Category Archives: Politics

In the divine hierarchy established by God, the man is the builder, the establisher, the governor. He goes out to war, to work, to wrest dominion from the earth by the sweat of his brow. He lays foundations: spiritually, economically, and physically. The woman, by contrast, is called to maintain and enforce the order her husband builds. Her task is not to innovate her own laws or construct her own dominion, but to be a wise and faithful steward of the man’s household and headship.

This is not demeaning—it is glorifying. The wife, when she faithfully fulfills her calling, sustains and beautifies the kingdom entrusted to her. She is like the moon reflecting the light of the sun—she governs the night with the authority delegated to her. She is the queen, upholding the rule of the king.

Let us examine this sacred role through Scripture, through the wisdom of our forefathers, and through the eyes of common sense, now so rare in a society poisoned by egalitarian rebellion.

I. Biblical Foundations: Keeper of the Home

The most fundamental and oft-repeated command given to the wife in Scripture is to be a keeper at home:

“That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.”
—Titus 2:4–5

The Greek word used for “keeper at home” (οἰκουργός) carries a robust meaning—“a guard or warden of the house.” Not merely a passive occupant, the wife is an active maintainer and enforcer of the household dominion. She is a steward, a governor under authority, a domestic magistrate who executes her husband’s law and vision within the sphere of their home.

The man builds; the woman maintains.

The man provides; the woman preserves.

The man establishes order; the woman enforces it.

This is her honor and her duty.

II. The Garden Pattern: From Eden to Household

The pattern of dominion and maintenance is laid down at the very beginning in the Garden of Eden. God placed Adam in the garden “to dress it and to keep it” (Genesis 2:15). After the creation of Eve, she was brought to Adam not to found her own garden, but to help him in the work God had given him. She was bone of his bones and flesh of his flesh—created for the man (1 Corinthians 11:9)—to serve, guard, beautify, and multiply what had already been given.

The fall itself occurred because Eve stepped outside her lane. She began to entertain a vision and decision-making authority apart from her husband’s rule. She failed in her duty to uphold the order given by God through Adam, and chaos ensued. Her punishment included a prophetic return to proper headship:

“Thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.”
—Genesis 3:16

Her redemption would not come through autonomy but through faithful childbearing and submission (1 Timothy 2:15).

III. Enforcing the Law of the Household

One of the gravest errors of modern women is the belief that the home is their “own domain,” independent from the oversight and rule of their husbands. This is false. The husband is head of the wife (Ephesians 5:23), and that headship extends to every sphere, including the home, rules, routines, budget, diet, and child discipline.

The wife is to enforce the laws her husband has set in place. This includes:

Bedtimes for children
Rules of modesty and dress
Household cleanliness and standards of presentation
Sabbath and feast observance
Media access and content restrictions
Chores and responsibilities
Hospitality and guest boundaries
Dietary rules/guidelines

If the husband has declared that no television shall be watched after dinner, the wife is not free to change that. If he has ruled that certain behaviors warrant discipline, she must not turn a blind eye. She must uphold his word, not undermine it. To do otherwise is to act as a usurper within the gates of his authority.

This is seen clearly in the book of Proverbs:

“The wise woman buildeth her house: but the foolish plucketh it down with her hands.”
—Proverbs 14:1

What is it that tears down a house? Rebellion against the husband’s law. Disregard for his vision. Neglect of his provision. Laziness. Gossip. Complaining. Softness with the children when firmness is required. These are not minor infractions; they are betrayals of covenant duty.

IV. Dominion by Delegation: The Stewardship of All That Is Entrusted

The godly woman is not a ruler in her own right. She is a steward, a high-ranking servant within the covenant household, entrusted with dominion that is delegated, not innate. What she oversees is not her possession, but her husband’s estate. What she manages is not her own empire, but his dominion.

This principle must be understood deeply: everything a husband gives to his wife is a sacred trust. She is not the owner of the home, the furnishings, the land, or the provision—she is the keeper, the preserver, the multiplier of that which was delivered to her by her head.

The faithful wife recognizes that to waste what her husband has built is to dishonor and disrespect him, and in so doing, to dishonor Christ, who commands her submission. It is likened to physically slapping him in the face. Her work is not freelance. Her hands are not idle. Her authority is not self-declared. Her role is sacred.

Let us now examine the breadth of her stewardship.

1. The Home: Fortress and Sanctuary

The home is the outward expression of a man’s inward order. It is the sanctuary where his rule is made manifest, where law becomes culture, where peace dwells and truth is taught.

The wife is to guard and maintain the home with holy vigilance. Cleanliness, structure, beauty, and functionality are not luxuries, they are marks of honor. Disorder in the home reflects disorder in the woman. When a wife allows clutter, laziness, decay, or distraction to take root, she is not just being careless, she is allowing the enemy within the gates.

Every room, every corner, every closet is a reflection of the stewardship of the woman. She is called to maintain the home not as a showpiece for outsiders, but as a place of ordered dominion where her husband’s rule is made visible.

“She looketh well to the ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness.”
—Proverbs 31:27

2. Furnishings and Garments: Order in the Details

The beds her husband purchased are to be made. The tables he provided are to be cleared and set. The furniture he supplied is to be cared for with dignity—not stained, destroyed, or buried beneath toys and debris. This is not about materialism—it is about respect.

Likewise, the clothing he provides for his wife and children is to be maintained with diligence. Torn seams should be mended. Laundry should not pile to the ceiling. Stains should be addressed. Shoes should be clean and placed in order.

The Proverbs 31 woman is not a passive consumer, she is a craftswoman, a caretaker, a provider of beauty. Her efforts in these things express her gratitude to God and to her husband.

“She maketh herself coverings of tapestry; her clothing is silk and purple.”
—Proverbs 31:22

3. Garden and Grounds: Dominion Over the Earth

The garden and yard, however large or small—are part of the man’s dominion. Whether a few raised beds or a broad acreage, they are under the wife’s stewardship. A weed-choked garden and a trash-littered yard dishonor the name of the man who pays for that land.

The godly woman will ensure the grass is cut, the flowers maintained, the tools cared for, the trash bins orderly, and the land not neglected. She teaches her children that even the appearance of the home’s grounds reflects the glory of their father.

“She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard.”
—Proverbs 31:16

This is not just busy work. It is visible dominion. It is faithfulness in the little things.

4. Vehicles, Tools, and Implements: Respecting the Man’s Work

The car her husband bought for the family is not a garbage heap. The truck he uses for work is not a playground. The tools he stores in the garage are not toys. Every item her husband has earned by the sweat of his brow must be treated with reverence.

She should ensure that oil changes happen on schedule, that children do not slam car doors or mishandle equipment, that tools are returned to their place, and that vehicles remain clean and ready for use.

A faithful wife will train the children to handle these things properly and speak of them with respect. Why? Because these items are extensions of the man’s work. To lack respect for the items acquired by the husband is to dishonor.

5. Finances and Household Resources: Guarding the Treasury

Every dollar her husband earns represents time away from home, risk, sweat, and toil. The faithful wife does not squander this. She does not waste household money on trinkets, convenience foods, unneeded luxuries, or vanity. She keeps records, stretches each dollar, plans meals, compares prices, shows accountability and multiplies what is given.

“The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.”
—Proverbs 31:11

In the biblical order, the husband is the provider, the household king; the wife is the treasurer, the household steward. She may not generate the income, but she governs its use. She does not spend frivolously. She spends righteously.

She is the Proverbs 31 woman—not chasing careers, but making her husband’s name great in the gates by her industry and faithfulness.

V. Historical Witnesses: Women of Order and Excellence

The vision of a woman as steward, guardian, and enforcer of her husband’s dominion is not merely a biblical ideal—it is a pattern consistently affirmed in the lives of godly women throughout history. In eras of strength, women embraced this sacred charge and preserved the household economy, the moral law, and domestic order with diligence and reverence. Their names are not always remembered, but the civilizations they upheld were built upon their faithfulness.

1. The Matriarchs of Scripture

From Sarah to Ruth, from Hannah to Elizabeth, the holy women of old built nothing of their own name, but magnified the names of their husbands and sons through obedience and faithful stewardship.

Sarah, though married to the great patriarch Abraham, was not known for public exploits but for reverence and obedience:

“Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well…”
—1 Peter 3:6

Rebekah, Rachel, and Leah each submitted to the headship of the men appointed to them and managed the flocks, tents, and children with steadfastness, bearing the future of Israel on their backs.

Hannah’s sacrifice of Samuel was not a detachment from motherhood—it was a fulfillment of her vow to uphold the household’s devotion to God, giving her son back to the Lord in accordance with her husband’s leadership.

2. The Noble Wives of the Reformation

In the time of the Protestant Reformation, when men were risking their lives to preach the gospel and reform the Church, their wives were not idle. They built homes, taught children, cultivated gardens, welcomed persecuted believers, and enforced household law without wavering.

Katharina von Bora, the wife of Martin Luther, managed a complex estate, fed dozens daily, and kept order in a home that was often a refuge for students, refugees, and reformers. Luther affectionately called her “My Lord Kate,” not because she ruled him, but because she ruled the home well under his authority.

She did not seek to lead the Reformation in the public square. She ruled her portion of the kingdom—faithfully maintaining what Luther, her head, had built. That was her glory.

3. The Colonial and Pioneer Women of America

In early America, the homestead was the heart of civilization. Men cleared the land, raised barns, and established farms, but it was the wives who turned rough wood and stone into sanctuaries of peace and law.

These women enforced strict order in their homes: keeping meals on schedule, teaching catechisms, disciplining children, managing livestock, storing food, and maintaining cleanliness even under harsh frontier conditions. Their husbands rode for supplies, went to war, or labored in the fields—often for weeks—trusting that all would be in order upon return.

They were not seeking escape through feminism or employment in town. They had dominion to keep. A fire to tend. A people to govern in the name of their husband and unto the Lord!

4. Victorian and Edwardian Homemakers

Even in the great cities of England and America, Christian wives understood that the home was a moral and spiritual realm to be governed under the man’s headship. Victorian households were marked by schedule, virtue, modesty, and order. The lady of the house enforced the rhythm of the day—prayers, meals, instruction, cleanliness, and decorum.

She was a steward of appearances and behavior, ensuring that what her husband established—socially, financially, and religiously, was preserved, reinforced, and passed on.

The collapse of such homes in the 20th century was not accidental. It came when women left the post of keeper and began to clamor for equal rulership, collapsing the hierarchy that had upheld generations of Christian family strength.

VI. Modern Rebellion and the Decay of Stewardship

The enemy of order is rebellion, and rebellion now wears the mask of liberation. Modernity has sold women a bitter lie: that to serve under a man’s authority is slavery, and that to preserve his house is demeaning. The consequence? A generation of women who despise the very work for which they were created—and homes that lie in ruins because of it.

The home has been traded for the cubicle, the cradle for the boardroom, the garden for gossip, and the order of the husband for the doctrines of feminism. Where once women built multigenerational households under patriarchal authority, now they chase paychecks and political power, leaving the home desolate.

The average woman today cannot sew, cook from scratch, manage a budget, discipline her children, and cannot submit to her husband’s law without complaint. She has been trained to scorn these things—to see the dominion of the household as a prison rather than a throne.

“Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God… Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”
—Romans 1:21–22

Women who abandon their post as keepers of the home do not merely create messy houses, they dismantle civilizations. The household is the smallest unit of God’s kingdom on earth. When it is neglected, the Church is weakened, the nation is corrupted, and the next generation is lost.

