lead, rule, and expand the house still further

The goal is not independence but continuity. Sons do not leave to start autonomous lives; they are trained to inherit and expand the household dominion. The patriarch must think 100 years ahead. He builds systems, expectations, and laws that will remain even after he is buried with his fathers.

> “A good man leaveth an inheritance to his children’s children.”

— Proverbs 13:22

VI. Expansion in Land, Wealth, and Influence

Abraham was blessed not just in children but in flocks, herds, servants, and land. The blessing of the Lord is multi-dimensional. A growing household also acquires:

Property — to establish territorial dominion

Businesses — to create economic strength and independence

Servants, laborers, and allies — to wield greater reach

Cultural influence — to shape communities, cities, and nations

In the biblical worldview, fruitfulness is material as well as spiritual. A household that grows only in theology but not in impact is malformed. God calls for men who multiply both the gospel and goats, both the Word and their wealth.

Even Christ framed the Kingdom in terms of growth and stewardship:

> “For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.”

— Matthew 25:29

The man who multiplies is rewarded. The man who maintains is cast out as lazy.

VII. Providing Headship to the Uncovered

Another vital form of household expansion is taking responsibility for the uncovered — women who are without godly headship.

Scripture is clear: women are not to be autonomous. They are to be under the authority of fathers or husbands (Numbers 30; Ephesians 5:22).

In a righteous society, widows, orphans, or divorced women are not left to drift. They are covered. Brought under headship. Given protection, law, and purpose.

In many cases, a patriarchal man may rightly expand his household by taking such a woman as an additional wife. This is a holy act — not of romance, but of rescue and governance. He provides her law. He disciplines her flesh. He integrates her into a structure she desperately needs, and which she was created for.

> “Let not a widow be taken into the number under threescore years old, having been the wife of one man… If she have brought up children, if she have lodged strangers…”

— 1 Timothy 5:9–10

Paul’s instruction assumes that the Church takes responsibility for uncovered women, but only when no man will. The highest and most fitting place for such a woman is in a righteous man’s house.

A man who is able should not leave women uncovered. He should expand, for their good and for God’s glory.

VIII. The Example of the Patriarchs

Throughout Scripture and history, the righteous men, those who shaped nations and carried God’s promise — were not maintainers. They were builders and expanders.

Noah built an ark, saved a family, and repopulated the earth.

Abraham went out not knowing where he went and became the father of many nations.

Jacob multiplied through wives and sons and became Israel.

Moses led a people and gave them law.

David conquered territory and established a throne.

Nehemiah rebuilt the wall.

Paul planted churches across the empire.

Christ conquered sin and is building His Church.

The God-fearing man is always multiplying. Always expanding. Always thinking in dynasties and dominion. Never content with neutrality or pause.

> “Of the increase of His government and peace there shall be no end.”

— Isaiah 9:7

The kingdom of God increases. So must yours!

IX. Warning Against Shrinking and Excuses

The temptation for the modern man is retreat. He is told to “be content,” to “not overextend,” to “live modestly.” These can be good in context. But often, they are masks for cowardice, laziness, or outright disobedience.

“I can’t afford more children.” — But you trust God to save your soul?

“I’m not sure I could lead more than one wife.” — Then why are you leading at all?

“Our house isn’t big enough.” — Then why aren’t you building a bigger one?

“It’s too hard to manage a big household.” — Then grow up and learn.

God never promises ease. He promises blessing. And blessing follows obedience.

The faithful man expands even in famine. He builds in the face of chaos. He governs when others retreat. He takes headship where others make excuses.

> “And the man waxed great, and went forward, and grew until he became very great.”

— Genesis 26:13

This is the pattern of the patriarch.

X. Let the Righteous Multiply

This is the hour to rise. The time for compromise has ended. Your family is either marching toward dominion or dying in retreat.

Take wives. Raise children. Train sons. Rule over daughters. Bring in daughters-in-law. Gather grandchildren. Purchase land. Build businesses. Influence local Government. Shelter the uncovered. Preach the gospel. Plant orchards. Expand your tent.

> “Enlarge the place of thy tent, and let them stretch forth the curtains of thine habitations: spare not, lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes; For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left…”

— Isaiah 54:2–3

This is the way of dominion.

This is the nature of God’s Kingdom.

This is the legacy of righteous men.

Let the patriarchs rise — and let their houses grow.

If your family is not growing, it is dying. Build, expand, multiply and Reign with Authority!

This is the Great Order!

Health, History, Holidays, Religion, Social Topics

Shavuot: The Festival of Weeks and the Receiving of the Law

May 30, 2025 Lord Redbeard 18 Comments

A Call to Return to the Mount of Covenant

“And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath… even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord.”
— Leviticus 23:15–16 (KJV)

Part I: Returning to Sinai — Rediscovering the Forgotten Feast

Among the appointed times of the Lord, Shavuot, or the Feast of Weeks, stands as a monumental pillar in the divine calendar. It is not merely a commemoration; it is a covenantal summons. A time to remember not only what was given, but to renew what is demanded. Most know it vaguely as the day of Pentecost. Fewer still know its Hebrew origin. And even fewer live as though its significance has never waned. Yet the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob has not changed, and neither have His expectations.

Shavuot is the celebration of the giving of the Law; the Torah, on Mount Sinai. It is the marriage of YHWH and His people. It is the moment when slaves became a nation, when chaos became order, when freedom became responsibility. Shavuot is the mountain of fire, of thunder, of commandments etched by the very finger of God. It is, in truth, one of the holiest days in the Biblical calendar.

And yet, how many Christians today, who claim to love God with all their heart, have no idea what Shavuot even is?

In a world ruled by commercial holidays, pagan customs dressed in tinsel and eggshells, and empty pews echoing with powerless songs, it is time for the people of God to rise and remember. To honor what He has called “My feasts” (Leviticus 23:2). These are not “Jewish holidays.” They are YHWH’s appointed times. We are called to follow His calendar, covenants, and commandments.

Shavuot is not optional. It is an anchor. A flame. A banner of the covenant.

Let us ascend the mountain once more.

Part II: The Biblical Foundation of Shavuot

Commanded by God

The Feast of Weeks is first commanded in the Torah, appearing in multiple places with specific instructions:

“And thou shalt observe the feast of weeks, of the firstfruits of wheat harvest, and the feast of ingathering at the year’s end.”
— Exodus 34:22

“Seven weeks shalt thou number unto thee: begin to number the seven weeks from such time as thou beginnest to put the sickle to the corn: And thou shalt keep the feast of weeks unto the Lord thy God with a tribute of a freewill offering of thine hand…”
— Deuteronomy 16:9–10

These instructions are not vague or symbolic. They are specific and agricultural. From the first Sabbath after Passover, count seven Sabbaths (49 days), and on the next day, the 50th, Shavuot is to be observed. It is the capstone of the spring feasts, the conclusion of the “counting of the Omer,” and the revelation of law after the redemption of blood.

Shavuot follows Passover for a reason: deliverance comes first, then instruction. Freedom is not lawlessness, but rather a transfer of allegiance from Pharaoh to God. The redeemed must be ruled, or they will return to bondage. Shavuot is when that rule was given.

The Giving of the Torah

Shavuot marks the day when God descended upon Mount Sinai in fire and declared His holy law to His chosen nation:

“And it came to pass on the third day in the morning, that there were thunders and lightnings… and mount Sinai was altogether on a smoke, because the Lord descended upon it in fire… and the voice of the trumpet waxed louder and louder…”
— Exodus 19:16–19

This was not a private vision. It was not a whisper in the ear of Moses alone. It was a national event, an audible revelation. The only time in history when an entire nation heard the voice of God together and lived.

“And he declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to perform, even ten commandments; and he wrote them upon two tables of stone.”
— Deuteronomy 4:13

This covenant was not ceremonial. It was moral, eternal, and binding. It defined the nature of righteousness. It codified the law of heaven for earth. It was, and remains; the standard by which nations rise or fall.

Shavuot is the remembering of this giving. It is the renewing of this covenant. And it is a call to keep it.

Law vs. Ceremonial: What Still Applies?

One of the common errors of modern Christianity is to divide God’s law into neat little dispensational boxes and declare whole swaths of Scripture irrelevant. “We’re not under the law,” they say, confusing Paul’s rebuke of justification by the law with the abolition of the law itself.

But Scripture never abolishes the law of God. Rather, it reaffirms it repeatedly:

“Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.”
— Romans 3:31

“For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.”
— 1 John 5:3

There is a distinction, however, between the ceremonial law, such as animal sacrifices, temple rituals, and priestly garments; and the moral and civil law of the covenant. The ceremonial law pointed to the Messiah and was fulfilled in Him. But the commandments given at Sinai, the Ten Commandments and the statutes which interpret and expand them, are eternal.

Shavuot is not a ceremonial shadow. It is not a dead tradition. It is a commanded celebration of the giving of God’s eternal instruction for life. As long as we still need instruction, as long as sin and righteousness exist, then so too does the need for the law. And the day that commemorates its giving is not obsolete, but essential.

Part III: Shavuot in the New Testament – Pentecost and the Spirit of the Law

Shavuot was not abolished by the New Covenant. It was fulfilled in a deeper way, by the Spirit writing the law upon the hearts of the believers.

