Veiled Glory: The Case for Christian Women Wearing Head Coverings

Reclaiming a Forgotten Sign of Order, Honor, and Holy Femininity

In a world obsessed with visibility, defiance, and autonomy, the act of a woman veiling her head in reverence to God’s design is a bold declaration of countercultural obedience. It is not a relic of a bygone era; it is a signpost of heavenly order. For the faithful Christian woman, the head covering is not just fabric. It is a banner of glory, humility, and strength.

This practice, largely abandoned in the modern West, is not cultural baggage to be discarded, but a Biblical mandate to be recovered. For those with ears to hear, the head covering is a call to restore the visible markers of God’s unchanging order in the family and in the church.

I. The Biblical Foundation: 1 Corinthians 11

The clearest instruction regarding head coverings is found in 1 Corinthians 11:2–16, where the Apostle Paul lays out God’s hierarchy and how it is to be visibly displayed in worship.

“But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.”1 Corinthians 11:3

The head covering is not about fashion or ancient culture. It is a visual testimony of the divine hierarchy:

  • God
  • Christ
  • Man
  • Woman

Paul is explicit: a woman covering her head in worship honors her husband (or male head), while an uncovered head dishonors him (v. 5). The covering is a sign of submission, just as a man’s uncovered head honors Christ.

“For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.”1 Corinthians 11:10

This strange and often overlooked phrase points to the spiritual weight of the head covering. It is not just social. It is angelic, cosmic, and theological. The covering is a sign of authority, not of weakness. It signifies the woman’s place under God’s order, and her access to God’s power.

Paul never roots this command in culture, but in creation:

“For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man… For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head.”1 Corinthians 11:8–10

The argument is grounded in Genesis, not in Greco-Roman fashion. Paul appeals to the created distinction between man and woman as permanent, not transient. The covering is a symbolic affirmation of that order.

II. The Practical Purpose: Visible Submission and Reverent Femininity

Why is this necessary?

Because submission is not just a private heart posture. It is a public confession. In the gathered assembly of saints, where Christ is proclaimed, prayers are lifted, and spiritual authority is exercised—symbols matter. Just as baptism signifies union with Christ, and the Lord’s Supper proclaims His death, so the head covering visibly proclaims that the woman understands and honors her God-ordained place.

In a culture where rebellion is glamorized and androgyny is celebrated; the covered head is a form of holy protest. It testifies:

  • That woman is not autonomous.
  • That man is her head under Christ.
  • That gender distinction is beautiful and good.
  • That reverence, not assertion, is the glory of femininity.

The modern church may have abandoned the practice, but Paul’s words remain unchanged. The woman who obeys them displays her glory in submission, not in visibility.

“For the woman is the glory of the man.”1 Corinthians 11:7

Her head is not unveiled to project herself; it is veiled to proclaim God’s order.

III. The Historical Witness: 2,000 Years of Christian Practice

Until the 20th century, head coverings were universally practiced by Christian women across cultures and denominations. From the early church to the Puritans, from the Eastern Orthodox to the Anabaptists, the testimony is unanimous.

Early Church Fathers affirmed it:

  • Tertullian (3rd century) wrote that women should cover not only in worship but habitually, saying: “She ought to be veiled not only in the church but in every place.”
  • John Chrysostom (4th century) taught that the veil was not about shame, but honor.

The Reformers upheld it:

  • John Calvin argued that the veil was not optional, saying: “If women show their hair in public, they blur the line between sexes.”

Historic Protestantism taught it:

  • The Puritans considered the veil part of reverent worship.
  • Early American churches saw it as basic Christian modesty.

It was only in the mid-20th century, with the rise of feminism and the sexual revolution, that the head covering all but disappeared from most churches—especially in the West. It was not theology that changed. It was cultural compromise.

IV. The Modern Objections Answered

Many Christians today dismiss head coverings with several common objections. But these fail the test of Scripture, logic, and history.

“It was cultural, not eternal.”

Paul explicitly grounds his teaching in creation, not culture (1 Corinthians 11:8–9). He does not say, “This is Corinthian custom.” He says, “This is because of God’s design.”

Furthermore, if we say head coverings were cultural, we must also throw out:

  • Male headship (v. 3)
  • The role of angels (v. 10)
  • Gender distinctions in hair and clothing (v. 14–15)

The logic unravels. To deny the veil as a permanent sign is to open the door to denying headship itself.

“The hair is the covering.”

Paul distinguishes between two coverings in the same passage:

  • The hair is a woman’s natural covering, her glory (v. 15).
  • The veil or fabric is an additional covering during worship (v. 6).