The spirit of rebellion has consequences:

Children are undisciplined and defiant.
Homes are disordered, chaotic, and joyless.
Husbands are dishonored and treated as equals—or worse, as burdens.
Finances spiral into debt and dysfunction.
Generations forget the law of God.

This is not a theoretical problem. It is the daily, lived reality of most families in the West. And the solution is not another conference, podcast, or Instagram reel. The solution is repentance. The solution is a return to The Great Order—where men lead in righteousness and women submit in reverent stewardship.

There is no neutral ground. A woman is either upholding her husband’s dominion or undermining it. She is either honoring the law of the house or sowing confusion within it. There is no such thing as harmless rebellion.

Let the women of God renounce the rebellion of our age. Let them cast down the idols of feminism, egalitarianism, and careerism. Let them return home, not as slaves, but as stewards. Not as doormats, but as queens under the crown. And let them raise daughters who do the same.

“Let the aged women… teach the young women… to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home… that the word of God be not blasphemed.”
—Titus 2:3–5

The world blasphemes when Christian women abandon their role. But heaven rejoices when the household is ordered according to God’s design.

VII. Let Her Reign: The Glory of the Faithful Steward

The faithful wife is not a background figure in her husband’s dominion—she is its heartbeat. She reigns not by usurping his authority, but by glorifying it. She extends his law. She enforces his order. She multiplies his provision. And in doing so, she magnifies her own glory, for “a virtuous woman is a crown to her husband” (Proverbs 12:4).

Let no woman shrink from this call. Let no wife despise her sacred role. For the one who maintains what her husband has built is not a servant in chains, but a queen entrusted with treasure.

She reigns when she:

Keeps the home clean, orderly, and peaceful, reflecting her husband’s wisdom.
Disciplines the children with consistency, upholding his authority.
Guards his time, his name, and his resources with watchful diligence.
Respects the furnishings, land, vehicles, and tools he has earned with honor.
Upholds the laws of the household—not with pride, but with obedience.

This is her crown. This is her dominion. This is her offering of praise—not with lips only, but with labor. Not in theory, but in the daily practice of keeping, tending, multiplying, and glorifying what her husband has entrusted to her.

“Every wise woman buildeth her house: but the foolish plucketh it down with her hands.”
—Proverbs 14:1

Let her rise in the strength of the Lord. Let her reject the slanders of a godless age. Let her take joy in her husband’s approval, in her children’s obedience, and in the fruit of her hands. Her work is not small, it is the work of empires, the labor of queens.

Let her speak to her daughters not of careers and competition, but of covenant and stewardship. Let her show them that the path of glory is found in obedience. That the house is not a trap, but a throne. That to be a keeper at home is not to hide from the world, but to reshape it through generational dominion.

And when the world mocks, let her laugh. When fools scoff, let her remember that God smiles on the woman who fears Him. Her reward is eternal, her legacy generational, and her title high: faithful steward of her husband’s house.

“Give her of the fruit of her hands; and let her own works praise her in the gates.”
—Proverbs 31:31

Let the wives arise. Let them keep what has been built. Let them enforce what has been ordered. Let them glorify their husbands by reigning in reverent submission.

This is The Great Order. And it shall not be shaken!

Health, Holidays, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

Pride Month: The Celebration of Rebellion and the Collapse of a Nation

June 2, 2025 Lord Redbeard 6 Comments

Part 1: The Rise of Pride — From Sin to Celebration

“Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.”
— Proverbs 16:18 (KJV)

Every year, like clockwork, the month of June arrives, no longer greeted with the rhythms of summer planting, family feasts, or the sacred honoring of fathers, but with rainbow flags, grotesque parades, drag queens, corporate virtue-signaling, and a sweeping national campaign of blasphemy and confusion. It is called “Pride Month,” but what it really celebrates is not pride in the Biblical sense, of craftsmanship or good labor, but pride in its most demonic form: the willful, defiant exaltation of sin.

What we see paraded today is not just sexual confusion or moral looseness, it is open war against God’s created order. Pride Month is a state-sanctioned sacrament in the new religion of rebellion. It is the liturgical high feast of a culture that has cut off its roots from the Word of God and drinks deeply from the chalice of perversion.

The Deception of “Progress”

The world tells us this movement is about love, inclusion, and tolerance. But scratch the surface, and what you find is a gospel of self-worship and lawlessness. The “love” that is paraded is not the self-sacrificing, covenantal love of Christ, it is the celebration of unrestrained lust. The “inclusion” is not the kind Christ extended to sinners who repented, but the forced acceptance of sin and the silencing of those who dare to call it by its name.

In less than a century, what once was rightfully outlawed and condemned as abomination (Leviticus 18:22) has been exalted to the status of virtue. And what once was held sacred, marriage, gender, modesty, headship, and moral order, has been relentlessly attacked, mocked, and torn down.

But how did we get here? How did a nation once founded on Biblical principles descend into celebrating the very things that provoke God’s wrath?

The answer lies in a long and deliberate revolution, one that began not with rainbow flags, but with the systematic dismantling of Biblical authority, patriarchy, and the household.

The Path to Pride: Rebellion by Design

Satan has always worked the same strategy: “Hath God said?” From the garden to modern America, the serpent’s hiss has echoed through every institution. The moral revolution did not begin with gay marriage or transgenderism. It began when man rejected the Great Order of God: His law, His family structure, His definitions of right and wrong.

The Enlightenment dethroned God’s law in favor of man’s reason. Feminism declared war on headship. Humanism exalted feelings above obedience. And the sexual revolution finished the job by severing the body from its design and purpose. It told men and women that their identities were not received from God, but created from within, the ultimate rebellion.

By the time Obergefell v. Hodges was handed down by the Supreme Court in 2015, legalizing so-called “gay marriage,” the spiritual and cultural rot had already taken hold. The ruling was merely the final nail in the coffin of a society that had rejected God’s authority long ago.

What followed was the formal institutionalization of sin. Now, not only is homosexuality protected and normalized, it is praised. Now, not only are children exposed to perversion, they are targeted, recruited, and indoctrinated in schools, media, and even churches.

This is no accident. It is a deliberate, well-funded, and spiritually motivated assault on the foundation stones of God’s creation.

The New State Religion

Pride Month is not just a celebration, it is a false religion, complete with its own doctrines, saints, symbols, and punishments for heresy.

The rainbow, once the covenant sign of God’s mercy after judgment, is now waved in the streets as a symbol of rebellion against the Creator.
The parades, complete with nudity, bondage, and grotesque displays, are now considered family events.
Corporations and governments fly the pride flag with more zeal than they ever showed for their own nation’s flag.
Churches drape rainbow stoles on their pulpits and dare to claim God affirms what He condemns.

Like Nebuchadnezzar’s golden image, the rainbow idol is now raised high, and all are expected to bow, or face social and economic destruction. Bake the cake. Use the pronouns. Affirm the delusion. Or be canceled, fired, de-platformed, and silenced.

This is not about freedom. It is about enforced submission to Sodom’s values.

Pride Is Not a Side Issue

There are many who still try to dismiss this as a political or “cultural” issue, separate from the faith. But this is no peripheral battle. This is a frontline war for the soul of the nation and the future of our children.

The normalization of homosexuality and transgenderism is not just a sin among others, it is a signpost of a society under judgment.

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections…”
— Romans 1:26 (KJV)

Romans 1 lays it out clearly: when a people reject the knowledge of God, He gives them over to their own depraved desires. The rise of open sodomy, gender confusion, and prideful defiance of nature is not merely tolerated sin, it is a divine punishment. It is not a sign of liberty, but of spiritual decay.

When a society is given over to Pride, it is already in the final stages of rot. The foundations have collapsed. The hedge of protection is broken. And the wrath of God is already working its way through the land, one mutilated child, one shattered household, one desecrated pulpit at a time.

From Sodom to Now: A Pattern of Judgment

There is a reason why Sodom is mentioned over and over again in Scripture, not merely as a past event, but as a type, a prophetic warning.

Isaiah 3:9: “The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul!”
Luke 17:28–30: As it was in the days of Lot, so shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.

Sodom was not destroyed merely for being perverse, it was destroyed because the culture celebrated its perversion, pushed it on others, and rejected the righteous warnings of God’s people.

Sound familiar?

Today, we see the same pattern:
Sin is no longer hidden, it is celebrated.
God’s design is no longer honored, it is defied.
Those who speak the truth are not just ignored, they are hated.

And what did Lot do? He fled. He didn’t argue with the crowd. He didn’t start a dialogue. He led his household out, before the fire fell.

So must we.

Part 2: The Rotten Fruits — What Pride Actually Produces

“Ye shall know them by their fruits.”
— Matthew 7:16 (KJV)

We live in a culture that endlessly chants, “Love is love,” “Trans women are women,” and “Celebrate Pride,” while shutting its eyes to the catastrophic fruits of these lies. But God is not mocked. That which a man or a nation sows, it shall also reap (Galatians 6:7). And the harvest of Pride is now fully visible, for those with eyes to see.

Let us look soberly at the fruit this movement has produced, not according to the slogans, but by its real-world consequences.

1. The Destruction of the Family

Pride ideology is an open war against the family as God designed it. The household is the bedrock of civilization, husband as head, wife as helper, children as the inheritance of the Lord. But in the name of “inclusion,” Pride seeks to redefine the family, erase gender roles, and sterilize the future.

“Two dads” or “two moms” is not a family, it is a counterfeit.
A “pregnant man” is not a miracle, it is a mentally ill woman pumped with testosterone.
Children raised in these households are not “progressive”, they are victims of confusion and stolen identity.

Studies have shown that children raised in same-sex households suffer higher rates of depression, gender confusion, emotional instability, and identity disorder. But even beyond the statistics, we must ask: What right does anyone have to deny a child a father or a mother in the name of adult gratification?

Pride Month glorifies this theft. It cheers for households without headship, for wombs rented by money, for surrogacy-by-contract, and for children as trophies. This is not love, it is wickedness.

2. The Mutilation of the Body

Perhaps the most grotesque fruit of Pride ideology is the irreversible mutilation of the human body, especially in children. In any sane civilization, a child cannot buy alcohol or vote, but in ours, a confused 13-year-old can begin hormone therapy, bind their chest, or schedule a mastectomy with the blessing of state-funded doctors.

This is not “affirming care.” This is child abuse dressed in clinical terms.

Boys are castrated, girls are sterilized, and thousands are left with permanent damage, physically, emotionally, spiritually. The skyrocketing number of “detransitioners” tells a story the media refuses to report: pain, regret, and irreparable harm.

The Pride movement does not protect children. It preys on them.

3. The Collapse of Moral Boundaries

With every passing year, the line moves further.

What began as “love wins” quickly became “pronouns or else.”
What began as “equal rights” turned into forced participation in perversion.
What began as tolerance of sin is now intolerance of righteousness.

There are now calls in serious academic and activist circles to “reimagine” the age of consent, to decriminalize pedophilia, to promote “minor-attracted persons” as an “orientation.” This is no slippery slope theory, it is happening now, in broad daylight, backed by “Pride scholarship” and media silence.

God’s law provides clear moral boundaries, not to restrict joy, but to preserve it. When a society destroys these boundaries, it gives way to chaos, delusion, and eventually tyranny.

4. Mental Illness and Suicide

We are told that those in the LGBT community suffer from depression and suicidal ideation because of “social stigma.” But in reality, these outcomes persist even in countries, cities, and homes that are completely affirming.

The truth is simple: living in rebellion to one’s design leads to despair.