“And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.”
— Acts 2:1

The word “Pentecost” simply means “fiftieth.” It is the Greek name for Shavuot, celebrated by faithful Jews all over the Roman Empire. On that very day, the day commemorating the giving of the Torah, the Holy Spirit was poured out, and the Law was written upon hearts instead of just stone.

“But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel… I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts…”
— Jeremiah 31:33

“A new heart also will I give you… and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.”
— Ezekiel 36:26–27

Pentecost was not the rejection of the law. It was the internalization of it. The Spirit did not replace the Torah, the Spirit enabled obedience to it.

Thus, Shavuot is both Old and New Covenant. It is the day the Law was given externally, and the day it began to be written internally. It is the marriage of Word and Spirit, and it is as relevant now as it was on the heights of Sinai.

Part IV: The Symbolism of the Offering — Two Loaves and the Firstfruits

“Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals: they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord.”
— Leviticus 23:17

The most peculiar offering required for Shavuot is not without meaning. The two loaves of leavened bread offered during this feast represent a profound spiritual truth, one often overlooked by the modern reader.

In contrast to the Feast of Unleavened Bread, during which all leaven (a symbol of sin) was to be purged, here we find an offering with leaven. Two loaves, both waved before the Lord, consecrated as firstfruits. What does this mean?

These loaves symbolize the two houses, Judah and Ephraim, both offered, both sinful, yet both made acceptable through the sanctifying work of God. They represent the beginning of a harvest, not the fullness of it. The loaves are not perfect, but they are set apart. This is not the end, but the start.

The presence of leaven in the offering reminds us that we are a work in progress. We are not yet glorified, yet we are still presented before God as part of His redemptive harvest. Just as the giving of the Law marked the birth of Israel as a nation, so the outpouring of the Spirit at Pentecost (Shavuot) marked the birth of the Church, both houses united in faith under one King, Messiah Yahusha (Jesus).

The Shavuot offering, therefore, is more than agricultural, it is covenantal. It is not just about wheat and flour, but about people and promise. God is building a kingdom, and the firstfruits are only the beginning.

Part V: Shavuot as a Covenant Marriage Between YHWH and Israel

One of the most powerful themes of Shavuot is that of marriage. Sinai was not just the place where God gave laws. It was the place where He entered into covenant with His people. It was, in effect, a wedding ceremony between YHWH and his people Israel.

“Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people…”
— Exodus 19:5

“And all the people answered together, and said, All that the Lord hath spoken we will do.”
— Exodus 19:8

These words mirror the ancient structure of a betrothal agreement. God declared His intentions, His requirements, and His blessings. The people agreed to the terms. Blood was shed (Exodus 24:8). A meal was eaten (Exodus 24:11). The covenant was sealed.

Jeremiah later confirms this relationship:

“Turn, O backsliding children, saith the Lord; for I am married unto you…”
— Jeremiah 3:14

This covenant-marriage is renewed in the New Covenant as well, not abolished, but extended. In Ephesians 5, Paul reveals that the marriage between Christ and the Church mirrors the relationship between YHWH and Israel. Christ is the Husband, the Head, the Giver of the Word. The Church is the wife, the helpmeet, the one who submits to and keeps the commandments.

Shavuot, then, is not just the giving of law. It is the sealing of a relationship. It is the declaration of headship and submission, of order and obedience. It is the formalization of divine dominion over a people. Just as marriage is the foundation of the household, Shavuot is the foundation of the covenant household of God.

If we do not honor the anniversary of this marriage, then we are like a bride who forgets her wedding day. We forget the vows, the covenant, and we forget the law.

Let us remember!

Part VI: Modern Applications — Why and How We Keep Shavuot Today

Some will ask, “How can we keep Shavuot today? We have no temple. We cannot offer sacrifices. Is this feast even possible?”

The answer is yes, resoundingly so. Shavuot, like all the appointed times, was never only about ritual. It was always about remembrance, renewal, obedience, and rejoicing. While the ceremonial aspects (such as the animal sacrifices and priestly rites) are fulfilled in Christ, the moral and covenantal aspects endure.

Here is how we apply Shavuot today in the context of The Great Order—restoring the Biblical household under divine law:

1. Counting the Omer

Begin by counting the days from the Sabbath after Passover until the fiftieth day. This counting is a spiritual discipline. It builds anticipation. It reminds us that God’s law does not arrive instantly but is sought after diligently.

“Blessed are they that keep his testimonies, and that seek him with the whole heart.” — Psalm 119:2

2. Teach the Law

Shavuot is the season to recommit to God’s commandments. Fathers should gather their households and teach the Ten Commandments afresh. Read Exodus 19–20, Deuteronomy 5–6, and Psalm 119. Instruct sons. Encourage daughters. Review household laws. Reaffirm family order. Let this day renew the household covenant.

3. Gather as Households and Tribes

Though scattered, we are still a people. Gather with fellow believers. If there is no local assembly walking in truth, gather your household alone, but do not neglect the assembly if it exists. Break bread. Pray. Read Scripture. Rejoice.

4. Feast with Rejoicing

Shavuot is a feast! Prepare food. Bake bread. Roast meat. Drink wine. It is a day of covenant joy. Sing songs of praise. Honor the Lawgiver.

“Thou shalt keep the feast of weeks… and thou shalt rejoice before the Lord thy God, thou, and thy son, and thy daughter…”
— Deuteronomy 16:10–11

5. Wave Loaves of Bread

While we no longer present offerings in the temple, we may still wave two loaves before the Lord as a symbolic remembrance. Let the household head present them as a sign of dedication: “We are Yours, O Lord. Accept us as firstfruits.”

6. Celebrate Firstfruits

Give a special offering of the household increase, whether money, grain, garden produce, or goods. Set it aside for the work of the Kingdom. Shavuot is about the beginning of increase.

7. Renew the Marriage Covenant

Let married couples renew their covenant before God. Just as Shavuot celebrates the covenant marriage between God and Israel, so too should earthly marriages be renewed. Men, declare your covering and duty to lead. Wives, declare your submission and support. Teach the children by example.

Part VII: Celebration Ideas for the Household

Here are practical and joyful ways to celebrate Shavuot in your household and community:

Decorate with Wheat and Harvest Symbols: Use sheaves, grain, and firstfruits as visual reminders.
Create a Family Torah Scroll: Have the children help write or illustrate the Ten Commandments.
Host a Torah Reading Night: Invite other families for a public reading of Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 6.
Prepare a Covenant Feast: Include dairy dishes (a Jewish tradition representing “milk and honey”), meat, and fresh bread.
Hold a Firelighting Ceremony: Remember the fire of Mount Sinai by lighting candles or a bonfire at sunset.
Scripture Memory Challenge: Teach children to memorize the Ten Commandments.
Tell the Story of Pentecost: Read Acts 2 and discuss the giving of the Spirit and its connection to the Law.
Symbolic Loaf Presentation: Present two loaves of leavened bread as a household offering to the Lord.

These celebrations are not merely cultural. They are covenantal. They are how we shape a family that walks in divine order. A family that remembers, and obeys.

Part VIII: Shavuot and the Restoration of Dominion

The modern church, having divorced herself from the law of her Husband, wanders in the wilderness without compass or covenant. She has forgotten Sinai. She has despised Torah, and sings of freedom but recoils from responsibility. She waves banners of grace but spits on the very foundation of that grace, the law that defines sin (Romans 7:7) and righteousness (Deuteronomy 6:25).

Shavuot is the antidote to this amnesia. It is the flame that lights the way back to dominion.

The Law and Dominion

Adam was given dominion, but without law, dominion becomes tyranny. It becomes chaos. The law of God is the blueprint for holy dominion. It is the constitution of heaven, meant to be enacted upon the earth. A man cannot rule his house rightly apart from the statutes of YHWH. A nation cannot prosper apart from the commandments of God.

“And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the Lord our God, as he hath commanded us.”
— Deuteronomy 6:25

“Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; and the people whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance.”
— Psalm 33:12

When we keep Shavuot, we are declaring our allegiance not to man-made constitutions, but to the unchanging Word of the King of kings. We are not merely remembering history, we are aligning with His hierarchy, His headship, and His order.

A man who celebrates Shavuot as the receiving of divine law is a man who declares war against humanism, feminism, statism, and relativism. He is a man who says, “As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD” (Joshua 24:15).

This is the kind of man that builds The Great Order.

Shavuot and the National Identity of Israel

Let us speak plainly. The modern church has embraced a globalist lie. She sees herself as disconnected from Israel, despite Paul’s clear teaching that we are grafted into the olive tree (Romans 11), and heirs of the covenants (Ephesians 2:12–13). Shavuot is the perfect litmus test. If a man rejects it, he rejects the covenant that birthed the nation of Israel. He rejects the moment God said, “I take you as My people, and I will be your God” (Exodus 6:7; cf. Exodus 19:5–6).

To restore our people, our households, our dominion, we must reclaim our identity. We are not Greeks, nor Romans, and we are not secular Americans. We are the people of God, a holy nation, we are Israel and subject to her King.

And the King gave us a law.

Shavuot is not just a feast day. It is Independence Day for the righteous. It is Constitution Day for the Kingdom of Heaven on earth. It is the covenant day for the nation under God.

If we want to see restoration; true, lasting, generational restoration, we must begin where the ancient nation began: at the foot of the mountain, where fire met stone, and stone met flesh, and covenant met blood.

A Vision for the Future: Shavuot in a Righteous Nation

Let us imagine it, Lord Redbeard. Let us see it.