If hair alone were sufficient, Paul would not say:

“If a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off.” – 1 Corinthians 11:6

This makes no sense if the hair is the covering. Rather, Paul treats them separately—natural hair as a permanent covering, and a veil as a voluntary sign of submission in worship.

“We are not under law.”

Correct—we are not justified by law. But this is not about legalism. It is about order and obedience. The same Paul who wrote Romans also wrote 1 Corinthians. Grace does not negate commands—it empowers obedience.


V. The Symbolism of the Veil: Modesty, Mystery, and Beauty

The head covering is not a sign of inferiority. It is a sign of sacred distinction. Just as the Ark of the Covenant was veiled, just as the Holy of Holies was hidden behind the curtain, so the godly woman covers her glory in reverence to her God and head.

It is not to hide beauty, but to sanctify it.

It is not to suppress the woman, but to exalt her role in God’s design.

Where the world says, “Show yourself,” the veil says, “Glory withheld is glory magnified.” Where the feminist says, “I answer to no one,” the covered woman says, “I honor my husband, and in doing so, I honor Christ.”

The veil is a quiet thunderclap of defiance against the rebellion of our age.

VI. The Practical Application: When and How Should Women Cover?

Biblically, the covering is explicitly required “when praying or prophesying” (1 Corinthians 11:5). This implies:

  • During worship
  • During any time of vocal public prayer or exhortation
  • Possibly during private devotion, though this is less clear

Many women choose to wear a covering throughout the day, especially when around others, as a constant testimony of their submission and womanhood. Others wear it during church services or prayer meetings. The key is not the frequency but the faithfulness of the sign.

The type of covering is not specified, but modesty and clarity are key. It should be obvious that the woman is veiling her head, not accessorizing.

Common options include:

  • Soft veils or mantillas
  • Simple scarves or wraps
  • Bonnets or snoods in traditional styles

The goal is not fashion, but reverence.

VII. The Witness of the Veil in a Rebellious Culture

In a day when gender confusion, sexual rebellion, and feminist ideology dominate every sphere, the sight of a woman quietly covering her head in submission to God and her husband is a sermon in itself.

It testifies:

  • That gender is not fluid.
  • That headship is not abuse, it is glory.
  • That woman’s power lies not in asserting equality, but in embracing design.
  • That the created order is still good, still binding, and still beautiful.

The woman who covers her head tells the world: “I belong to God, and I honor His order.”

This witness is not loud, but it is unmistakable.

VIII. The Restoration of Order Begins in the Home and the Church

When women veil their heads in obedience to Scripture, they help restore the visible, embodied order of God’s kingdom. They remind men of their duty to lead. They encourage other women to return to submission and modesty. They bless their children with a visual testimony of God’s good design.

“Let all things be done decently and in order.”1 Corinthians 14:40

Order is not legalism. It is beauty. And the veil is a token of that order.

In an age of confusion, God is raising up women of clarity. Women who are not afraid to be seen as old-fashioned. Women who understand that a covered head is a covered heart, a heart that fears the Lord.


Conclusion: The Covered Head as a Crown of Honor

The woman who veils her head does not lose her dignity—she displays it.

She does not hide in shame; she stands in honor.

She does not follow man, she obeys God.

Let the churches return to obedience. Let the women return to reverence. Let the covered head return—not as a legalistic burden, but as a joyful sign of restored glory.

For in covering her head, the Christian woman declares with her life:

“I receive my place. I honor my head. I magnify my Lord.”

Let her be praised.

71 Comments on "Veiled Glory: The Case for Christian Women Wearing Head Coverings"

  • Thank you for clarifying this topic, I really feel this is the correct perspective to have on this topic.

  • No man is worth having to wear a rag on my head.

  • This is a truth I learned growing up. It’s something I’ve always worn and would happily continue to wear under your headship my Lord.

  • Is this why the jews wear those little beanie’s?

  • I bet all your wives look like cancer patients in chains!

  • Got up at 5am to make my Lord his fresh bread and coffee, then off to milk the cows and harvest the fields, all while wearing my bonnet of course…………..

  • Does an oculus count (asking for a friend)

  • About time someone took time to explain this in detail, and in a moder perspective, without condemnation. Sure the rebellious women will still scoff but let them. This is real Biblical truth written for the 21st century. Keep up the good work. I will be supporting your efforts with a $100.00 per month contribution, I only wish I could afford more, your humble follower, John

  • You are truly a visionary sent by the Lord on high. Your words and hopefully your book will be the pilot the kicks off a true revival in this country, and perhaps around the (round) world.

  • This actually is very reasonable and makes good sense!

  • Honest question: Do hats count?

  • I can live with this, during worship and prayer. Thank you for taking the time to explain.

  • After reading this i’ve decided to just wear a nice southern belle hat, easy to do. and it look nice too.