When a man rejects what he was made to be, when a woman severs herself from her God-given glory, when a person cuts off their natural function, it cannot bring peace.

Pride promises joy. But its fruit is confusion, pain, and death.

“The way of transgressors is hard.”
— Proverbs 13:15 (KJV)

5. The Blasphemy of the Church

Perhaps the most shameful fruit of the Pride movement is its colonization of once-Christian churches. There is scarcely a major denomination left uncorrupted. Rainbow flags now hang in sanctuaries where the Word of God once thundered. Effeminate false teachers proclaim that “God is queer” or “Jesus had two dads.” “Affirming” congregations perform same-sex “weddings” and host drag shows in their fellowship halls.

These are not churches. They are synagogues of Satan (Revelation 2:9). They do not speak for Christ. They crucify Him afresh.

Worse, these wolves devour the simple, deceive the young, and turn the sheep against the Shepherd.

Let it be known: no man, no woman, no church that affirms the Pride agenda is of Christ. No one who flies the rainbow flag in defiance of God’s Word will stand justified on the Day of Judgment.

6. National Collapse

What happens when a nation exalts sin?

Rome fell as sexual chaos overtook its people and virtue was lost.
Weimar Germany was infamous for its sexual depravity before it collapsed.
Sodom was reduced to ash.
Israel was exiled again and again for following after the abominations of the nations.

America is no exception. A nation that lifts high the flag of Sodom will suffer the fate of Sodom.

Economic collapse, demographic decline, national division, loss of purpose, military weakness, and divine judgment all follow in the wake of Pride. The wrath of God is not only future, it is already active. He has given this culture over.

Part 3: The Righteous Response — Come Out and Rebuild

“And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.”
— Revelation 18:4 (KJV)

We do not watch Pride Month unfold as idle observers. We are not helpless. We are not without orders. As God’s covenant men and women, as builders of households, keepers of the faith, and stewards of the land, we are called to respond, to resist, and to rebuild.

The hour is late. The corruption is deep. But our mission is unchanged: to establish God’s order in our homes, raise up a righteous seed, and build altars in a land of idols.

1. Refuse to Celebrate Rebellion

The first act of resistance is to refuse participation.

There is no neutrality. You cannot wave the rainbow flag and claim the name of Christ. You cannot attend Pride events and say you follow the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. You cannot affirm what God abhors.

It is time to burn the bridges to Babylon:

Cancel every Pride-themed subscription, product, or platform.
Pull your children from any school that affirms LGBT ideology, even passively.
Do not shop at stores or support companies that openly mock God.
Stop using euphemisms. Sodomy is not “orientation.” Confusion is not “identity.” It is sin.

The line is drawn. You must choose sides.

“No man can serve two masters…”
— Matthew 6:24

2. Declare the Truth Boldly

Silence is not love. In the face of such brazen rebellion, the truth must be declared without apology:

Homosexuality is a sin.
Transgenderism is a delusion.
God made them male and female, no in between, no transition.
Marriage is only between one man and one woman (or multiple women), under the headship of a righteous man.
Children are to be trained in truth, not raised as experiments for social engineering.

This truth must be spoken, in our homes, pulpits, streets, and online. The church’s silence is what allowed Pride to metastasize into a cultural cancer. That silence must end.

Let fathers speak. Let husbands correct. Let pastors thunder. Let no man fear the scorn of Babylon when he holds the sword of truth.

3. Build Households of Order

The most powerful act of resistance is to build what the enemy seeks to destroy.

Establish your household under God’s law and patriarchal headship.
Train your sons to be protectors, providers, and priests.
Train your daughters to build homes, love their husbands, and raise a righteous seed.
Multiply. Bear children. Expand your domain. Receive wives and steward them with godly authority.
Feast, worship, study, and labor under the banner of Yahweh, not the flag of rebellion.

Every household in order is a fortress. Every obedient family is a rebuke to the rainbow cult. Every baby born into the covenant is a future soldier against Sodom.

This is not merely personal. It is generational warfare.

“Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it…”
— Psalm 127:1

4. Withdraw from Their Systems

You cannot raise godly offspring while feeding them to Caesar’s institutions.

Leave the public schools. They are temples of the Pride religion.
Reject mainstream media. Hollywood is a pipeline of filth and confusion.
Exit compromised churches. Any church that affirms sin, tolerates Pride flags, or refuses to call rebellion what it is, must be left behind.
Disentangle from dependency. A godly household must not rely on a system that hates God.

This is Exodus. The only safe place is outside the gates, where Christ bears the reproach (Hebrews 13:13).

5. Prepare for Persecution

If you stand against Pride, persecution will come. That’s not a threat, it’s a promise from Scripture.

You may be fired.
You may be de-platformed.
You may lose friends, family, and comfort.

But you will gain the smile of heaven.

“Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you… for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad…”
— Matthew 5:11-12

Let them mock. Let them rage. The fire of Sodom is coming again, but this time, it will not be local. It will be global. And only those who stand with God will stand at all.

6. Let the Patriarchs Rise

The war on gender, family, and truth is ultimately a war on God’s dominion plan through men. Pride exalts disorder, effeminacy, confusion, and rebellion because Satan hates masculine headship, hates fruitfulness, and hates covenant.

Now more than ever, we need patriarchs:

Men who fear God and love His law.
Men who reject compromise and take dominion.
Men who lead their wives, disciple their children, and plant banners of truth in enemy territory.

Let the emasculated church fall. Let the hireling shepherds run. But let the patriarchs rise, and rebuild.

The rainbow belongs to God. Not to sodomites.
The children belong to covenant households. Not to drag queens.
The future belongs to the righteous. Not to the perverse.

Final Exhortation: Reclaim the Month

We must not merely boycott Pride Month. We must reclaim it.

Dedicate the month of June to household revival, fasting, family worship, and Scripture memorization.
Teach your children the truth of Genesis 1–3, Romans 1, and Revelation 18.
Celebrate God’s created order. Proclaim the beauty of masculine strength and feminine submission.
Pray as families against the abominations in the land.
Make June a month of Biblical protest, a feast of truth in a time of confusion.

Let this be our declaration:

“As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.”
— Joshua 24:15

History, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

A Vote Against Order: Why Women Were Not Meant to Govern, Or Vote

May 26, 2025 Lord Redbeard 20 Comments

“As for My people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O My people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.”
— Isaiah 3:12

The ballot box has become an altar of modern idolatry. At it, masses gather not to enthrone Christ, but to legitimize rebellion. Democracy, untethered from righteousness, becomes mob rule. And when the mob is led by emotions rather than eternal truth, when the passions of women, ungoverned by male headship, flood the halls of power, we should not be surprised when order collapses and nations descend into chaos.

This is not a minor matter. This is not political theory. This is about authority, order, and the covenantal structure of God’s creation.

I. Biblical Authority and the Principle of Headship

From the beginning, God established a chain of command. Man was made first, then woman (1 Timothy 2:13). Adam was created to lead, govern, and guard. Eve was created as a helper, under his direction. She was not tasked with dominion directly—but with assisting her husband in his calling.

“But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man…”
— 1 Corinthians 11:3

Voting is not neutral. It is not merely a civic act, it is an act of dominion. To vote is to rule, to select leaders, to set policy, to shape the future. This is inherently a masculine duty. In Scripture, all dominion tasks are given to men, eldership, kingship, priesthood, judgment, warfare, governance.

No woman in the Bible was ever called to rule over men. Even Deborah’s brief presence in the Book of Judges is a condemnation, not a commendation. Her leadership came because the men had failed—not because God desired it.

“I arose a mother in Israel.” — Judges 5:7

Deborah did not glory in her authority. She lamented the state of the nation and functioned more as a prophetess than a governor. Her very presence in that role was a judgment upon Israel’s disorder.

II. Voting as an Exercise of Rule

Voting, especially in modern republics, is the mechanism by which the public exercises civil authority. But under God’s order, women were never given this authority, not in the family, not in the church, not in the state.

We are not left to guess what God thinks of women ruling.

“As for My people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them…”
— Isaiah 3:12

This is not a blessing. It is a curse.

Let it be stated plainly: the vote is a symbol of rule. And rule belongs to men. A woman casting a vote apart from her husband’s covering, direction, and headship is a rebellion against this order.

Just as a wife must not usurp authority in the home or church (1 Timothy 2:12), she must not be given political power independent of her husband’s rule.

III. The Historical Witness: Women’s Suffrage and Social Collapse

Let us be clear: the call for women’s suffrage was not birthed in holiness, but in humanism and rebellion.

The 19th and 20th century feminist movements, including the push for the vote, were spearheaded by God-hating, authority-rejecting women like Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Margaret Sanger, who not only rejected biblical womanhood, but also mocked Scripture, promoted sexual libertinism, and sought the destruction of the family as it had stood for millennia.

They knew what they were doing. The vote was not the end goal, it was the first tool. Once women gained the vote, they did not use it to uphold order. They used it to elect leaders who promised security over responsibility, emotion over justice, and entitlement over duty. The welfare state, no-fault divorce, abortion on demand, and the explosion of anti-family policies were all hastened by the female vote.

Statistically, it is well-documented that women, on average, vote more liberally than men. Women are more likely to vote for bigger government, for social programs that reward dependency, and for candidates that appeal to emotion rather than law.

This is not because women are stupid. It is because they are designed to be nurturers, not rulers. Women are created to serve in the private sphere of the household, not the public arena of governance. When they are placed in the realm of policy, war, and judgment—realms that require justice and finality—they are out of place. And the whole nation suffers for it.

IV. What Was Lost: The Era Before Feminist Democracy

Before women’s suffrage, the Western world flourished under Christian civilization. Families were large. Nations were strong. Churches had power. The household was productive. And the woman’s glory was her home, not her ballot.

In Colonial America, Christian commonwealths like Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay upheld God’s law as supreme. Women could not vote, not because they were degraded, but because their role was sacred and protected. They governed their homes under their husbands’ rule. Men bore the weight of lawmaking and nation-building, and women focused on raising future rulers.

This pattern held true across centuries of Christendom. In Geneva under Calvin, in Puritan England, in early America—the vote was a burden of responsibility borne by men who were expected to rule their households well and represent them publicly.

Even in the Roman Republic, voting and office-holding were strictly male responsibilities. It was understood, even by pagans, that a nation could not endure when governed by emotion, sentiment, or soft rule.

V. Practical Application in a Decayed Democracy

We are no longer living in Christendom. The Christian man finds himself now in Babylon, a decaying empire where Jezebel sits in the halls of power and votes are offered to Molech.

In this context, some Christian husbands may ask: Should I allow my wife to vote?

The answer must begin with this: she must not vote as an autonomous individual. If she votes, it must be under your direction, according to your conscience, as your delegate, not as a free agent.

This is not ideal. But we are not in an ideal system. We are in exile.

If a godly husband decides that it is strategically wise for his wife to cast a ballot under his authority, as an extension of his household’s voice in a corrupted system, this is not a violation of headship. This is wartime logistics.

But let no Christian wife imagine that her right to vote is derived from the Constitution rather than the covenant. Her suffrage is not personal, it is patriarchal. And if she votes apart from her husband’s explicit direction and permission, she sins.

Just as Eve should not have dialogued with the serpent without Adam, no Christian wife should engage in political decision-making without her husband’s covering.

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.”
— Ephesians 5:22

VI. Restoring the Household as the Political Unit

Under Biblical law, the household is the basic unit of dominion—not the individual. This is why ancient Israel was organized by tribes and households. Men represented their families at the city gates.

“Her husband is known in the gates, when he sitteth among the elders of the land.”
— Proverbs 31:23

God’s pattern has always been covenantal and familial, not democratic and individualistic. The father, as the head of his house, bears the responsibility to speak, act, and rule on behalf of his wife and children. This includes religious life, economic life, and civil engagement.

The modern individualistic vote atomizes the household, fractures unity, and empowers children and wives to act in rebellion against the father’s leadership. A daughter may vote against her father’s values. A wife may cancel her husband’s vote at the polls. A household becomes a civil war.

This is not the way of the Lord.

In the Great Order, the household speaks with one voice, under one head. Whether in private worship or public witness, the patriarch governs, and the family follows.

VII. Let the Women Return to Strength

To say a woman should not vote is not to say she is weak. Quite the opposite. It is to return her to her proper sphere of dominion: the home. Scripture does not silence women—it dignifies them by placing them where their gifts bear fruit.

“The wise woman buildeth her house: but the foolish plucketh it down with her hands.”
— Proverbs 14:1

Let her build. Let her nurture. Let her train the next generation of rulers. This is real dominion—not illusionary political participation.

The modern woman may boast of her vote, but her home lies in ruins. Her womb is barren. Her children are strangers. Her marriage is shattered. What has the vote gained her? A louder voice in a collapsing civilization.

Christian woman, you are not called to vote, you are called to obey. You are not called to campaign, you are called to build. You are not called to legislate, you are called to labor in love.

Return to your first ministry: the home. Rejoice in your place. Your crown is not political power—it is children, submission, and faithfulness.

“Not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;
But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.”
— 1 Timothy 2:9–10

VIII. The Way Forward: Order in Exile

The Christian man today must walk wisely. He must navigate a hostile culture with clarity and conviction. Though the world has made voting a right, he must remember that his household operates under heaven’s laws, not man’s.

So:

If your wife desires to vote, teach her. Lead her. If permitted, let her vote only in submission to your headship, and according to righteousness.
If you abstain from voting altogether, so be it, but ensure your abstention is principled, not passive.
Train your sons to rule. Teach them that voting is not a birthright but a duty of headship. One day, they will carry the weight of representing your house.
Teach your daughters that their strength is not in influence over men, but in obedience to God and service to their homes.

And above all—build. Build households that defy feminism by their very existence. Build homes where ballots are irrelevant, because God’s Word rules.

IX. Conclusion: Votes Fade—But Order Remains

The vote is a flicker. A civilization may be won or lost at the ballot box, but it is built or destroyed at the dinner table. The true power is in the household. And the household thrives only under God’s order.

Let the feminists rage. Let the statists mock. Let the weak men surrender. We will not!

We are not interested in permission from Washington. We have a mandate from the Word.

Women were not created to rule, but to reflect the glory of their husbands, to nurture life, and to model godly submission.

Let the households of God stand tall once more, with fathers who rule, mothers who build, and children who obey.

Let the Great Order rise again!

“He that ruleth his house well, having his children in subjection with all gravity… For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?”
— 1 Timothy 3:4–5

Soli Deo Gloria.

Conspiracies, History, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

The Real Pay Gap: How Men Labor While Women Reap

May 22, 2025 Lord Redbeard 30 Comments

“In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground…”
— Genesis 3:19

For decades, the feminists have wailed their favorite grievance: the “gender pay gap.” They have weaponized a misleading statistic—that women make “77 cents on the dollar” compared to men—and turned it into a battering ram against patriarchy, biblical order, and masculine dominion.

But like most feminist talking points, this one withers under the heat of Scripture, truth, and reality.

The truth is this: there is no unjust gender pay gap. What we find, instead, is a work gap, a risk gap, and a responsibility gap—and in each case, it is men who bear the burden. Men work longer hours, take more dangerous jobs, build and maintain the infrastructure of civilization, and carry the weight of provision. And yet, the modern system subsidizes, privileges, and protects women in the workforce far beyond what their labor merits.

The so-called “gender pay gap” is not a sign of oppression. It is a manipulated statistic used to justify rebellion against God’s order.

Let us examine this issue through three lenses:

I. Scripture and the Created Order

Men Are Called to Toil, Provide, and Rule

From the beginning, God assigned the burden of labor to man:

“And unto Adam he said… cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life… In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread.”
— Genesis 3:17–19

It was to Adam, not Eve, that God gave the curse of toil. It was the man who was to labor, bleed, and bear the weight of provision. The woman, in contrast, was assigned the domain of home and childbearing:

“Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children…”
— Genesis 3:16

In God’s design, man goes out to provide and protect. Woman stays in, to nurture and build the household. This division is not oppressive—it is ordered, sacred, and life-giving.

The modern attempt to drag women into male roles—into combat, coal mines, skyscraper construction, and executive boardrooms—does not liberate them. It degrades them. It robs both man and woman of their glory.

Wives Are Not Independent Providers

The Proverbs 31 woman is often cited by egalitarians as a model of female entrepreneurship. But what they forget is this: she operates under the covering of her husband.

“The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her… She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard.”
— Proverbs 31:11, 16

Her industry is not rebellion—it is aligned with her husband’s house. She does not have a separate career or independent economic identity. She is fruitful within the household economy.

She does not march into the world demanding equal pay. She builds for her family, under headship.

II. The Myth of the Wage Gap

What the Numbers Actually Say

The 77–82 cent statistic often cited in media reports is not a comparison of men and women doing the same jobs for the same hours. It is a raw average across all jobs, hours, choices, and experience levels.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), when controlling for hours worked, experience, occupation, education, and other relevant factors, the gap shrinks to less than 5 cents, and in some cases, women earn more than men in comparable roles.

Research from Harvard University economist Claudia Goldin—no friend of patriarchy—acknowledged:

“Much of the gender pay gap is the result of differences in work experience, job flexibility preferences, and occupation, rather than overt discrimination.”

Translation: women choose different careers. They work fewer hours. They prioritize family, flexibility, and stability. And they get paid accordingly.

The problem is not injustice. It is that women are not men—and thank God for that.

Women Are Paid More Than They Should Be

Far from being oppressed, many women are overpaid, coddled, and favored by HR departments eager to hit “diversity” quotas.

A 2023 study by Glassdoor found that in many industries, women now out-earn men when comparing younger workers or new hires. Fields like healthcare administration, social work, and education show female advantage in both pay and promotion.

And when benefits, time off, and job perks are included, the picture gets worse.

Women:

Take more sick days (and get paid for them)
Use more maternity leave (often fully paid)
Work fewer overtime hours
Refuse dangerous or strenuous tasks
Are less likely to relocate for work

Yet they are often shielded from layoffs, promoted faster, and praised more loudly—for less risk and lower output.

This is not equality. This is preferential treatment.

III. Men Do the Dirty Work of Civilization

Who Builds and Maintains the World?

The world women live in—safe, structured, and supplied—is built by men.

Consider these fields:

Construction: 90–95% male
Electricians: 98% male
Plumbers: 97% male
Oil and Gas Workers: 95%+ male
Garbage Collectors: 99% male
Roofers, Welders, Truck Drivers: 90%+ male

These jobs are physically taxing, dangerous, and often thankless. Men die in mines, fall from scaffolds, suffer in trenches—not because of oppression, but because they are obeying the mandate to labor and provide.

And while women demand “equal pay,” few demand equal risk.

You will not find feminist protests demanding inclusion in sewer repair, high-rise window cleaning, or long-haul trucking.

Women want equal reward, but not equal sacrifice.

Death and Injury on the Job

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics:

93% of workplace fatalities are men
Men account for the vast majority of serious injuries, chemical exposure, falls, burns, and machinery accidents

Men die at work so women can sit at climate-controlled desks writing articles about how unfair it is.

This is not justice—it is mockery.

IV. The Feminization of the Workforce

Women in Positions They Should Not Hold

As the feminist regime pushes women into every sector, we are witnessing a tragic devolution of work:

Police departments now hire petite women who cannot physically subdue a violent suspect.
Military branches lower physical standards to accommodate female recruits.
Corporate boards select women for “gender balance,” not merit.
STEM programs receive millions in incentives to boost female enrollment—often at the expense of more qualified men.

This is not competence. This is chaos.

And when things collapse—when the power grid fails, or the rioters breach the gates—it will not be the HR specialist or the DEI officer who restores order. It will be the men, with shovels and guns, returning to do the job they were always called to do.

A Return to Biblical Division of Labor

The answer is not for women to be “paid more.” The answer is for women to return to the sphere where they are most powerful: the home.

“That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home…”
— Titus 2:4–5

The house is a kingdom. The wife is a queen—not of commerce, but of nurture, beauty, and order. She governs her children. She blesses her husband. She builds generational strength.

Let the man go to the field. Let the woman tend the hearth. This is not oppression. This is the Great Order.

V. Historical Context: The Household Economy

Before the Corporate World

In pre-industrial society, men and women worked together, not in separate economic spheres. A man might be a farmer, a blacksmith, a baker—and his wife would assist, manage, and contribute as part of the household economy.

But she did not have a “career.” She did not “negotiate her salary.” She built alongside her husband and trained daughters to do the same.

Even in the early 1800s, most women worked at home, not for strangers. The Industrial Revolution, and later, World War II, lured women out of the household and into factories. The state encouraged it. The corporations rewarded it. And the family collapsed.

The Result of Two-Income Households

What have we gained?

Broken homes: Dual-income families mean less time, less unity, less order.
Struggling men: Young men are displaced, under-employed, and depressed.
Higher costs: Inflation adjusted to double incomes—so now it requires two incomes just to survive.
Weakened faith: Church attendance, family worship, and Christian education suffer.

The world told women to “lean in.” And they did. Right off a cliff.

VI. Where Do We Go from Here?

Men Must Lead, Not Compete

Christian men must stop arguing with feminist logic. Stop trying to “prove” your worth in a rigged system. Stop competing with your wife for income and status.

Rule your house. Provide for your own. Lead with quiet strength.

“But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.”
— 1 Timothy 5:8

Your worth is not in your salary. It is in your stewardship.

Women Must Return Home

If you are a Christian woman reading this, hear this in love:

You were not made to compete with men. You were not made to chase titles, careers, or paychecks. You were made to build a home. To nurture life. To serve God under the headship of a righteous man.

You may earn less. But you will build more.

Let your work be eternal, not transactional.

The Church Must Repent

Many churches have accepted the feminist framework. They praise “working moms,” promote “career ministries,” and boast about “female leadership.”

But the fruit is bitter.

The Church must return to preaching headship, submission, and household dominion. The Church must honor the mother at home as much as the missionary abroad.

Conclusion: There Is No Pay Gap—Only an Order Gap

The lie of the gender pay gap is a smokescreen. It hides the deeper issue: rebellion against order.

Men were made to work and bleed for their homes. Women were made to nurture and beautify their homes. When each walks in obedience, the fruit is peace, strength, and joy.

But when women usurp male roles, and men become passive or resentful, the result is confusion.

There is no wage gap that submission and dominion won’t fix.

Let the feminists rage. Let the government subsidize rebellion. Let the world fall deeper into delusion.

We will build households where men provide, women nurture, and the economy is not built on dollars—but on faithfulness.

Let the Great Order rise.

Soli Deo Gloria.

Politics, Polygamy, Religion, Social Topics

Veiled Glory: The Case for Christian Women Wearing Head Coverings

May 18, 2025 Lord Redbeard 71 Comments

Reclaiming a Forgotten Sign of Order, Honor, and Holy Femininity

In a world obsessed with visibility, defiance, and autonomy, the act of a woman veiling her head in reverence to God’s design is a bold declaration of countercultural obedience. It is not a relic of a bygone era; it is a signpost of heavenly order. For the faithful Christian woman, the head covering is not just fabric. It is a banner of glory, humility, and strength.

This practice, largely abandoned in the modern West, is not cultural baggage to be discarded, but a Biblical mandate to be recovered. For those with ears to hear, the head covering is a call to restore the visible markers of God’s unchanging order in the family and in the church.

I. The Biblical Foundation: 1 Corinthians 11

The clearest instruction regarding head coverings is found in 1 Corinthians 11:2–16, where the Apostle Paul lays out God’s hierarchy and how it is to be visibly displayed in worship.

“But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.” – 1 Corinthians 11:3

The head covering is not about fashion or ancient culture. It is a visual testimony of the divine hierarchy:

God
Christ
Man
Woman

Paul is explicit: a woman covering her head in worship honors her husband (or male head), while an uncovered head dishonors him (v. 5). The covering is a sign of submission, just as a man’s uncovered head honors Christ.

“For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.” – 1 Corinthians 11:10

This strange and often overlooked phrase points to the spiritual weight of the head covering. It is not just social. It is angelic, cosmic, and theological. The covering is a sign of authority, not of weakness. It signifies the woman’s place under God’s order, and her access to God’s power.

Paul never roots this command in culture, but in creation:

“For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man… For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head.” – 1 Corinthians 11:8–10

The argument is grounded in Genesis, not in Greco-Roman fashion. Paul appeals to the created distinction between man and woman as permanent, not transient. The covering is a symbolic affirmation of that order.

II. The Practical Purpose: Visible Submission and Reverent Femininity

Why is this necessary?

Because submission is not just a private heart posture. It is a public confession. In the gathered assembly of saints, where Christ is proclaimed, prayers are lifted, and spiritual authority is exercised—symbols matter. Just as baptism signifies union with Christ, and the Lord’s Supper proclaims His death, so the head covering visibly proclaims that the woman understands and honors her God-ordained place.

In a culture where rebellion is glamorized and androgyny is celebrated; the covered head is a form of holy protest. It testifies:

That woman is not autonomous.
That man is her head under Christ.
That gender distinction is beautiful and good.
That reverence, not assertion, is the glory of femininity.

The modern church may have abandoned the practice, but Paul’s words remain unchanged. The woman who obeys them displays her glory in submission, not in visibility.

“For the woman is the glory of the man.” – 1 Corinthians 11:7

Her head is not unveiled to project herself; it is veiled to proclaim God’s order.

III. The Historical Witness: 2,000 Years of Christian Practice

Until the 20th century, head coverings were universally practiced by Christian women across cultures and denominations. From the early church to the Puritans, from the Eastern Orthodox to the Anabaptists, the testimony is unanimous.

Early Church Fathers affirmed it:

Tertullian (3rd century) wrote that women should cover not only in worship but habitually, saying: “She ought to be veiled not only in the church but in every place.”
John Chrysostom (4th century) taught that the veil was not about shame, but honor.

The Reformers upheld it:

John Calvin argued that the veil was not optional, saying: “If women show their hair in public, they blur the line between sexes.”

Historic Protestantism taught it:

The Puritans considered the veil part of reverent worship.
Early American churches saw it as basic Christian modesty.

It was only in the mid-20th century, with the rise of feminism and the sexual revolution, that the head covering all but disappeared from most churches—especially in the West. It was not theology that changed. It was cultural compromise.

IV. The Modern Objections Answered

Many Christians today dismiss head coverings with several common objections. But these fail the test of Scripture, logic, and history.

“It was cultural, not eternal.”

Paul explicitly grounds his teaching in creation, not culture (1 Corinthians 11:8–9). He does not say, “This is Corinthian custom.” He says, “This is because of God’s design.”

Furthermore, if we say head coverings were cultural, we must also throw out:

Male headship (v. 3)
The role of angels (v. 10)
Gender distinctions in hair and clothing (v. 14–15)

The logic unravels. To deny the veil as a permanent sign is to open the door to denying headship itself.

“The hair is the covering.”

Paul distinguishes between two coverings in the same passage:

The hair is a woman’s natural covering, her glory (v. 15).
The veil or fabric is an additional covering during worship (v. 6).

If hair alone were sufficient, Paul would not say:

“If a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off.” – 1 Corinthians 11:6

This makes no sense if the hair is the covering. Rather, Paul treats them separately—natural hair as a permanent covering, and a veil as a voluntary sign of submission in worship.

“We are not under law.”

Correct—we are not justified by law. But this is not about legalism. It is about order and obedience. The same Paul who wrote Romans also wrote 1 Corinthians. Grace does not negate commands—it empowers obedience.

V. The Symbolism of the Veil: Modesty, Mystery, and Beauty

The head covering is not a sign of inferiority. It is a sign of sacred distinction. Just as the Ark of the Covenant was veiled, just as the Holy of Holies was hidden behind the curtain, so the godly woman covers her glory in reverence to her God and head.

It is not to hide beauty, but to sanctify it.

It is not to suppress the woman, but to exalt her role in God’s design.

Where the world says, “Show yourself,” the veil says, “Glory withheld is glory magnified.” Where the feminist says, “I answer to no one,” the covered woman says, “I honor my husband, and in doing so, I honor Christ.”

The veil is a quiet thunderclap of defiance against the rebellion of our age.

VI. The Practical Application: When and How Should Women Cover?

Biblically, the covering is explicitly required “when praying or prophesying” (1 Corinthians 11:5). This implies:

During worship
During any time of vocal public prayer or exhortation
Possibly during private devotion, though this is less clear

Many women choose to wear a covering throughout the day, especially when around others, as a constant testimony of their submission and womanhood. Others wear it during church services or prayer meetings. The key is not the frequency but the faithfulness of the sign.

The type of covering is not specified, but modesty and clarity are key. It should be obvious that the woman is veiling her head, not accessorizing.

Common options include:

Soft veils or mantillas
Simple scarves or wraps
Bonnets or snoods in traditional styles

The goal is not fashion, but reverence.

VII. The Witness of the Veil in a Rebellious Culture

In a day when gender confusion, sexual rebellion, and feminist ideology dominate every sphere, the sight of a woman quietly covering her head in submission to God and her husband is a sermon in itself.

It testifies:

That gender is not fluid.
That headship is not abuse, it is glory.
That woman’s power lies not in asserting equality, but in embracing design.
That the created order is still good, still binding, and still beautiful.

The woman who covers her head tells the world: “I belong to God, and I honor His order.”

This witness is not loud, but it is unmistakable.

VIII. The Restoration of Order Begins in the Home and the Church

When women veil their heads in obedience to Scripture, they help restore the visible, embodied order of God’s kingdom. They remind men of their duty to lead. They encourage other women to return to submission and modesty. They bless their children with a visual testimony of God’s good design.

“Let all things be done decently and in order.” – 1 Corinthians 14:40

Order is not legalism. It is beauty. And the veil is a token of that order.

In an age of confusion, God is raising up women of clarity. Women who are not afraid to be seen as old-fashioned. Women who understand that a covered head is a covered heart, a heart that fears the Lord.

Conclusion: The Covered Head as a Crown of Honor

The woman who veils her head does not lose her dignity—she displays it.

She does not hide in shame; she stands in honor.

She does not follow man, she obeys God.

Let the churches return to obedience. Let the women return to reverence. Let the covered head return—not as a legalistic burden, but as a joyful sign of restored glory.

For in covering her head, the Christian woman declares with her life:

“I receive my place. I honor my head. I magnify my Lord.”

Let her be praised.

Health, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

The State Is Not Your Shepherd

May 16, 2025 Lord Redbeard 24 Comments

Why Christians Must Reject Welfare and Government Dependency

In our age of moral collapse and bureaucratic bloat, the godly man must ask a pressing question: Who is my provider? Is it God, or government? Is it the household, or the welfare office? Is it the family, or the bureaucrat?

The answer cuts to the heart of The Great Order. A people cannot serve two masters. A man cannot declare Christ as King and Caesar as provider. A household cannot be ruled by the Spirit of God and subsidized by the spirit of Mammon. The time has come to declare war on every form of statist dependence that has poisoned the modern Christian household.

I. The Biblical Order: Family First, Church Second, State Last

From Genesis to Revelation, Scripture paints a clear picture of responsibility and provision. God did not design the civil government to feed, clothe, educate, or shelter His people. He gave that task to fathers, mothers, extended families, and local churches. The household, not the bureaucracy, is the backbone of civilization.

“But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” – 1 Timothy 5:8

In God’s economy:

The father is the head and provider of his house.
The mother is the manager and nourisher of the home.
The church is the safety net for widows, orphans, and the truly destitute.
The state is the sword-bearer to punish evildoers, not the cradle of economic provision (Romans 13:4).

When a man abdicates his provision to the state, he is not just making a financial decision—he is committing spiritual treason. He trades the glory of fatherhood for a government handout. He forfeits his role as king and priest for the pity of politicians.

II. Government Welfare Is a False Gospel

At its core, welfare is not just a system, it is a rival religion. It preaches a gospel of dependency, promises salvation through taxation, and delivers counterfeit mercy through coercion.

Instead of calling men to repentance and labor, it pays them to remain idle. Instead of rewarding marriage and family order, it penalizes it. Instead of honoring multi-generational households, it fractures them. Instead of strengthening churches, it replaces them.

“The borrower is servant to the lender.” – Proverbs 22:7

Dependency on the state is slavery in slow motion. Every welfare check is a chain. Every food stamp a leash. Every subsidy an invitation to forget the God who gives bread in the wilderness.

The state offers welfare the same way Pharaoh offered leeks and garlic, at the price of freedom. It is a bribe to keep men quiet, families broken, and churches irrelevant.

III. Welfare Destroys the Household Economy

Welfare does not empower families, it destroys them. In the United States, federal welfare programs exploded in the 1960s with the promise to help the poor. But instead of lifting up the needy, they shattered the most vulnerable institution: the family.

In 1965, Black illegitimacy was around 25%. Today, it is over 70%—driven by fatherless homes, subsidized by welfare.
Welfare incentivizes single motherhood, discourages marriage, and punishes intact households through income-based penalties.
Men are driven out of the home so that women can qualify for more benefits.
Children grow up under the authority of social workers, not fathers.
The church, once the pillar of community charity, has become silent and sidelined.

This is not compassion. It is conquest. It is the intentional dismantling of Biblical order through dependency economics.

When God’s design for provision is reversed, families suffer, masculinity withers, and matriarchal welfare bureaucracies fill the vacuum.

IV. Early America: Strength Without Subsidy

The myth of government provision is a modern delusion. For most of human history, people survived—not through the state, but through strong households, churches, and communities.

In colonial and early American history:

Fathers worked land, ran shops, or practiced trades to feed their families.
Mothers cultivated gardens, made bread, and taught their children at home.
Children worked alongside parents, contributing from a young age.
Churches provided for widows, hosted communal meals, and cared for the poor directly—without a dime from Washington.
Communities helped each other in times of need without expecting bureaucratic intervention.

These families were poor by today’s standards, but they were rich in faith, discipline, and self-sufficiency. They raised warriors, not wards. They built churches, not case files. And when hard times came, they pulled together—not to vote for handouts, but to work, pray, and rebuild.

No Social Security. No food stamps. No unemployment insurance. And yet—they survived. Because they believed in God, not government.

V. Welfare Undermines the Fear of God

A man who fears God will work, give, and take responsibility. A man who trusts in the state will drift, consume, and make excuses.

Government dependency erodes moral character. It teaches men to expect something for nothing. It enables sloth. It undermines discipline. It feeds entitlement.

“If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat.” – 2 Thessalonians 3:10

This is not cruelty. It is mercy. God’s law commands compassion—but it never authorizes laziness. The man who chooses idleness over labor should feel hunger—not because society is heartless, but because the hunger will drive him to repent and work.

Government support short-circuits this repentance. It allows a man to remain in sin while avoiding consequences. It teaches him to blame systems instead of fearing God.

A household built on government subsidy is not neutral—it is spiritually compromised.

VI. What About the Truly Needy?

Some will object: What about the widow? The orphan? The disabled?

Scripture answers clearly: such people are to be cared for by families first, churches second.

“Honor widows who are truly widows… But if any believing woman has relatives who are widows, let her care for them. Let the church not be burdened…” – 1 Timothy 5:3,16

This is God’s triage:

Let sons and daughters care for their parents.
Let extended family support the weak.
Let the church provide charity with accountability.
Only in the most exceptional of circumstances should civil aid even be considered—and never through centralized, pagan, tax-funded systems.

We must rebuild these structures. Let the church revive the diaconate. Let households create storehouses of food and savings. Let brothers and sisters bind together in mutual aid.

The answer to poverty is not more government—it is more order.

VII. Why Modern Christians Compromise

So why do so many professing Christians continue to feed at the government trough?

Fear: They fear hardship and don’t trust God to provide through family or labor.
Laziness: They prefer ease over effort.
Deception: They’ve been told welfare is a form of “justice.”
Worldliness: They no longer think like the Kingdom of God but like the kingdoms of men.

But in every case, the underlying problem is a failure of faith. They trust the bureaucracy more than the Bible. They believe the promise of politicians more than the promises of God.

“Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart turns away from the Lord.” – Jeremiah 17:5

The curse of statism is not just national—it is personal. It erodes a man’s soul, weakens his household, and places his children under the thumb of a rival authority.

VIII. Restoring Biblical Provision: The Path Forward

So what must be done?

1. Patriarchs Must Provide

Every Christian man must repent of passivity and take up the mantle of provision. He must labor with his hands, work with dignity, and build a household economy that does not need the state.

Even in hardship, he must refuse dependency. He must teach his sons to produce, not consume. He must store, save, plant, and build—so that his household is resilient and righteous.

2. Wives Must Rule the Kitchen, Not the Debit Card

Many modern women are complicit in statism through consumerism and waste. A godly wife must learn to stretch meals, preserve food, garden, and practice old-world frugality. She must reject the lie that government benefits are a form of “help” and embrace the glory of true provision under her husband’s leadership.

3. Churches Must Recover Charity and Discipline

The early church cared for its poor through structured accountability (Acts 6). The modern church must stop outsourcing compassion to Caesar and reclaim the ministry of mercy. That includes screening needs, requiring repentance, involving families, and calling men to responsibility.

4. Reject the Idolatry of Safety Nets

The Christian life is not safe. It is sacrificial. The patriarch must embrace risk, toil, and the potential for difficulty. He must teach his children that God provides through His order, not through the welfare state.

Let your household be known for its strength—not its benefits.

IX. Final Charge: Choose This Day Whom You Will Serve

It is time to draw a line in the sand.

You cannot build The Great Order with one hand in God’s Word and the other in the government treasury. You cannot preach Christ’s lordship while living off Caesar’s crumbs. You cannot restore patriarchy while letting the state nurse your children.

“Choose you this day whom ye will serve… but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” – Joshua 24:15

This is not just a spiritual declaration. It is a material separation. It means walking away from dependency. It means breaking ties with the state. It means building real provision through faith, labor, family, and the church.

Let the world call it foolish. Let your peers call it extreme.

But when the next collapse comes—when the digital IDs are issued, the food supply is choked, the money is controlled, and the freedom to dissent is revoked—it will be the man who trusted God and ruled his house who will stand firm.

His barns will be full. His children will be secure. His conscience will be clear. And his legacy will remain.

Because he did not bow to Pharaoh. He did not sell his household to the state. He did not wait for permission to obey God.

He stood.

Let that man be you.

History, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

She Shall Not Go Out Alone: The Biblical Mandate for Female Guarding

May 14, 2025 Lord Redbeard 17 Comments

“Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”
— Genesis 2:24

“For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and He is the saviour of the body.”
— Ephesians 5:23

In this rebellious age of self-assertion and female autonomy, the biblical household finds itself under siege. No doctrine is more scorned than headship. No principle more despised than the godly husband’s right and responsibility to guard his wife.

Modern society prizes what it calls “freedom” — by which it means unaccountability, detachment, and the rejection of authority. It champions the “independent woman” who comes and goes without consultation, who maintains separate relationships, and who “needs space.” But this is not God’s design. This is disorder. It is a breach in the wall.

Let the feminists howl. Let the world mock. Let even the church recoil. Yet let the righteous man stand unmoved by their storm. For the Scriptures declare plainly: the woman is not to go out alone. She is not to have a private world. She is not to maintain independent lines of communication. Her head is her husband — always, everywhere, in all things.

This is not control. This is covenantal covering. This is love in strength. This is divine architecture.

I. The Principle of Male Guardianship: Built into Creation

From the beginning, woman was not made to stand alone. She was not made to roam or lead or govern herself. She was made from man, for man, and under man.

“Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.”
— 1 Corinthians 11:9

She was brought to him — not released into independence. From her creation in Eden to her bearing of children, she is defined relationally, vocationally, and spiritually by the man she is given to. And what is the husband’s role in this order? To protect, guard, and govern.

When Adam failed to be present, when he let the serpent speak to Eve unobserved, unchecked, unchallenged, sin entered the world. Eve should not have been alone. She should not have been speaking with another. She should have been with her head, under his watch, in his presence.

The lesson is eternal: when the woman wanders, the serpent speaks.

II. Scriptural Pattern: Women Are to Remain Within the Household Sphere

“That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,
To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.”
— Titus 2:4–5

The Word of God is clear: young women are to be keepers at home — not travelers, not social butterflies, not independent agents.

The Greek phrase here translated “keepers at home” (oikourous) literally means house-guardians — implying not only physical location but focus and commitment. The woman’s realm is the home. Her loyalty is to the household. Her physical and relational movement is to be governed by her husband’s will, not her own.

When Rebekah became Isaac’s wife, she was brought into his tent (Genesis 24:67). When Ruth followed Naomi, she did not operate alone in the fields — Boaz specifically charged the men not to touch her, and the servant supervised her gleaning (Ruth 2:8–9).

In no case in Scripture do we see godly women going about alone, forging their own connections, or initiating private relationships — especially not with men. Where that occurs, disaster follows.

Think of Dinah, the daughter of Jacob.

“And Dinah… went out to see the daughters of the land.”
— Genesis 34:1

This small act of independence — “just going out” — led to her defilement by Shechem and the eventual bloodshed of the entire city. Dinah should not have gone out. She should have been kept. She should have remained under the eye of her father and brothers. But she left the walls of order, and chaos followed.

III. Communication Is Presence — The Husband Must Be Included

In our modern digital age, we must understand that communication is presence. Texting, messaging, and private conversations with others — even family and friends — carry the same spiritual risks as physical absence.

Just as a wife should not be wandering the streets without her husband, so too should she not be carrying on private messages, unchecked emotional exchanges, or long conversations without his oversight.

“Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak… and if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home.”
— 1 Corinthians 14:34–35

Though this instruction concerns public worship, it reflects a broader principle: when a woman desires to speak or ask, she is to go through her husband. Not pastors, not friends, not family. Her voice is heard through him. He is her covering.

This extends to online platforms, phone calls, and texts. No communication should be shielded from her husband. There is no righteous secrecy in marriage. Her husband must have unfettered access to all messages, all social media, all points of contact.

Why? Because Eve speaks to the serpent in the absence of Adam.

It begins with “harmless” conversation. It ends in ruin.

IV. Historical Witness: Women Were Kept and Guarded

Throughout church history and in nearly every righteous civilization, women were not allowed to come and go freely. Their movements were tied to their husbands or fathers. This was not oppression. It was protection — and it was honored.

In ancient Israel, women were generally only seen in public under the oversight of their male head.
In early Christian society, it was scandalous for a woman to speak to men alone or appear in public without headcovering and male escort.
During the Reformation, the role of the wife was renewed as “lady of the house,” not “citizen of the world.” Her place was the hearth, not the marketplace.
In Puritan England and Colonial America, godly homes required the wife to remain within the sphere of the household, her communications under her husband’s watch.

It was only with the rise of Enlightenment humanism, feminism, and industrial capitalism that the idea of a “free-roaming woman” took root — a departure that has led to divorce, adultery, rebellion, and societal collapse.

Freedom outside of God’s order is not liberty — it is lawlessness.

V. Theology of Dominion: The Husband Is Governor Over His Wife’s Movements

The man is king and priest of his home — but he is also governor.

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.”
— Ephesians 5:22

Submission is not partial. It does not pause when the husband is not physically present. It does not cease in online spaces. The wife’s will is not her own. Her body, her words, her footsteps, and her affiliations are all under the jurisdiction of her lord.

“Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well.”
— 1 Peter 3:6

What would it look like today for a woman to call her husband “lord”? It would look like her not texting others without him reading it. Not going to the store without his knowing. Not receiving counsel or comfort from her mother, sister, or friend before seeking his voice.

This is not insecurity — it is the very essence of covenantal fidelity.

A wife does not exist as an individual in the modern sense. She is one flesh with her husband. Her identity is derived. Her decisions are derivative. Her presence is his presence, and when he is not there physically, his authority must be spiritually and functionally present.

VI. Warnings from the Collapse of Female Guarding

The fruits of female autonomy are rotting on the tree. Consider what happens when wives wander without oversight:

Adultery begins with unguarded access.
The woman who flirts emotionally with a coworker, chats late at night online, or meets someone “just to talk” has already left her head. The serpent has entered the garden.
Family bonds erode.
Wives who retain secret friendships with relatives — often undermining their husbands — divide households. This is how mothers-in-law gain access, how sisters plant doubts, how rebellious daughters spread infection.
Her loyalty fractures.
If a wife can speak freely with others, apart from her husband, she will eventually serve two masters. Her ears will bend toward others. Her thoughts will be split. Her spirit will drift.
The household loses its wall.
Proverbs says a woman who does not remain at home is like a city broken down without walls (cf. Proverbs 25:28). The strength of the home lies in the guardedness of the wife.

VII. But What About Emergencies, Ministry, and Hospitality?

Some may ask, “Is it always wrong for a woman to leave the house alone?” Not necessarily. There are times when a wife may go about — but it must always be:

With her husband’s explicit blessing,
For a clearly defined purpose,
Within a fixed time and covered accountability,
And with a heart that longs to return home.

Just as a soldier may leave the walls of the city on assignment but not in desertion, so too may a wife step outside for a season — but never as a wanderer.

And ministry? Hospitality? These, too, are under his governance. The wife does not entertain others, serve others, or engage others apart from her lord’s knowledge and participation. Even the Proverbs 31 woman — often misquoted to justify female independence — acts within the sphere of her husband’s trust, “The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her” (Proverbs 31:11).

Her strength is not in autonomy — it is in order.

VIII. A Word to Wives: Your Safety Is in His Covering

Dear daughter of Zion, understand this: your husband’s watchfulness is not a prison — it is a fortress. His presence, his eyes, his hand, his access — these are your security. They are not limits to resist. They are gifts to embrace.

“He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust.”
— Psalm 91:4

This is the image of godly headship. A protective, holy presence. Like Boaz to Ruth. Like Abraham to Sarah. Like Christ to the Church.

The moment you desire independence, secrecy, or “space,” the serpent is already whispering. Stay within the wall. Delight in your covering. Let no message, no call, no visit, no outing escape your husband’s view. Your purity depends on it.

IX. Let the Great Order Be Restored

We are not called to conform. We are called to rebuild the ancient ruins. To restore the old paths. To reestablish the boundaries our fathers once set. The principle of female guarding — of the wife never being alone or unaccounted for — is not a minor tradition. It is a foundation stone.

“Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.”
— Proverbs 22:28

The Great Order demands it. The war on Christian civilization will not be won with partial obedience. Let our homes be fortified. Let our wives be shielded. Let our daughters be trained to love the presence and protection of their future heads.

We do not need more free-roaming women. We need kept women. Covenant women. Covered women.

Conclusion: The Woman Shall Not Go Out Alone

Let it be said without apology: A wife has no righteous business outside her husband’s knowledge, covering, and presence. She is not to go out alone. She is not to communicate alone. Her life is not her own — it is bound to the man God gave her, as his helpmeet, under his governance.

This is not bondage. It is glory.

This is not weakness. It is honor.

This is not patriarchy gone too far. It is patriarchy finally applied.

Let the home be guarded. Let the wife be covered. Let the serpent find no opportunity.

Let the Great Order rise.

Future, Health, History, Holidays, Politics, Polygamy, Religion, Social Topics

Announcing the Forthcoming Release of “The Great Order” by Lord Redbeard

May 14, 2025 Lord Redbeard 9 Comments

Bold Foundations for Biblical Patriarchy, Masculinity, and Household Dominion

> “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?”

— Psalm 11:3

We stand at the precipice of a collapsing world. The nations rage, the families crumble, the church is compromised, and the people groan under the weight of disorder. Men are passive, women are rebellious and children are untamed. The covenantal design of God’s order has been all but forgotten.

Yet from the ashes, a trumpet has sounded. A clarion call not of man’s wisdom but of divine truth — bold, ancient, and uncompromising.

That trumpet is The Great Order.

This book is not merely a work of writing. It is not a collection of random thoughts. It is a declaration. One forged through the fires of spiritual warfare, personal experience, obedience, and relentless pursuit of the Kingdom of God.

And now, by the providence and grace of the Most High, it is almost here.

A Work Birthed in Fire and Revelation

There are books that entertain, books that educate and books that simply pass the time. The Great Order is none of these. This is not a journalistic commentary on the state of the culture. This is not a casual opinion piece about the family.

This is a blueprint for dominion!

Every word in this book has been wrought through struggle, failure and triumph. Each sentence has been borne through prayer, sharpened through Scripture, and written through conviction. I did not merely choose to write this book, I was compelled, burdened and gripped by the Spirit of God with a vision too weighty to ignore.

> “The word of the Lord was in my heart as a burning fire shut up in my bones…”

— Jeremiah 20:9

I have lived these words, while often failing. I have been humbled by them, corrected by them, and built by them. They were not written in an ivory tower but forged in the trenches of real fatherhood, real household government, and real spiritual war. The Great Order is not theoretical, it is incarnational. It is truth that has been lived, tested, and proven by patriarchs since the beginning of written history.

This book has not been filtered for cultural acceptance. It has not been softened for fragile ears. It is a sword, a plumbline, a trumpet blast for men to rise, women to embrace sacred roles, and families to become embassies of heaven.

Why This Book Is a Threat to the World and a Balm for the Faithful

The world hates order, it mocks patriarchy, it despises submission and tears down hierarchy. This is no accident, Satan’s war has always been against God’s design. At the heart of that design is the household, governed by man, under Christ, filled with fruitful labor, and advancing the Kingdom through generations.

The Great Order is a threat to every demonic stronghold because it restores the very structure the enemy fears most,the Biblical family.

But this book is more than just a rebuke of the present. It is a balm for the faithful, a comfort to the remnant, a light to those wandering in the darkness of feminism, fatherlessness, and confusion. Many have felt the stirrings in their soul that things are not right, that the modern way is broken and that there must be more.

This book puts language to what the Spirit of God has already whispered in many hearts. It is a framework, a vocabulary,a standard.

In a generation that knows the truth instinctively but lacks the words to defend or articulate it, The Great Order gives voice to the righteous yearning buried in every God-fearing man and woman. It bridges the gap between conviction and communication, between the groaning of the soul and the clarity of truth.

Truths We Know But Cannot Articulate — Until Now

There are times when a man knows something is wrong, even though he cannot explain it. He sees a woman preach, and something in him recoils. He watches a child disobey his mother, and he feels disgust, he sees a home led by a career-focused wife and feels instinctively — this is disorder.

But if pressed, he cannot explain it. He cannot defend it, he cannot express it to his wife, to his children, to his church, to his peers. The conscience bears witness to God’s design. But the vocabulary has been stolen.

This is the plight of our generations, men and women raised without the theological framework or historical wisdom to articulate what they sense in their souls. We know disorder when we see it. We feel its destruction, but we have been robbed of the language to name it, and the courage to confront and profess it.

The Great Order restores that language. It articulates what you’ve always known, it puts steel in your spine and precision in your mouth. It enables fathers to teach their sons, it enables husbands to lead their wives, and enables shepherds to guard the flock. This book is not abstract, it is accessible, practical, and potent.

It accomplishes the seemingly impossible: giving form to formless conviction, giving words to what was once only felt. It is the bridge between inner clarity and external boldness.

IV. The Structure of the Great Order: A Manual for Reconstruction

This is not a book of feelings. It is not a devotional. It is a war manual.

The Great Order is organized into chapters that walk step-by-step through the rebuilding of Christian civilization:

Biblical Patriarchy — restoring God’s government in the home.

Masculinity — dominion, not indulgence; strength through sacrifice.

Christian Polygyny — a weapon of revival and fruitfulness.

The Role of Women — sacred submission, homemaking, and generational building.

Family Government — fathers as kings, priests, and judges.

Household Economy — families as productive units, not consumers.

Education — indoctrinating children in righteousness.

Resistance — rejecting feminism, statism, and cultural apostasy.

The Church and the Household — integrating worship and dominion.

It doesn’t simply teach why we must return to Biblical order, it shows how. It is intensely practical, designed to be implemented. The principles in this book already form the foundation of households that have rejected compromise and chosen to live by the Law of God.

The Fruit of the Great Order: Revival, Peace, and Restoration

Revival will not come from stadiums, celebrity pastors, or emotional altar calls.

Revival begins at the dinner table!

It begins when a man takes his place as head of his home. When a woman repents of autonomy and embraces her role with joy. When children are trained in obedience, fear of God, and discipline. When homes become churches, the Sabbath is kept, and Scripture governs life.

The Great Order is not just about family. It is about national restoration.This book declares what few are willing to say: that peace cannot come until patriarchy is restored. That harmony cannot come until hierarchy is obeyed. That blessing cannot come until the household is ruled by God’s order.

This is not nostalgia, politics, or moralism, this is covenantal. When men obey the order of heaven, the result is peace on earth.

Children flourish.

Wives rejoice.

Men lead.

The poor are cared for.

The land is healed.

The nations tremble.

This is how we rebuild civilization — not by electing the right leaders, but by raising them in our homes.

A Book for the Centuries to come:

The world writes books for entertainment, and the church writes books to sell but The Great Order was written to last, to stand the test of time.

This is not a trending topic, but a timeless template. It will be as relevant in five hundred years as it is today, because it is built on eternal truth. As long as the Word of God stands — and it will stand forever, this book will be a plumbline for the faithful.

When governments fall, the households guided by this book will remain!

When seminaries apostatize, the sons trained by this book will become shepherds!

When feminism collapses, the daughters raised by this book will rebuild homes!

The Great Order is not a one-generation manual. It is a multi-generational standard. It is written to be passed from father to son, from elder to disciple, from patriarch to patriarch. It is the blueprint for God’s covenant people to restore the ancient paths (Jeremiah 6:16). This book will outlast trends. It will outlast empires. Because it is built on the Rock.

Who This Book Is For

This book is not for everyone. It is not for cowards. It is not for cultural Christians. It is not for women who want to control men or men who fear responsibility.

This book is for fathers ready to rule their homes, wives ready to be crowned with honor,

sons ready to build legacies, daughters ready to prepare for homemaking. It is for shepherds ready to reform their flocks, remnant believers ready to live counter-culturally, and seekers ready to repent and submit to God’s order.

If you are tired of the lies. If you know there’s more. If you feel the conviction but lack the clarity. If you want to plant trees under whose shade your great-grandchildren will sit — then this book is for you.

What to Expect in the Coming Release

The release of The Great Order will be more than a publication. It will be a launch. A declaration of war. A rallying point for households across the earth who are tired of compromise and ready to build.

The book will be released in softcover initially, with hardcover, audiobook, and digital formats planned for the near future. This is more than a book. It is a movement.

The website LordRedbeard.com will serve as the command center — featuring articles, updates, resources, and an ever-growing library or resources for covenant households.

Let the Patriarchs Rise

We are not waiting for revival, we are building it. We are not waiting for the world to wake up, we are establishing households that shine as light in the darkness. We are not waiting for permission, we have a mandate.

God is raising up a remnant of men — fathers, brothers, sons — who will not bow to Baal. They will not kneel to feminism, and will not compromise with the world.

They will build, marry, multiply and they will reign!

And when the Lord returns, He will find not a scattered, weak, feminized people — but an ordered people. A governed people. A glorious bride.

The Great Order is the trumpet.

The time for excuses is over.

Let the patriarchs rise.

Let the women rejoice in their submission and glory.

Let the children be trained as arrows.

Let the households become kingdoms.

Let the dominion begin.

Are you ready?

The Great Order is coming, get your house ready, train your sons, teach your daughters, insure that your name is found among the builders!

Prepare your household, clear your calendar, sharpen your mind and fortify your heart.

The time has come.

The standard has been raised.

The restoration has begun.

Let the Great Order rise and be restored!

Soli Deo Gloria.

History, Politics, Social Topics

Why a Woman Must Always Be Under Headship: The Unbreakable Design of God

May 12, 2025 Lord Redbeard 16 Comments

Modern Christianity has adopted many lies, but none more destructive than the idea that a woman can, and should, be autonomous. The culture prizes the “independent woman.” The church parrots the same mantra in softer tones. But Scripture knows nothing of this. God never created women to stand alone. She was made for order, and she flourishes under headship.

A woman is required by God to be under male authority at all times, from her father’s house, to her husband’s house, and in some cases under the governance of church elders. This is not optional. It is not conditional. It is not a matter of preference. It is a covenantal design, etched into creation and enforced by divine command.

“But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man…”
— 1 Corinthians 11:3

This structure is not cultural, it is creational. It is not bondage, it is blessing. And when it is violated, chaos, heartbreak, and destruction follow.

I. Headship in Creation: Woman Was Made for the Man

We must begin where God begins: in Genesis. Adam was made first, formed from the dust by the breath of God. He was given a mission—to take dominion. But God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” (Genesis 2:18)

The woman was not made as a co-leader. She was not designed as an independent entity to explore her identity. She was made for the man, from the man, and to the man.