A land where every household marks the days from Passover to Pentecost, not with pagan eggs or chocolate bunnies, but with sacred reverence. Where fathers teach their children to count each day in anticipation of the giving of the Law. Where, on the fiftieth day, thousands of Christian families, Bibles in hand, bread loaves on their tables, gather in fields and sanctuaries to hear the Ten Commandments read aloud once more.

A nation where lawmakers write legislation informed by the Law of Moses, not by the whims of degenerates or the trends of democracy. Where education begins with the fear of God. Where national leaders swear fealty not to the Constitution of 1787, but to the unchanging law of the Almighty God.

Where Pentecost is not a day for shouting and falling over, but a day for law and order, for discipline and dominion, for righteous covenantal hierarchy restored.

In this nation, this restored Israel, the household becomes the first government. The father becomes the first lawgiver. The mother, the first teacher, and the family feasts not in idleness, but in thanksgiving for the law that makes freedom possible.

This is what Shavuot demands. And this is what it empowers.

Part IX: Let the Patriarchs Rise at Shavuot

Men of God, this is your charge. Return to the mountain, climb it, take your wife and children with you. Read the commandments aloud in your house. Teach your sons to wield them like swords. Train your daughters to love them like jewels. Let the law be upon your doorposts, your gates, your hearts, your lips.

Shavuot is not for the weak, but for the righteous. It is not for the rebellious, but for the obedient. It is not for the lawless, but for the kingdom-builders, the patriarchs, the priest-kings who govern in the fear of YHWH.

Let this feast be a line in the sand. Let it be the turning point for your household. Let it be the day you stop making excuses and start making disciples. Let it be the moment you bind the commandments to your hands and head (Deuteronomy 6:8), and build your domain on the rock of the Word.

Do not let Shavuot pass like another day, It is not tradition. It is a holy convocation, commanded by the living God, not optional, not spiritualized, not canceled by grace.

You were not saved from Egypt to wander. You were saved to rule!

Final Word: Shavuot is Our Standard

“The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple.”
— Psalm 19:7

“Where there is no vision, the people perish: but he that keepeth the law, happy is he.”
— Proverbs 29:18

The Great Order will not come through politics alone. It will not come through slogans or movements. It will come through households returning to Sinai. It will come through men who reclaim the law, teach it, live it, and celebrate it.

Shavuot is that opportunity. Once a year, every year, God gives us this reminder: I redeemed you by blood (Passover), now serve Me by law (Shavuot). It is the foundation of covenant life.

Celebrate it. Teach it. Build upon it.

Let the fire of Sinai burn in your bones. Let the commandments thunder from your tongue. Let the Spirit write the law upon your heart.

And let every household in your domain say:

“All that the Lord hath spoken we will do.”

Shavuot Celebration Summary for Patriarchs:

Date: The day after the 7th Sabbath following Passover (the 50th day)
Focus: The giving of the Law at Mount Sinai
Scriptures to Read: Exodus 19–20, Deuteronomy 5–6, Acts 2, Jeremiah 31
Symbols: Two leavened loaves, wheat, fire, stone tablets
Practices:
- Count the Omer with the household
- Teach and read the Ten Commandments
- Prepare a covenant feast
- Wave two loaves before the Lord
- Give a firstfruits offering
- Renew marriage and household covenants
- Rejoice with song, Scripture, food, and family
Spiritual Application: Renew your household’s covenant with YHWH; receive again the Law; walk in dominion
Household Theme: “We are the firstfruits of His increase” (Jeremiah 2:3)

Let The Great Order rise again!

History, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

A Vote Against Order: Why Women Were Not Meant to Govern, Or Vote

May 26, 2025 Lord Redbeard 20 Comments

“As for My people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O My people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.”
— Isaiah 3:12

The ballot box has become an altar of modern idolatry. At it, masses gather not to enthrone Christ, but to legitimize rebellion. Democracy, untethered from righteousness, becomes mob rule. And when the mob is led by emotions rather than eternal truth, when the passions of women, ungoverned by male headship, flood the halls of power, we should not be surprised when order collapses and nations descend into chaos.

This is not a minor matter. This is not political theory. This is about authority, order, and the covenantal structure of God’s creation.

I. Biblical Authority and the Principle of Headship

From the beginning, God established a chain of command. Man was made first, then woman (1 Timothy 2:13). Adam was created to lead, govern, and guard. Eve was created as a helper, under his direction. She was not tasked with dominion directly—but with assisting her husband in his calling.

“But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man…”
— 1 Corinthians 11:3

Voting is not neutral. It is not merely a civic act, it is an act of dominion. To vote is to rule, to select leaders, to set policy, to shape the future. This is inherently a masculine duty. In Scripture, all dominion tasks are given to men, eldership, kingship, priesthood, judgment, warfare, governance.

No woman in the Bible was ever called to rule over men. Even Deborah’s brief presence in the Book of Judges is a condemnation, not a commendation. Her leadership came because the men had failed—not because God desired it.

“I arose a mother in Israel.” — Judges 5:7

Deborah did not glory in her authority. She lamented the state of the nation and functioned more as a prophetess than a governor. Her very presence in that role was a judgment upon Israel’s disorder.

II. Voting as an Exercise of Rule

Voting, especially in modern republics, is the mechanism by which the public exercises civil authority. But under God’s order, women were never given this authority, not in the family, not in the church, not in the state.

We are not left to guess what God thinks of women ruling.

“As for My people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them…”
— Isaiah 3:12

This is not a blessing. It is a curse.

Let it be stated plainly: the vote is a symbol of rule. And rule belongs to men. A woman casting a vote apart from her husband’s covering, direction, and headship is a rebellion against this order.

Just as a wife must not usurp authority in the home or church (1 Timothy 2:12), she must not be given political power independent of her husband’s rule.

III. The Historical Witness: Women’s Suffrage and Social Collapse

Let us be clear: the call for women’s suffrage was not birthed in holiness, but in humanism and rebellion.

The 19th and 20th century feminist movements, including the push for the vote, were spearheaded by God-hating, authority-rejecting women like Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Margaret Sanger, who not only rejected biblical womanhood, but also mocked Scripture, promoted sexual libertinism, and sought the destruction of the family as it had stood for millennia.

They knew what they were doing. The vote was not the end goal, it was the first tool. Once women gained the vote, they did not use it to uphold order. They used it to elect leaders who promised security over responsibility, emotion over justice, and entitlement over duty. The welfare state, no-fault divorce, abortion on demand, and the explosion of anti-family policies were all hastened by the female vote.

Statistically, it is well-documented that women, on average, vote more liberally than men. Women are more likely to vote for bigger government, for social programs that reward dependency, and for candidates that appeal to emotion rather than law.

This is not because women are stupid. It is because they are designed to be nurturers, not rulers. Women are created to serve in the private sphere of the household, not the public arena of governance. When they are placed in the realm of policy, war, and judgment—realms that require justice and finality—they are out of place. And the whole nation suffers for it.

IV. What Was Lost: The Era Before Feminist Democracy

Before women’s suffrage, the Western world flourished under Christian civilization. Families were large. Nations were strong. Churches had power. The household was productive. And the woman’s glory was her home, not her ballot.

In Colonial America, Christian commonwealths like Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay upheld God’s law as supreme. Women could not vote, not because they were degraded, but because their role was sacred and protected. They governed their homes under their husbands’ rule. Men bore the weight of lawmaking and nation-building, and women focused on raising future rulers.

This pattern held true across centuries of Christendom. In Geneva under Calvin, in Puritan England, in early America—the vote was a burden of responsibility borne by men who were expected to rule their households well and represent them publicly.

Even in the Roman Republic, voting and office-holding were strictly male responsibilities. It was understood, even by pagans, that a nation could not endure when governed by emotion, sentiment, or soft rule.

V. Practical Application in a Decayed Democracy

We are no longer living in Christendom. The Christian man finds himself now in Babylon, a decaying empire where Jezebel sits in the halls of power and votes are offered to Molech.

In this context, some Christian husbands may ask: Should I allow my wife to vote?

The answer must begin with this: she must not vote as an autonomous individual. If she votes, it must be under your direction, according to your conscience, as your delegate, not as a free agent.

This is not ideal. But we are not in an ideal system. We are in exile.

If a godly husband decides that it is strategically wise for his wife to cast a ballot under his authority, as an extension of his household’s voice in a corrupted system, this is not a violation of headship. This is wartime logistics.

But let no Christian wife imagine that her right to vote is derived from the Constitution rather than the covenant. Her suffrage is not personal, it is patriarchal. And if she votes apart from her husband’s explicit direction and permission, she sins.

Just as Eve should not have dialogued with the serpent without Adam, no Christian wife should engage in political decision-making without her husband’s covering.

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.”
— Ephesians 5:22

VI. Restoring the Household as the Political Unit

Under Biblical law, the household is the basic unit of dominion—not the individual. This is why ancient Israel was organized by tribes and households. Men represented their families at the city gates.

“Her husband is known in the gates, when he sitteth among the elders of the land.”
— Proverbs 31:23

God’s pattern has always been covenantal and familial, not democratic and individualistic. The father, as the head of his house, bears the responsibility to speak, act, and rule on behalf of his wife and children. This includes religious life, economic life, and civil engagement.

The modern individualistic vote atomizes the household, fractures unity, and empowers children and wives to act in rebellion against the father’s leadership. A daughter may vote against her father’s values. A wife may cancel her husband’s vote at the polls. A household becomes a civil war.

This is not the way of the Lord.

In the Great Order, the household speaks with one voice, under one head. Whether in private worship or public witness, the patriarch governs, and the family follows.

VII. Let the Women Return to Strength

To say a woman should not vote is not to say she is weak. Quite the opposite. It is to return her to her proper sphere of dominion: the home. Scripture does not silence women—it dignifies them by placing them where their gifts bear fruit.

“The wise woman buildeth her house: but the foolish plucketh it down with her hands.”
— Proverbs 14:1

Let her build. Let her nurture. Let her train the next generation of rulers. This is real dominion—not illusionary political participation.

The modern woman may boast of her vote, but her home lies in ruins. Her womb is barren. Her children are strangers. Her marriage is shattered. What has the vote gained her? A louder voice in a collapsing civilization.

Christian woman, you are not called to vote, you are called to obey. You are not called to campaign, you are called to build. You are not called to legislate, you are called to labor in love.

Return to your first ministry: the home. Rejoice in your place. Your crown is not political power—it is children, submission, and faithfulness.

“Not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;
But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.”
— 1 Timothy 2:9–10

VIII. The Way Forward: Order in Exile

The Christian man today must walk wisely. He must navigate a hostile culture with clarity and conviction. Though the world has made voting a right, he must remember that his household operates under heaven’s laws, not man’s.

So:

If your wife desires to vote, teach her. Lead her. If permitted, let her vote only in submission to your headship, and according to righteousness.
If you abstain from voting altogether, so be it, but ensure your abstention is principled, not passive.
Train your sons to rule. Teach them that voting is not a birthright but a duty of headship. One day, they will carry the weight of representing your house.
Teach your daughters that their strength is not in influence over men, but in obedience to God and service to their homes.

And above all—build. Build households that defy feminism by their very existence. Build homes where ballots are irrelevant, because God’s Word rules.

IX. Conclusion: Votes Fade—But Order Remains

The vote is a flicker. A civilization may be won or lost at the ballot box, but it is built or destroyed at the dinner table. The true power is in the household. And the household thrives only under God’s order.

Let the feminists rage. Let the statists mock. Let the weak men surrender. We will not!

We are not interested in permission from Washington. We have a mandate from the Word.

Women were not created to rule, but to reflect the glory of their husbands, to nurture life, and to model godly submission.

Let the households of God stand tall once more, with fathers who rule, mothers who build, and children who obey.

Let the Great Order rise again!

“He that ruleth his house well, having his children in subjection with all gravity… For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?”
— 1 Timothy 3:4–5

Soli Deo Gloria.

Conspiracies, History, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

The Real Pay Gap: How Men Labor While Women Reap

May 22, 2025 Lord Redbeard 30 Comments

“In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground…”
— Genesis 3:19

For decades, the feminists have wailed their favorite grievance: the “gender pay gap.” They have weaponized a misleading statistic—that women make “77 cents on the dollar” compared to men—and turned it into a battering ram against patriarchy, biblical order, and masculine dominion.

But like most feminist talking points, this one withers under the heat of Scripture, truth, and reality.

The truth is this: there is no unjust gender pay gap. What we find, instead, is a work gap, a risk gap, and a responsibility gap—and in each case, it is men who bear the burden. Men work longer hours, take more dangerous jobs, build and maintain the infrastructure of civilization, and carry the weight of provision. And yet, the modern system subsidizes, privileges, and protects women in the workforce far beyond what their labor merits.

The so-called “gender pay gap” is not a sign of oppression. It is a manipulated statistic used to justify rebellion against God’s order.

Let us examine this issue through three lenses:

I. Scripture and the Created Order

Men Are Called to Toil, Provide, and Rule

From the beginning, God assigned the burden of labor to man:

“And unto Adam he said… cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life… In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread.”
— Genesis 3:17–19

It was to Adam, not Eve, that God gave the curse of toil. It was the man who was to labor, bleed, and bear the weight of provision. The woman, in contrast, was assigned the domain of home and childbearing:

“Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children…”
— Genesis 3:16

In God’s design, man goes out to provide and protect. Woman stays in, to nurture and build the household. This division is not oppressive—it is ordered, sacred, and life-giving.

The modern attempt to drag women into male roles—into combat, coal mines, skyscraper construction, and executive boardrooms—does not liberate them. It degrades them. It robs both man and woman of their glory.

Wives Are Not Independent Providers

The Proverbs 31 woman is often cited by egalitarians as a model of female entrepreneurship. But what they forget is this: she operates under the covering of her husband.

“The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her… She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard.”
— Proverbs 31:11, 16

Her industry is not rebellion—it is aligned with her husband’s house. She does not have a separate career or independent economic identity. She is fruitful within the household economy.

She does not march into the world demanding equal pay. She builds for her family, under headship.

II. The Myth of the Wage Gap

What the Numbers Actually Say

The 77–82 cent statistic often cited in media reports is not a comparison of men and women doing the same jobs for the same hours. It is a raw average across all jobs, hours, choices, and experience levels.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), when controlling for hours worked, experience, occupation, education, and other relevant factors, the gap shrinks to less than 5 cents, and in some cases, women earn more than men in comparable roles.

Research from Harvard University economist Claudia Goldin—no friend of patriarchy—acknowledged:

“Much of the gender pay gap is the result of differences in work experience, job flexibility preferences, and occupation, rather than overt discrimination.”

Translation: women choose different careers. They work fewer hours. They prioritize family, flexibility, and stability. And they get paid accordingly.

The problem is not injustice. It is that women are not men—and thank God for that.

Women Are Paid More Than They Should Be

Far from being oppressed, many women are overpaid, coddled, and favored by HR departments eager to hit “diversity” quotas.

A 2023 study by Glassdoor found that in many industries, women now out-earn men when comparing younger workers or new hires. Fields like healthcare administration, social work, and education show female advantage in both pay and promotion.

And when benefits, time off, and job perks are included, the picture gets worse.

Women:

Take more sick days (and get paid for them)
Use more maternity leave (often fully paid)
Work fewer overtime hours
Refuse dangerous or strenuous tasks
Are less likely to relocate for work

Yet they are often shielded from layoffs, promoted faster, and praised more loudly—for less risk and lower output.

This is not equality. This is preferential treatment.

III. Men Do the Dirty Work of Civilization

Who Builds and Maintains the World?

The world women live in—safe, structured, and supplied—is built by men.

Consider these fields:

Construction: 90–95% male
Electricians: 98% male
Plumbers: 97% male
Oil and Gas Workers: 95%+ male
Garbage Collectors: 99% male
Roofers, Welders, Truck Drivers: 90%+ male

These jobs are physically taxing, dangerous, and often thankless. Men die in mines, fall from scaffolds, suffer in trenches—not because of oppression, but because they are obeying the mandate to labor and provide.

And while women demand “equal pay,” few demand equal risk.

You will not find feminist protests demanding inclusion in sewer repair, high-rise window cleaning, or long-haul trucking.

Women want equal reward, but not equal sacrifice.

Death and Injury on the Job

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics:

93% of workplace fatalities are men
Men account for the vast majority of serious injuries, chemical exposure, falls, burns, and machinery accidents

Men die at work so women can sit at climate-controlled desks writing articles about how unfair it is.

This is not justice—it is mockery.

IV. The Feminization of the Workforce

Women in Positions They Should Not Hold

As the feminist regime pushes women into every sector, we are witnessing a tragic devolution of work:

Police departments now hire petite women who cannot physically subdue a violent suspect.
Military branches lower physical standards to accommodate female recruits.
Corporate boards select women for “gender balance,” not merit.
STEM programs receive millions in incentives to boost female enrollment—often at the expense of more qualified men.

This is not competence. This is chaos.

And when things collapse—when the power grid fails, or the rioters breach the gates—it will not be the HR specialist or the DEI officer who restores order. It will be the men, with shovels and guns, returning to do the job they were always called to do.

A Return to Biblical Division of Labor

The answer is not for women to be “paid more.” The answer is for women to return to the sphere where they are most powerful: the home.

“That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home…”
— Titus 2:4–5

The house is a kingdom. The wife is a queen—not of commerce, but of nurture, beauty, and order. She governs her children. She blesses her husband. She builds generational strength.

Let the man go to the field. Let the woman tend the hearth. This is not oppression. This is the Great Order.

V. Historical Context: The Household Economy

Before the Corporate World

In pre-industrial society, men and women worked together, not in separate economic spheres. A man might be a farmer, a blacksmith, a baker—and his wife would assist, manage, and contribute as part of the household economy.

But she did not have a “career.” She did not “negotiate her salary.” She built alongside her husband and trained daughters to do the same.

Even in the early 1800s, most women worked at home, not for strangers. The Industrial Revolution, and later, World War II, lured women out of the household and into factories. The state encouraged it. The corporations rewarded it. And the family collapsed.

The Result of Two-Income Households

What have we gained?

Broken homes: Dual-income families mean less time, less unity, less order.
Struggling men: Young men are displaced, under-employed, and depressed.
Higher costs: Inflation adjusted to double incomes—so now it requires two incomes just to survive.
Weakened faith: Church attendance, family worship, and Christian education suffer.

The world told women to “lean in.” And they did. Right off a cliff.

VI. Where Do We Go from Here?

Men Must Lead, Not Compete

Christian men must stop arguing with feminist logic. Stop trying to “prove” your worth in a rigged system. Stop competing with your wife for income and status.

Rule your house. Provide for your own. Lead with quiet strength.

“But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.”
— 1 Timothy 5:8

Your worth is not in your salary. It is in your stewardship.

Women Must Return Home

If you are a Christian woman reading this, hear this in love:

You were not made to compete with men. You were not made to chase titles, careers, or paychecks. You were made to build a home. To nurture life. To serve God under the headship of a righteous man.

You may earn less. But you will build more.

Let your work be eternal, not transactional.

The Church Must Repent

Many churches have accepted the feminist framework. They praise “working moms,” promote “career ministries,” and boast about “female leadership.”

But the fruit is bitter.

The Church must return to preaching headship, submission, and household dominion. The Church must honor the mother at home as much as the missionary abroad.

Conclusion: There Is No Pay Gap—Only an Order Gap

The lie of the gender pay gap is a smokescreen. It hides the deeper issue: rebellion against order.

Men were made to work and bleed for their homes. Women were made to nurture and beautify their homes. When each walks in obedience, the fruit is peace, strength, and joy.

But when women usurp male roles, and men become passive or resentful, the result is confusion.

There is no wage gap that submission and dominion won’t fix.

Let the feminists rage. Let the government subsidize rebellion. Let the world fall deeper into delusion.

We will build households where men provide, women nurture, and the economy is not built on dollars—but on faithfulness.

Let the Great Order rise.

Soli Deo Gloria.

History, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

She Shall Not Go Out Alone: The Biblical Mandate for Female Guarding

May 14, 2025 Lord Redbeard 17 Comments

“Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”
— Genesis 2:24

“For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and He is the saviour of the body.”
— Ephesians 5:23

In this rebellious age of self-assertion and female autonomy, the biblical household finds itself under siege. No doctrine is more scorned than headship. No principle more despised than the godly husband’s right and responsibility to guard his wife.

Modern society prizes what it calls “freedom” — by which it means unaccountability, detachment, and the rejection of authority. It champions the “independent woman” who comes and goes without consultation, who maintains separate relationships, and who “needs space.” But this is not God’s design. This is disorder. It is a breach in the wall.

Let the feminists howl. Let the world mock. Let even the church recoil. Yet let the righteous man stand unmoved by their storm. For the Scriptures declare plainly: the woman is not to go out alone. She is not to have a private world. She is not to maintain independent lines of communication. Her head is her husband — always, everywhere, in all things.

This is not control. This is covenantal covering. This is love in strength. This is divine architecture.

I. The Principle of Male Guardianship: Built into Creation

From the beginning, woman was not made to stand alone. She was not made to roam or lead or govern herself. She was made from man, for man, and under man.

“Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.”
— 1 Corinthians 11:9

She was brought to him — not released into independence. From her creation in Eden to her bearing of children, she is defined relationally, vocationally, and spiritually by the man she is given to. And what is the husband’s role in this order? To protect, guard, and govern.

When Adam failed to be present, when he let the serpent speak to Eve unobserved, unchecked, unchallenged, sin entered the world. Eve should not have been alone. She should not have been speaking with another. She should have been with her head, under his watch, in his presence.

The lesson is eternal: when the woman wanders, the serpent speaks.

II. Scriptural Pattern: Women Are to Remain Within the Household Sphere

“That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,
To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.”
— Titus 2:4–5

The Word of God is clear: young women are to be keepers at home — not travelers, not social butterflies, not independent agents.

The Greek phrase here translated “keepers at home” (oikourous) literally means house-guardians — implying not only physical location but focus and commitment. The woman’s realm is the home. Her loyalty is to the household. Her physical and relational movement is to be governed by her husband’s will, not her own.

When Rebekah became Isaac’s wife, she was brought into his tent (Genesis 24:67). When Ruth followed Naomi, she did not operate alone in the fields — Boaz specifically charged the men not to touch her, and the servant supervised her gleaning (Ruth 2:8–9).

In no case in Scripture do we see godly women going about alone, forging their own connections, or initiating private relationships — especially not with men. Where that occurs, disaster follows.

Think of Dinah, the daughter of Jacob.

“And Dinah… went out to see the daughters of the land.”
— Genesis 34:1

This small act of independence — “just going out” — led to her defilement by Shechem and the eventual bloodshed of the entire city. Dinah should not have gone out. She should have been kept. She should have remained under the eye of her father and brothers. But she left the walls of order, and chaos followed.

III. Communication Is Presence — The Husband Must Be Included

In our modern digital age, we must understand that communication is presence. Texting, messaging, and private conversations with others — even family and friends — carry the same spiritual risks as physical absence.

Just as a wife should not be wandering the streets without her husband, so too should she not be carrying on private messages, unchecked emotional exchanges, or long conversations without his oversight.

“Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak… and if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home.”
— 1 Corinthians 14:34–35

Though this instruction concerns public worship, it reflects a broader principle: when a woman desires to speak or ask, she is to go through her husband. Not pastors, not friends, not family. Her voice is heard through him. He is her covering.

This extends to online platforms, phone calls, and texts. No communication should be shielded from her husband. There is no righteous secrecy in marriage. Her husband must have unfettered access to all messages, all social media, all points of contact.

Why? Because Eve speaks to the serpent in the absence of Adam.

It begins with “harmless” conversation. It ends in ruin.

IV. Historical Witness: Women Were Kept and Guarded

Throughout church history and in nearly every righteous civilization, women were not allowed to come and go freely. Their movements were tied to their husbands or fathers. This was not oppression. It was protection — and it was honored.

In ancient Israel, women were generally only seen in public under the oversight of their male head.
In early Christian society, it was scandalous for a woman to speak to men alone or appear in public without headcovering and male escort.
During the Reformation, the role of the wife was renewed as “lady of the house,” not “citizen of the world.” Her place was the hearth, not the marketplace.
In Puritan England and Colonial America, godly homes required the wife to remain within the sphere of the household, her communications under her husband’s watch.

It was only with the rise of Enlightenment humanism, feminism, and industrial capitalism that the idea of a “free-roaming woman” took root — a departure that has led to divorce, adultery, rebellion, and societal collapse.

Freedom outside of God’s order is not liberty — it is lawlessness.

V. Theology of Dominion: The Husband Is Governor Over His Wife’s Movements

The man is king and priest of his home — but he is also governor.

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.”
— Ephesians 5:22

Submission is not partial. It does not pause when the husband is not physically present. It does not cease in online spaces. The wife’s will is not her own. Her body, her words, her footsteps, and her affiliations are all under the jurisdiction of her lord.

“Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well.”
— 1 Peter 3:6

What would it look like today for a woman to call her husband “lord”? It would look like her not texting others without him reading it. Not going to the store without his knowing. Not receiving counsel or comfort from her mother, sister, or friend before seeking his voice.

This is not insecurity — it is the very essence of covenantal fidelity.

A wife does not exist as an individual in the modern sense. She is one flesh with her husband. Her identity is derived. Her decisions are derivative. Her presence is his presence, and when he is not there physically, his authority must be spiritually and functionally present.

VI. Warnings from the Collapse of Female Guarding

The fruits of female autonomy are rotting on the tree. Consider what happens when wives wander without oversight:

Adultery begins with unguarded access.
The woman who flirts emotionally with a coworker, chats late at night online, or meets someone “just to talk” has already left her head. The serpent has entered the garden.
Family bonds erode.
Wives who retain secret friendships with relatives — often undermining their husbands — divide households. This is how mothers-in-law gain access, how sisters plant doubts, how rebellious daughters spread infection.
Her loyalty fractures.
If a wife can speak freely with others, apart from her husband, she will eventually serve two masters. Her ears will bend toward others. Her thoughts will be split. Her spirit will drift.
The household loses its wall.
Proverbs says a woman who does not remain at home is like a city broken down without walls (cf. Proverbs 25:28). The strength of the home lies in the guardedness of the wife.

VII. But What About Emergencies, Ministry, and Hospitality?

Some may ask, “Is it always wrong for a woman to leave the house alone?” Not necessarily. There are times when a wife may go about — but it must always be:

With her husband’s explicit blessing,
For a clearly defined purpose,
Within a fixed time and covered accountability,
And with a heart that longs to return home.

Just as a soldier may leave the walls of the city on assignment but not in desertion, so too may a wife step outside for a season — but never as a wanderer.

And ministry? Hospitality? These, too, are under his governance. The wife does not entertain others, serve others, or engage others apart from her lord’s knowledge and participation. Even the Proverbs 31 woman — often misquoted to justify female independence — acts within the sphere of her husband’s trust, “The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her” (Proverbs 31:11).

Her strength is not in autonomy — it is in order.

VIII. A Word to Wives: Your Safety Is in His Covering

Dear daughter of Zion, understand this: your husband’s watchfulness is not a prison — it is a fortress. His presence, his eyes, his hand, his access — these are your security. They are not limits to resist. They are gifts to embrace.

“He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust.”
— Psalm 91:4

This is the image of godly headship. A protective, holy presence. Like Boaz to Ruth. Like Abraham to Sarah. Like Christ to the Church.

The moment you desire independence, secrecy, or “space,” the serpent is already whispering. Stay within the wall. Delight in your covering. Let no message, no call, no visit, no outing escape your husband’s view. Your purity depends on it.

IX. Let the Great Order Be Restored

We are not called to conform. We are called to rebuild the ancient ruins. To restore the old paths. To reestablish the boundaries our fathers once set. The principle of female guarding — of the wife never being alone or unaccounted for — is not a minor tradition. It is a foundation stone.

“Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.”
— Proverbs 22:28

The Great Order demands it. The war on Christian civilization will not be won with partial obedience. Let our homes be fortified. Let our wives be shielded. Let our daughters be trained to love the presence and protection of their future heads.

We do not need more free-roaming women. We need kept women. Covenant women. Covered women.

Conclusion: The Woman Shall Not Go Out Alone

Let it be said without apology: A wife has no righteous business outside her husband’s knowledge, covering, and presence. She is not to go out alone. She is not to communicate alone. Her life is not her own — it is bound to the man God gave her, as his helpmeet, under his governance.

This is not bondage. It is glory.

This is not weakness. It is honor.

This is not patriarchy gone too far. It is patriarchy finally applied.

Let the home be guarded. Let the wife be covered. Let the serpent find no opportunity.

Let the Great Order rise.

Future, Health, History, Holidays, Politics, Polygamy, Religion, Social Topics

Announcing the Forthcoming Release of “The Great Order” by Lord Redbeard

May 14, 2025 Lord Redbeard 9 Comments

Bold Foundations for Biblical Patriarchy, Masculinity, and Household Dominion

> “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?”

— Psalm 11:3

We stand at the precipice of a collapsing world. The nations rage, the families crumble, the church is compromised, and the people groan under the weight of disorder. Men are passive, women are rebellious and children are untamed. The covenantal design of God’s order has been all but forgotten.

Yet from the ashes, a trumpet has sounded. A clarion call not of man’s wisdom but of divine truth — bold, ancient, and uncompromising.

That trumpet is The Great Order.

This book is not merely a work of writing. It is not a collection of random thoughts. It is a declaration. One forged through the fires of spiritual warfare, personal experience, obedience, and relentless pursuit of the Kingdom of God.

And now, by the providence and grace of the Most High, it is almost here.

A Work Birthed in Fire and Revelation

There are books that entertain, books that educate and books that simply pass the time. The Great Order is none of these. This is not a journalistic commentary on the state of the culture. This is not a casual opinion piece about the family.

This is a blueprint for dominion!

Every word in this book has been wrought through struggle, failure and triumph. Each sentence has been borne through prayer, sharpened through Scripture, and written through conviction. I did not merely choose to write this book, I was compelled, burdened and gripped by the Spirit of God with a vision too weighty to ignore.

> “The word of the Lord was in my heart as a burning fire shut up in my bones…”

— Jeremiah 20:9

I have lived these words, while often failing. I have been humbled by them, corrected by them, and built by them. They were not written in an ivory tower but forged in the trenches of real fatherhood, real household government, and real spiritual war. The Great Order is not theoretical, it is incarnational. It is truth that has been lived, tested, and proven by patriarchs since the beginning of written history.

This book has not been filtered for cultural acceptance. It has not been softened for fragile ears. It is a sword, a plumbline, a trumpet blast for men to rise, women to embrace sacred roles, and families to become embassies of heaven.

Why This Book Is a Threat to the World and a Balm for the Faithful

The world hates order, it mocks patriarchy, it despises submission and tears down hierarchy. This is no accident, Satan’s war has always been against God’s design. At the heart of that design is the household, governed by man, under Christ, filled with fruitful labor, and advancing the Kingdom through generations.

The Great Order is a threat to every demonic stronghold because it restores the very structure the enemy fears most,the Biblical family.

But this book is more than just a rebuke of the present. It is a balm for the faithful, a comfort to the remnant, a light to those wandering in the darkness of feminism, fatherlessness, and confusion. Many have felt the stirrings in their soul that things are not right, that the modern way is broken and that there must be more.

This book puts language to what the Spirit of God has already whispered in many hearts. It is a framework, a vocabulary,a standard.

In a generation that knows the truth instinctively but lacks the words to defend or articulate it, The Great Order gives voice to the righteous yearning buried in every God-fearing man and woman. It bridges the gap between conviction and communication, between the groaning of the soul and the clarity of truth.

Truths We Know But Cannot Articulate — Until Now

There are times when a man knows something is wrong, even though he cannot explain it. He sees a woman preach, and something in him recoils. He watches a child disobey his mother, and he feels disgust, he sees a home led by a career-focused wife and feels instinctively — this is disorder.

But if pressed, he cannot explain it. He cannot defend it, he cannot express it to his wife, to his children, to his church, to his peers. The conscience bears witness to God’s design. But the vocabulary has been stolen.

This is the plight of our generations, men and women raised without the theological framework or historical wisdom to articulate what they sense in their souls. We know disorder when we see it. We feel its destruction, but we have been robbed of the language to name it, and the courage to confront and profess it.

The Great Order restores that language. It articulates what you’ve always known, it puts steel in your spine and precision in your mouth. It enables fathers to teach their sons, it enables husbands to lead their wives, and enables shepherds to guard the flock. This book is not abstract, it is accessible, practical, and potent.

It accomplishes the seemingly impossible: giving form to formless conviction, giving words to what was once only felt. It is the bridge between inner clarity and external boldness.

IV. The Structure of the Great Order: A Manual for Reconstruction

This is not a book of feelings. It is not a devotional. It is a war manual.

The Great Order is organized into chapters that walk step-by-step through the rebuilding of Christian civilization:

Biblical Patriarchy — restoring God’s government in the home.

Masculinity — dominion, not indulgence; strength through sacrifice.

Christian Polygyny — a weapon of revival and fruitfulness.

The Role of Women — sacred submission, homemaking, and generational building.

Family Government — fathers as kings, priests, and judges.

Household Economy — families as productive units, not consumers.

Education — indoctrinating children in righteousness.

Resistance — rejecting feminism, statism, and cultural apostasy.

The Church and the Household — integrating worship and dominion.

It doesn’t simply teach why we must return to Biblical order, it shows how. It is intensely practical, designed to be implemented. The principles in this book already form the foundation of households that have rejected compromise and chosen to live by the Law of God.

The Fruit of the Great Order: Revival, Peace, and Restoration

Revival will not come from stadiums, celebrity pastors, or emotional altar calls.

Revival begins at the dinner table!

It begins when a man takes his place as head of his home. When a woman repents of autonomy and embraces her role with joy. When children are trained in obedience, fear of God, and discipline. When homes become churches, the Sabbath is kept, and Scripture governs life.

The Great Order is not just about family. It is about national restoration.This book declares what few are willing to say: that peace cannot come until patriarchy is restored. That harmony cannot come until hierarchy is obeyed. That blessing cannot come until the household is ruled by God’s order.

This is not nostalgia, politics, or moralism, this is covenantal. When men obey the order of heaven, the result is peace on earth.

Children flourish.

Wives rejoice.

Men lead.

The poor are cared for.

The land is healed.

The nations tremble.

This is how we rebuild civilization — not by electing the right leaders, but by raising them in our homes.

A Book for the Centuries to come:

The world writes books for entertainment, and the church writes books to sell but The Great Order was written to last, to stand the test of time.

This is not a trending topic, but a timeless template. It will be as relevant in five hundred years as it is today, because it is built on eternal truth. As long as the Word of God stands — and it will stand forever, this book will be a plumbline for the faithful.

When governments fall, the households guided by this book will remain!

When seminaries apostatize, the sons trained by this book will become shepherds!

When feminism collapses, the daughters raised by this book will rebuild homes!

The Great Order is not a one-generation manual. It is a multi-generational standard. It is written to be passed from father to son, from elder to disciple, from patriarch to patriarch. It is the blueprint for God’s covenant people to restore the ancient paths (Jeremiah 6:16). This book will outlast trends. It will outlast empires. Because it is built on the Rock.

Who This Book Is For

This book is not for everyone. It is not for cowards. It is not for cultural Christians. It is not for women who want to control men or men who fear responsibility.

This book is for fathers ready to rule their homes, wives ready to be crowned with honor,

sons ready to build legacies, daughters ready to prepare for homemaking. It is for shepherds ready to reform their flocks, remnant believers ready to live counter-culturally, and seekers ready to repent and submit to God’s order.

If you are tired of the lies. If you know there’s more. If you feel the conviction but lack the clarity. If you want to plant trees under whose shade your great-grandchildren will sit — then this book is for you.

What to Expect in the Coming Release

The release of The Great Order will be more than a publication. It will be a launch. A declaration of war. A rallying point for households across the earth who are tired of compromise and ready to build.

The book will be released in softcover initially, with hardcover, audiobook, and digital formats planned for the near future. This is more than a book. It is a movement.

The website LordRedbeard.com will serve as the command center — featuring articles, updates, resources, and an ever-growing library or resources for covenant households.

Let the Patriarchs Rise

We are not waiting for revival, we are building it. We are not waiting for the world to wake up, we are establishing households that shine as light in the darkness. We are not waiting for permission, we have a mandate.

God is raising up a remnant of men — fathers, brothers, sons — who will not bow to Baal. They will not kneel to feminism, and will not compromise with the world.

They will build, marry, multiply and they will reign!

And when the Lord returns, He will find not a scattered, weak, feminized people — but an ordered people. A governed people. A glorious bride.

The Great Order is the trumpet.

The time for excuses is over.

Let the patriarchs rise.

Let the women rejoice in their submission and glory.

Let the children be trained as arrows.

Let the households become kingdoms.

Let the dominion begin.

Are you ready?

The Great Order is coming, get your house ready, train your sons, teach your daughters, insure that your name is found among the builders!

Prepare your household, clear your calendar, sharpen your mind and fortify your heart.

The time has come.

The standard has been raised.

The restoration has begun.

Let the Great Order rise and be restored!

Soli Deo Gloria.

History, Politics, Social Topics

Why a Woman Must Always Be Under Headship: The Unbreakable Design of God

May 12, 2025 Lord Redbeard 16 Comments

Modern Christianity has adopted many lies, but none more destructive than the idea that a woman can, and should, be autonomous. The culture prizes the “independent woman.” The church parrots the same mantra in softer tones. But Scripture knows nothing of this. God never created women to stand alone. She was made for order, and she flourishes under headship.

A woman is required by God to be under male authority at all times, from her father’s house, to her husband’s house, and in some cases under the governance of church elders. This is not optional. It is not conditional. It is not a matter of preference. It is a covenantal design, etched into creation and enforced by divine command.

“But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man…”
— 1 Corinthians 11:3

This structure is not cultural, it is creational. It is not bondage, it is blessing. And when it is violated, chaos, heartbreak, and destruction follow.

I. Headship in Creation: Woman Was Made for the Man

We must begin where God begins: in Genesis. Adam was made first, formed from the dust by the breath of God. He was given a mission—to take dominion. But God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” (Genesis 2:18)

The woman was not made as a co-leader. She was not designed as an independent entity to explore her identity. She was made for the man, from the man, and to the man.

“For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.”
— 1 Corinthians 11:8–9

This is the creation order, and it never changes. A woman, by nature and design, must be under the loving rule of godly headship. When she is, she is protected, fruitful, and secure. When she is not, she is vulnerable, unstable, and easy prey for deception.

This is not conjecture. This is exactly what happened in Eden.

II. The Fall: What Happens When Headship Is Abandoned

In Genesis 3, the serpent bypassed the man and went to the woman. He inverted God’s order. And Adam, instead of protecting and ruling, abdicated his role. Eve was deceived. Adam was derelict. And humanity fell.

“And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.”
— 1 Timothy 2:14

This is not an insult to women, it is a divine warning. When a woman steps outside of headship, she is in danger. When a man steps away from authority, he invites judgment.

Headship is not a human construct. It is a spiritual defense system, and when it is removed, the home collapses, the culture deteriorates, and the church weakens.

III. A Woman’s Three Primary Headships

Biblically, a woman is to be under male authority throughout the entire course of her life:

1. The Father

“And ye shall teach them your children, speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house…”
— Deuteronomy 11:19

From birth, a girl is under the governance of her father. He is to train her, protect her, and guard her purity. He is responsible to keep her from danger—whether moral, spiritual, or relational.

In Numbers 30, God gives laws governing the vows of women. If a daughter makes a vow and her father hears it and disallows it, the vow is nullified. Why? Because she is under his jurisdiction.

“If a woman also vow a vow unto the Lord, and bind herself by a bond… being in her father’s house… and her father disallow her… then shall the Lord forgive her.”
— Numbers 30:3–5

This is legal headship. Fathers are not optional. They are God’s appointed guardians for daughters.

2. The Husband

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife…”
— Ephesians 5:22–23

When a woman marries, headship passes from father to husband. She is no longer her father’s responsibility. She becomes her husband’s charge, and she is to obey him as the church obeys Christ.

“Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord.”
— 1 Peter 3:6

This is not poetic, it is prescriptive. A woman does not lose value under authority; she gains security, direction, and honor.

3. The Eldership (in cases of widowhood, orphanhood, etc.)

When a woman has no husband and no father, she is not to drift alone. She comes under the elders of the church, the patriarchs of the community.

“Honour widows that are widows indeed… Let not a widow be taken into the number under threescore years old, having been the wife of one man…”
— 1 Timothy 5:3–9

The early church had rules and order for widows, indicating that even in their singleness, they were not to function independently. They were under the governance of the patriarchal church, and the younger widows were exhorted to remarry (1 Timothy 5:14).

IV. The Dangers of Female Autonomy

When women are not under headship, the results are devastating:

Sexual sin abounds. Young women without oversight are easy prey for seduction and fornication.
Feminism takes root. Women begin to believe they are their own authority.
Children are raised fatherless. Single mothers often reject correction and multiply generational disorder.
Churches are disrupted. Uncovered women bring emotional chaos and spiritual confusion.

“Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!”
— Isaiah 5:21

Headship is not oppression. It is protection. It keeps a woman from the deceit of Satan and the judgment of God.

V. What About Special Cases?

1. The Divorced Woman

Divorce does not grant a woman independence. It places her in a vulnerable state, one that Scripture addresses soberly. If the divorce was lawful (on grounds of adultery or abandonment by an unbeliever, Matthew 5:32, 1 Corinthians 7:15), she may remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. But she is not now a “free agent.”

She should:

Come under patriarchal church leadership for spiritual covering.
Pursue re-marriage if it is biblically permitted.
Raise children in submission to godly counsel.

She is not the head of her house. If she has sons, they must be trained under male discipleship. If she has daughters, they must be shielded from repeating her mistakes.

2. The Widow: Still in Need of Covering

Widowhood is not an exception to God’s established order. Though the husband has passed, the woman’s need for headship remains. Scripture makes it clear: no woman, regardless of age or circumstance, is ever meant to live without covering.

Young Widows: Called to Remarry

Paul gives direct instruction in 1 Timothy 5:14:

“I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.”

Young widows are not to remain alone, idle, or without direction. Paul warns that widows who remain uncovered are easily drawn into gossip, idleness, and temptation (v. 13). Remarriage is a divinely appointed path back into structure, protection, and fruitful labor within a man’s household. Headship is not optional for young widows, it is necessary for their holiness and the Church’s honor.

Older Widows: Honored, Not Autonomous

Older widows, those proven in faith and good works, are to be honored by the Church (1 Timothy 5:3, 9–10), yet they are still not independent. They remain under the spiritual covering of the church body and its male leadership. Their new role becomes one of discipleship, as Paul outlines in Titus 2:3–5:

“The aged women… that they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children… obedient to their own husbands.”

They are not liberated from order; rather, they become defenders and instructors of it.

Temporary Submission to Godly Headship

In cases where remarriage is delayed or not immediately possible, a widow may willingly submit herself to the oversight of a godly male relative, elder, or spiritual father. This kind of voluntary submission reflects the principle of headship and preserves her covering until a new marriage is rightly formed. Just as Ruth submitted herself to Boaz’s authority and provision before becoming his wife (Ruth 2:8–12), so too may a widow dwell under the shadow of a righteous man’s protection, so long as it is done in purity and order.

Never Without a Head

The Church is also called to care for and govern widows, not simply offer charity but oversight (James 1:27). A woman without a husband must not drift into spiritual autonomy. She must remain accountable and under the rule of godly men, either through remarriage or temporary oversight by the elders or righteous male leadership in her life.

The death of a husband is not the death of God’s design. Headship is not a marriage feature, it is a feminine necessity. Widowhood is a shift in placement, not a suspension of submission.

No woman, including the widow, is ever meant to be her own authority. God’s pattern does not break in crisis, it stands unshaken.

3. The Orphaned or Unmarried Daughter of a Non-Christian Home

A young woman raised outside of the faith must not interpret her background as justification for independence. If her father is unbelieving, she must:

Submit under spiritual fathers, church elders, pastors, or godly men in the community.
Pursue biblical courtship under spiritual authority, not casual dating or autonomy.
Be adopted into the household of God, where she is no longer a lone sheep but part of a covenant flock.

Even in pagan cultures, daughters were understood to belong to their fathers until given in marriage. The modern Western idea that a woman is “on her own” at 18 is rebellion disguised as liberty.

VI. Historical Witness

Throughout Church history, the principle of continuous female headship was unquestioned:

In early Israel, a daughter’s virginity was the father’s responsibility (Deuteronomy 22:13–21).
In medieval Christendom, daughters could not marry without paternal approval, and widows were overseen by church authorities.
Reformers like John Calvin and Martin Luther emphasized the father’s authority in arranging godly marriages and condemned female independence as prideful and disorderly.
Puritan families in early America treated daughters as part of the household government until they were transferred in marriage.

It is only in recent history, with the rise of Enlightenment individualism and second-wave feminism, that we see the normalization of female autonomy, a disaster for faith, family, and civilization.

VII. The Blessing of Headship

When a woman is properly covered by male headship, the result is fruitfulness, peace, and joy.

She does not carry the burden of spiritual leadership.
She is defended from predators and wolves.
She is directed in righteousness.
She is shielded from emotional instability and deception.
She glorifies God by knowing her place and delighting in it.

This is not humiliation, it is holy order. It is not shameful, it is sacred.

“Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.”
— 1 Timothy 2:11

This kind of subjection brings honor, protection, and praise. A woman who abides under headship is a builder of nations, a nurturer of kings, and a daughter of Sarah.

Conclusion: Always Covered, Always Blessed

The lie of female autonomy has destroyed generations. It has produced bitterness, barrenness, fatherlessness, and faithlessness. But the Lord calls women back, not to self-rule, but to submission.

Whether a daughter, a wife, a widow, or a woman rescued from the ruins of rebellion, every godly woman must be under righteous headship at all times.

Fathers, cover your daughters.
Husbands, lead your wives.
Elders, shepherd the uncovered.
And women, rejoice to be ruled.

You were not made to be alone. You were made to be covered.
And under that covering, you will be blessed, fruitful, protected, and glorified.Let the feminists rage.
Let the church grow bold.
Let the Great Order be restored, one household at a time.

History, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

Cats Instead of Children: The Consequences of Careerism

May 12, 2025 Lord Redbeard 12 Comments

In the modern West, a striking symbol of cultural inversion is the image of the single, professional woman cradling a cat rather than a child. It’s not merely a humorous meme—it’s a sociological reality that reflects a deep shift in values, priorities, and understanding of womanhood.

The Career as a New Identity

For much of human history, a woman’s primary domain was the household—a place of immense dignity, productivity, and influence. She nurtured life, shaped souls, and stewarded the future of her lineage. But with the rise of feminism and the industrial-technocratic model of life, women were told that their value could only be found outside the home. They were sold the idea that true fulfillment comes through career advancement, salary increases, and corporate achievements.

In this paradigm, children—especially young ones—are seen not as blessings, but as burdens. They are interruptions to productivity, threats to “freedom,” and liabilities to a woman’s upward mobility. The result? Delayed marriage, widespread infertility, and plummeting birthrates. Instead of lullabies, the halls of modern apartments echo with the meows of feline companions.

Cats Require No Sacrifice

A child requires immense sacrifice. Sleepless nights, constant attention, financial commitment, and the long, slow work of shaping another soul. It demands laying down one’s life daily. But a cat is convenient. Feed it, give it a litter box, and carry on with your life. It offers companionship without the demand of legacy. It scratches the emotional itch without requiring covenant or continuity.

This trade—life for lifestyle—is perhaps the clearest indictment of modern womanhood. In choosing cats over children, many have traded motherhood for momentary comfort. But cats don’t carry on a name. They don’t build households. They don’t honor their mother in old age or bear grandchildren.

The Feminist Promise Was a Lie

Feminism promised women “choice”—but in practice, it shamed traditional motherhood and elevated careerism as the only path to worth. The woman who chooses to bear many children, keep a home, and support her husband is often mocked as “wasting her potential.” Meanwhile, the woman who climbs the corporate ladder, drinks wine alone, and has a cat to come home to is celebrated by media as empowered.

But empowerment has come at a steep cost. Millions of women now find themselves in their 30s and 40s—lonely, childless, and deeply unfulfilled. Their fertility has faded, their relationships have withered, and their youth has been spent chasing the approval of bosses who replaced them with younger workers without a second thought.

A Culture Without Children Is a Dying Culture

When women stop having children, a nation stops having a future. The cat-as-child phenomenon is not just a personal tragedy—it’s a civilizational crisis. No generation can continue if its women reject the role of life-bearer. The womb, once seen as sacred, is now suppressed through pills, surgeries, and ideologies. But biology doesn’t bend to ideology. A woman’s body longs to nurture life, and when that drive is denied, it finds twisted replacements—whether through animals, activism, or artificial distractions.

The Path Back: Restoring the Dignity of Womanhood

The answer is not to shame women, but to call them back to glory. True femininity is not found in boardrooms or cubicles—it is found in the embrace of a newborn, the aroma of bread in the oven, the warmth of a family shaped by a wise and joyful mother. Careers can be replaced; children cannot. Promotions are temporary; legacy is eternal.

A godly woman does not need to prove herself by mimicking men. She flourishes in her God-given role as life-giver, nurturer, and queen of the home. This is not oppression. It is sacred dominion.

History, Irish, Social Topics

Irish Slave Trade

December 2, 2020 Lord Redbeard 9 Comments

They came as slaves; vast human cargo transported on tall British ships bound for the Americas. They were shipped by the hundreds of thousands and included men, women, and even the youngest of children.

Whenever they rebelled or even disobeyed an order, they were punished in the harshest ways. Slave owners would hang their human property by their hands and set their hands or feet on fire as one form of punishment. They were burned alive and had their heads placed on pikes in the marketplace as a warning to other captives.

We don’t really need to go through all of the gory details, do we? We know all too well the atrocities of the African slave trade.

But, are we talking about African slavery? King James II and Charles I also led a continued effort to enslave the Irish. Britain’s famed Oliver Cromwell furthered this practice of dehumanizing one’s next door neighbor.

The Irish slave trade began when 30,000 Irish prisoners were sold as slaves to the New World. The King James I Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.

Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.

From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.

In 1641, Ireland’s population was 1,466,000 and in 1652, 616,000. According to Sir William Petty, 850,000 were wasted by the sword, plague, famine, hardship and banishment during the Confederation War 1641-1652. At the end of the war, vast numbers of Irish men, women and children were forcibly transported to the American colonies by the English government.(7) These people were rounded up like cattle, and, as Prendergast reports on Thurloe’s State Papers(8) (Pub. London, 1742), “In clearing the ground for the adventurers and soldiers (the English capitalists of that day)… To be transported to Barbados and the English plantations in America. It was a measure beneficial to Ireland, which was thus relieved of a population that might trouble the planters; it was a benefit to the people removed, which might thus be made English and Christians … a great benefit to the West India sugar planters, who desired men and boys for their bondsmen, and the women and Irish girls… To solace them.”(9)

J. Williams provides additional evidence of the attitude of the English government towards the Irish in an English law of June 26, 1657: “Those who fail to transplant themselves into Connaught (Ireland’s Western Province) or (County) Clare within six months… Shall be attained of high treason… Are to be sent into America or some other parts beyond the seas…”(10) Those thus banished who return are to “suffer the pains of death as felons by virtue of this act, without benefit of Clergy.”(11)

The following are but a few of the numerous references to those Irish transported against their will between 1651 and 1660.

Emmet asserts that during this time, more that

“100,000 young children who were orphans or had been taken from their Catholic parents, were sent abroad into slavery in the West Indies, Virginia and New England, that they might lose their faith and all knowledge of their nationality, for in most instances even their names were changed… Moreover, the contemporary writers assert between 20,000 and 30,000 men and women who were taken prisoner were sold in the American colonie as slaves, with no respect to their former station in life.”(12)

Dunn claims in Barbados the Irish Catholics constituted the largest block of servants on the island.(13) Higham estimated that in 1652 Barbados had absorbed no less than 12,000 of these political prisoners.(14) E. Williams reports: “In 1656 Cromwell’s Council of State voted that 1,000 Irish girls and 1,000 Irish young men be sent to Jamaica.”(15) Smith declares: “it is impossible to say how many shiploads of unhappy Irish were dispatched to America by the English government,” and “no mention of such shipments would be very likely to appear in the State Papers… They must have been very considerable in number.”(16)

Estimates vary between 80,000 and 130,000 regarding the amount of Irish sent into slavery in America and the West Indies during the years of 1651 – 1660: Prendergast says 80,000(17); Boudin 100,000(18); Emmet 120,000 to 130,000(19); Lingard 60,000 up until 1656(20); and Condon estimates “the number of Irish transported to the British colonies in America from 1651 – 1660 exceeded the total number of their inhabitants at that period, a fact which ought not to be lost sight of by those who undertake to estimate the strength of the Celtic element in this nation…”(21)

It is impossible to ascertain the exact number of those unfortunate victims of English injustice during this period, but we do know the amount was massive. Even though the figures given above are but estimates, they are estimates from eminent historians.

The flow of the Irish to the American colonies throughout the remainder of the 17th century was large and continuous, but not nearly as massive as between 1651 and 1660. Some of the many statements by historians give evidence of this Irish tide. Higham reports that in 1664 the Irish took the place of the French on St. Bartholomew’s.(22) Smith claims that during the four years leading up to 1675, already 500 Irish servants were brought to Jamaica by ships from Bristol, England that stopped in Ireland for provisions.(23) During 1680 on the Leeward Islands, Dunn posits: “with so many Irish Catholic servants and farmers… The English planters became obsessed with the fear of popery.”(24) Dunn also states that in Jamaica in 1685 the 2nd Duke of Aberlmarle, after his appointment by James II, a Catholic, mustered his chief support from the Irish Catholic small planters and servants and that the indentured servants who constituted the island militia were mainly Irish Catholic.(25) In reporting on Father Garganel’s statements, Lenihan claims: “in 1699 Father Garganel, S.J., Superior of the island of Martinique, asked for one or two Irish Fathers for that and the neighboring isles which were ‘fill of Irish’ for every year shiploads of men, boys and girls, partly crimped, partly carried off by main force for the purposes of slave trade, are conveyed by the English from Ireland.”(26)

During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.

Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.

African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.

In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves has a higher intelligence level than that of African slaves, brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.

England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean because the crew was low on food.

There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery much more in the 17th Century than the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry. In 1839, Britain finally decided on its own to end its participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded this particular chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.

But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong. Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, researching and not erasing from our memories.

But, where are our public (and PRIVATE) schools???? Where are the history books? Why is it so seldom discussed?

Do the memories of hundreds of thousands of Irish victims merit more than a mention from an unknown writer? Or is their story to be one that their English pirates intended: To (unlike the African book) have the Irish story utterly and completely disappear as if it never happened.

None of the Irish victims ever made it back to their homeland to describe their ordeal. These are the lost slaves; the ones that time and biased history books conveniently forgot.

Extensive content and references for this post provided by www.globalresearch.ca

Lord Redbeard

Category Archives: History

News Sources

Pages

Catagories

Suggested Podcasts