  • Does my military helmet count as a “headcovering”?

  • These laws were written for another time

  • ROFL, this idiot………………………

  • In today’s broken world, Christians should set themselves apart and be an example for others.

    • Absolutely, and well said. In a world full of confusion and rebellion, Christians are called to be set apart, not just in belief but in visible obedience. Head coverings are one of those quiet yet powerful testimonies; a sign of God’s order, of a woman’s submission to her head, and of the glory she veils in reverence to Christ.

      Thank you for recognizing the importance of being an example. May we all continue to walk boldly and visibly in the commands of our King.

  • John Calvin (Commentary on 1 Corinthians)

    “It is becoming that women should cover their heads in public worship, as the custom of the time dictates. But this practice, like others, may change with circumstances and culture.”

    (Note: Calvin believed the principle of modesty applied, but recognized cultural expressions may vary.)

  • The idea that women must wear literal head coverings today misunderstands the spirit of the passage. God cares more about our hearts than our hats

    • Thank you for sharing your perspective. While it’s true that God cares deeply about the heart, Scripture never sets the heart against obedience. 1 Corinthians 11 speaks clearly about head coverings as a visible symbol of authority and order—not as a cultural relic, but as part of God’s timeless design.

      The spirit of the passage is not an excuse to dismiss its plain instruction. Rather, it calls us to joyful submission, both inwardly and outwardly. In God’s Kingdom, outward symbols often reflect inward realities. Let us honor both.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • You are both wise and hansom, I can’t wait to read your book 💓

  • Reading this blog over the past couple months literally saved my life and my marriage. Thank you for everything you are doing, for taking a stand and being a light in the darkness.

  • In today’s fallen world submissive women should wear head coverings as a public sign of submission to their husband.

    • Exactly. In a world that celebrates rebellion, the head covering stands as a bold and beautiful testimony of a woman’s submission—not to culture, but to her husband and to the Lord’s design.

      It is not a relic of the past, but a signpost of order in a disordered age. When worn with conviction, it preaches louder than many sermons: God’s ways are higher, and His order still stands.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • ME TOO!, I’ll gladly wear a napkin on my head in exchange for a good man.

  • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • Why do WHITE men always think they are in charge

    • The issue at hand is not race, it is order. Biblical headship is not based on skin color but on God’s design for authority, responsibility, and family structure. In Scripture, it is the man, not the white man, black man, or any other classification—who is called to lead, protect, and provide.

      Injecting racial resentment into a discussion about Biblical roles only distracts from the real question: Will we submit to God’s ordained structure, or will we rebel against it?

      —Lord Redbeard

  • As a Biblical woman who wears a headcovering, I really appreciate this post

  • this is what oppression look’s like

    • No, this is what obedience looks like. The world calls God’s order “oppression” because it despises authority and holiness. But submission to God’s design brings blessing, not bondage.

      True oppression is found in the chaos, confusion, and rebellion that plague the modern world. The peace and purpose found in Biblical order is not slavery—it is sacred strength.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • Well presented and truly helpful, thank you.

  • Um, Err………What?

  • You are truly a blessing to the world. Let your voice be carried WIDE!!!!!!!

  • Redbeard makes the earth-shattering claim that women should wear head coverings… not because it’s breezy, not because it’s chic, but because HE announces it to the world

    • The claim that women should wear head coverings is not mine—it is Scripture’s. 1 Corinthians 11 lays out this command plainly, not as a fashion tip, but as a symbol of authority, headship, and obedience to God’s created order.

      I do not speak on my own authority, but seek to echo what the Word of God has already declared. If that shakes the modern world, then so be it. Truth often does.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • I can only describe as a 3,000-word attempt to turn a linen napkin into a theological handcuff

  • According to Redbeardian theology, loose curls are not just a fashion statement. they are siren songs of rebellion.

    • It’s not about curls, it’s about context. In worship, Scripture calls for women to cover their heads as a sign of authority and submission (1 Corinthians 11). When that symbol is intentionally cast aside, it reflects not style, but stance.

      Beauty is not rebellion, but when appearance is used to reject God’s order, it becomes a statement of defiance. The issue isn’t fashion, it’s fidelity.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • Apparently, a woman’s head is a glory bomb that must be veiled lest it detonate in spiritual chaos

  • Ladies, pour yourself a fair trade oat milk latte, clutch your copy of The Second Sex, and prepare to faint from righteous indignation, because Redbeard is here to drag us back to 12 A.D. in sandals and submission.

  • The post paints a utopia where men are kings, women are their glorified accessories, and children are raised in God-fearing uniformity under the majestic scent of patriarchal beard oil.

    • When truth strikes a nerve, insults often follow. But name-calling is not an argument, it’s a surrender of reason.