“For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.”
— 1 Corinthians 11:8–9

This is the creation order, and it never changes. A woman, by nature and design, must be under the loving rule of godly headship. When she is, she is protected, fruitful, and secure. When she is not, she is vulnerable, unstable, and easy prey for deception.

This is not conjecture. This is exactly what happened in Eden.

II. The Fall: What Happens When Headship Is Abandoned

In Genesis 3, the serpent bypassed the man and went to the woman. He inverted God’s order. And Adam, instead of protecting and ruling, abdicated his role. Eve was deceived. Adam was derelict. And humanity fell.

“And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.”
— 1 Timothy 2:14

This is not an insult to women, it is a divine warning. When a woman steps outside of headship, she is in danger. When a man steps away from authority, he invites judgment.

Headship is not a human construct. It is a spiritual defense system, and when it is removed, the home collapses, the culture deteriorates, and the church weakens.

III. A Woman’s Three Primary Headships

Biblically, a woman is to be under male authority throughout the entire course of her life:

1. The Father

“And ye shall teach them your children, speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house…”
— Deuteronomy 11:19

From birth, a girl is under the governance of her father. He is to train her, protect her, and guard her purity. He is responsible to keep her from danger—whether moral, spiritual, or relational.

In Numbers 30, God gives laws governing the vows of women. If a daughter makes a vow and her father hears it and disallows it, the vow is nullified. Why? Because she is under his jurisdiction.

“If a woman also vow a vow unto the Lord, and bind herself by a bond… being in her father’s house… and her father disallow her… then shall the Lord forgive her.”
— Numbers 30:3–5

This is legal headship. Fathers are not optional. They are God’s appointed guardians for daughters.

2. The Husband

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife…”
— Ephesians 5:22–23

When a woman marries, headship passes from father to husband. She is no longer her father’s responsibility. She becomes her husband’s charge, and she is to obey him as the church obeys Christ.

“Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord.”
— 1 Peter 3:6

This is not poetic, it is prescriptive. A woman does not lose value under authority; she gains security, direction, and honor.

3. The Eldership (in cases of widowhood, orphanhood, etc.)

When a woman has no husband and no father, she is not to drift alone. She comes under the elders of the church, the patriarchs of the community.

“Honour widows that are widows indeed… Let not a widow be taken into the number under threescore years old, having been the wife of one man…”
— 1 Timothy 5:3–9

The early church had rules and order for widows, indicating that even in their singleness, they were not to function independently. They were under the governance of the patriarchal church, and the younger widows were exhorted to remarry (1 Timothy 5:14).

IV. The Dangers of Female Autonomy

When women are not under headship, the results are devastating:

Sexual sin abounds. Young women without oversight are easy prey for seduction and fornication.
Feminism takes root. Women begin to believe they are their own authority.
Children are raised fatherless. Single mothers often reject correction and multiply generational disorder.
Churches are disrupted. Uncovered women bring emotional chaos and spiritual confusion.

“Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!”
— Isaiah 5:21

Headship is not oppression. It is protection. It keeps a woman from the deceit of Satan and the judgment of God.

V. What About Special Cases?

1. The Divorced Woman

Divorce does not grant a woman independence. It places her in a vulnerable state, one that Scripture addresses soberly. If the divorce was lawful (on grounds of adultery or abandonment by an unbeliever, Matthew 5:32, 1 Corinthians 7:15), she may remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. But she is not now a “free agent.”

She should:

Come under patriarchal church leadership for spiritual covering.
Pursue re-marriage if it is biblically permitted.
Raise children in submission to godly counsel.

She is not the head of her house. If she has sons, they must be trained under male discipleship. If she has daughters, they must be shielded from repeating her mistakes.

2. The Widow: Still in Need of Covering

Widowhood is not an exception to God’s established order. Though the husband has passed, the woman’s need for headship remains. Scripture makes it clear: no woman, regardless of age or circumstance, is ever meant to live without covering.

Young Widows: Called to Remarry

Paul gives direct instruction in 1 Timothy 5:14:

“I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.”

Young widows are not to remain alone, idle, or without direction. Paul warns that widows who remain uncovered are easily drawn into gossip, idleness, and temptation (v. 13). Remarriage is a divinely appointed path back into structure, protection, and fruitful labor within a man’s household. Headship is not optional for young widows, it is necessary for their holiness and the Church’s honor.

Older Widows: Honored, Not Autonomous

Older widows, those proven in faith and good works, are to be honored by the Church (1 Timothy 5:3, 9–10), yet they are still not independent. They remain under the spiritual covering of the church body and its male leadership. Their new role becomes one of discipleship, as Paul outlines in Titus 2:3–5:

“The aged women… that they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children… obedient to their own husbands.”

They are not liberated from order; rather, they become defenders and instructors of it.

Temporary Submission to Godly Headship

In cases where remarriage is delayed or not immediately possible, a widow may willingly submit herself to the oversight of a godly male relative, elder, or spiritual father. This kind of voluntary submission reflects the principle of headship and preserves her covering until a new marriage is rightly formed. Just as Ruth submitted herself to Boaz’s authority and provision before becoming his wife (Ruth 2:8–12), so too may a widow dwell under the shadow of a righteous man’s protection, so long as it is done in purity and order.

Never Without a Head

The Church is also called to care for and govern widows, not simply offer charity but oversight (James 1:27). A woman without a husband must not drift into spiritual autonomy. She must remain accountable and under the rule of godly men, either through remarriage or temporary oversight by the elders or righteous male leadership in her life.

The death of a husband is not the death of God’s design. Headship is not a marriage feature, it is a feminine necessity. Widowhood is a shift in placement, not a suspension of submission.

No woman, including the widow, is ever meant to be her own authority. God’s pattern does not break in crisis, it stands unshaken.

3. The Orphaned or Unmarried Daughter of a Non-Christian Home

A young woman raised outside of the faith must not interpret her background as justification for independence. If her father is unbelieving, she must:

Submit under spiritual fathers, church elders, pastors, or godly men in the community.
Pursue biblical courtship under spiritual authority, not casual dating or autonomy.
Be adopted into the household of God, where she is no longer a lone sheep but part of a covenant flock.

Even in pagan cultures, daughters were understood to belong to their fathers until given in marriage. The modern Western idea that a woman is “on her own” at 18 is rebellion disguised as liberty.

VI. Historical Witness

Throughout Church history, the principle of continuous female headship was unquestioned:

In early Israel, a daughter’s virginity was the father’s responsibility (Deuteronomy 22:13–21).
In medieval Christendom, daughters could not marry without paternal approval, and widows were overseen by church authorities.
Reformers like John Calvin and Martin Luther emphasized the father’s authority in arranging godly marriages and condemned female independence as prideful and disorderly.
Puritan families in early America treated daughters as part of the household government until they were transferred in marriage.

It is only in recent history, with the rise of Enlightenment individualism and second-wave feminism, that we see the normalization of female autonomy, a disaster for faith, family, and civilization.

VII. The Blessing of Headship

When a woman is properly covered by male headship, the result is fruitfulness, peace, and joy.

She does not carry the burden of spiritual leadership.
She is defended from predators and wolves.
She is directed in righteousness.
She is shielded from emotional instability and deception.
She glorifies God by knowing her place and delighting in it.

This is not humiliation, it is holy order. It is not shameful, it is sacred.

“Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.”
— 1 Timothy 2:11

This kind of subjection brings honor, protection, and praise. A woman who abides under headship is a builder of nations, a nurturer of kings, and a daughter of Sarah.

Conclusion: Always Covered, Always Blessed

The lie of female autonomy has destroyed generations. It has produced bitterness, barrenness, fatherlessness, and faithlessness. But the Lord calls women back, not to self-rule, but to submission.

Whether a daughter, a wife, a widow, or a woman rescued from the ruins of rebellion, every godly woman must be under righteous headship at all times.

Fathers, cover your daughters.
Husbands, lead your wives.
Elders, shepherd the uncovered.
And women, rejoice to be ruled.

You were not made to be alone. You were made to be covered.
And under that covering, you will be blessed, fruitful, protected, and glorified.Let the feminists rage.
Let the church grow bold.
Let the Great Order be restored, one household at a time.

History, Politics, Religion, Social Topics

Cats Instead of Children: The Consequences of Careerism

May 12, 2025 Lord Redbeard 12 Comments

In the modern West, a striking symbol of cultural inversion is the image of the single, professional woman cradling a cat rather than a child. It’s not merely a humorous meme—it’s a sociological reality that reflects a deep shift in values, priorities, and understanding of womanhood.

The Career as a New Identity

For much of human history, a woman’s primary domain was the household—a place of immense dignity, productivity, and influence. She nurtured life, shaped souls, and stewarded the future of her lineage. But with the rise of feminism and the industrial-technocratic model of life, women were told that their value could only be found outside the home. They were sold the idea that true fulfillment comes through career advancement, salary increases, and corporate achievements.

In this paradigm, children—especially young ones—are seen not as blessings, but as burdens. They are interruptions to productivity, threats to “freedom,” and liabilities to a woman’s upward mobility. The result? Delayed marriage, widespread infertility, and plummeting birthrates. Instead of lullabies, the halls of modern apartments echo with the meows of feline companions.

Cats Require No Sacrifice

A child requires immense sacrifice. Sleepless nights, constant attention, financial commitment, and the long, slow work of shaping another soul. It demands laying down one’s life daily. But a cat is convenient. Feed it, give it a litter box, and carry on with your life. It offers companionship without the demand of legacy. It scratches the emotional itch without requiring covenant or continuity.

This trade—life for lifestyle—is perhaps the clearest indictment of modern womanhood. In choosing cats over children, many have traded motherhood for momentary comfort. But cats don’t carry on a name. They don’t build households. They don’t honor their mother in old age or bear grandchildren.

The Feminist Promise Was a Lie

Feminism promised women “choice”—but in practice, it shamed traditional motherhood and elevated careerism as the only path to worth. The woman who chooses to bear many children, keep a home, and support her husband is often mocked as “wasting her potential.” Meanwhile, the woman who climbs the corporate ladder, drinks wine alone, and has a cat to come home to is celebrated by media as empowered.

But empowerment has come at a steep cost. Millions of women now find themselves in their 30s and 40s—lonely, childless, and deeply unfulfilled. Their fertility has faded, their relationships have withered, and their youth has been spent chasing the approval of bosses who replaced them with younger workers without a second thought.

A Culture Without Children Is a Dying Culture

When women stop having children, a nation stops having a future. The cat-as-child phenomenon is not just a personal tragedy—it’s a civilizational crisis. No generation can continue if its women reject the role of life-bearer. The womb, once seen as sacred, is now suppressed through pills, surgeries, and ideologies. But biology doesn’t bend to ideology. A woman’s body longs to nurture life, and when that drive is denied, it finds twisted replacements—whether through animals, activism, or artificial distractions.

The Path Back: Restoring the Dignity of Womanhood

The answer is not to shame women, but to call them back to glory. True femininity is not found in boardrooms or cubicles—it is found in the embrace of a newborn, the aroma of bread in the oven, the warmth of a family shaped by a wise and joyful mother. Careers can be replaced; children cannot. Promotions are temporary; legacy is eternal.

A godly woman does not need to prove herself by mimicking men. She flourishes in her God-given role as life-giver, nurturer, and queen of the home. This is not oppression. It is sacred dominion.

Lord Redbeard

Category Archives: Politics

News Sources

Pages

Catagories

Suggested Podcasts