      If you wish to have a serious discussion, I welcome it. If not, your words speak for themselves.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • Forget leaning in—ladies, kneel down. Ideally, while baking bread and veiling your sinful bangs.

    • Mockery doesn’t overturn truth. The call for women to walk in meekness, modesty, and submission isn’t demeaning; it’s dignifying. It reflects the beauty of Christ’s Church and honors the roles God has wisely assigned.

      Kneeling in reverence is far more powerful than grasping for worldly status. And yes—baking bread and wearing a veil can be holy acts when done in obedience to God.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • It’s all very moving—especially if you’re moved by the idea of going back to an era when female literacy was suspicious and ankle visibility was grounds for a stoning.

    • What moves us is not a return to superstition or abuse, but a return to order, honor, and holiness. Biblical patriarchy never feared female literacy—many godly women have been powerful teachers, writers, and mothers of nations. What it did expect was modesty, humility, and reverence for God’s law.

      This isn’t about going back—it’s about building forward on eternal foundations that modern rebellion has tried to erase. The Great Order calls us to rise, not regress.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • Head Coverings Are Holy: The article insists that women must veil themselves to honor God, angels, men, and the mailman

  • Apparently, your bare head is a theological hazard unless swaddled in cotton.

  • Well Paul Said It, That Settles It. The argument leans heavily on the Apostle Paul’s writings “interpreted”, of course

  • This absolute SHIT is written through the lens of what I can only describe as “Beard-Based Hermeneutics.” Paul wasn’t just an apostle—he’s the author’s personal stylist.

  • Glory Must Be Hidden: Did you know your hair is your glory? That means it must be tucked away like contraband.

  • Key Takeaways from This Lace-Draped Horror:NONE. Please don’t waste your time reading this

  • This insane narcissist DEMANDS!!!! Cover up! Because when the patriarchy sees too much glory, they might forget their place—at the pulpit, the head of the table, and in control of everything. (Vomit)

    • Name-calling doesn’t change truth. Head coverings are not about male insecurity—they are about God’s command and His created order. 1 Corinthians 11 teaches that a woman’s glory is her hair, and covering it during worship honors the authority structure God has ordained.

      The real issue is not control—it’s reverence. In a rebellious age, submission to God’s design may look like madness to the world, but to the faithful, it is wisdom and worship.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • Veiling Is Voluntary (But Not Really): Like any good spiritual manipulation, the article presents head coverings as a “beautiful choice”… that you’ll regret not making when the wrath of heaven meets your uncovered crown.

  • ⭐ 1 out of 5 stars (but 5 out of 5 on the Oppression-O-Meter)

  • This is the literary equivalent of telling women, “You’re a princess… now go hide behind that curtain.” 

  • If your dream is to cosplay as an obedient nun while baking sourdough and bearing your 11th child, this article is for you.

    • If honoring God’s design for womanhood looks like “cosplay” to the modern mind, that says more about the world than it does about the Word.

      Raising children, keeping the home, and walking in obedience are not costumes, they’re callings. And for many faithful women, they are a crown of glory, not a burden.

      —Lord Redbeard

  • Veiled Glory is a tapestry of sanctified sexism—woven with proof-texts, pastoral sighs, and a healthy dose of “submit quietly.”

  • Because nothing screams “spiritual empowerment” like being told your hair is too glorious and must be covered before it incites male lust or divine disappointment.

  • “Veiled Glory” or “How to Oppress Yourself with Fabric: A Patriarch’s Guide to Head Accessories

  • Authored (of course) by a man—presumably while wearing a tunic, sandals, and the smirk of 1 Corinthians 11 tattooed on his chest—this article makes a passionate case for why women should dress their heads like they’re constantly in a Renaissance fair prayer circle

  • Reading Veiled Glory made me want to rip off my hat, shave my head, and enroll in a gender studies PhD program just to balance the scales of the universe. But instead, I lit a feminist candle (lavender-scented, intersectionally sourced) and kept reading—because like every car crash of Christian fundamentalism, you just can’t look away.

  • ⭐ 0 out of 5 stars (but 10 out of 10 for turning a doily into a doctrine)

  • Angels Are Watching: Yes, the article warns that angels are monitoring our hairstyles. Can you imagine Gabriel taking notes? “Subject 005A has a visible ponytail. Dispatch judgment.”

  • Just when I thought we had escaped the dark ages of gender roles, I stumbled upon Veiled Glory: The Case for Christian Women Wearing Head Coverings, a theological fashion guide for turning your scalp into a symbol of surrender. Spoiler alert: it’s not about sun protection.

  • i’m confused. first you hate all the ragheads and muslims then you want your wife to wear a headdress?

Leave a Reply to Vousha Teal Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *