All posts by Lord Redbeard

Health, Religion, Social Topics

The Keeper of the Table: A Wife’s Duty in Nourishment, Frugality, and Dominion Over the Household Food Economy

6 Comments

The table is not just a place of eating. It is a place of worship, formation, and covenantal joy. The aroma of daily bread, the sight of a garden harvest, and the discipline of wholesome meals are not secondary to Christian living, they are vital expressions of order, stewardship, and feminine strength.

In a godly household, the wife is the keeper of the table. She governs not only the aesthetics of hospitality but the substance of nourishment. Her duties in food, nutrition, and frugality are not mundane tasks, they are holy responsibilities entrusted to her by God to bless her husband, raise strong children, and honor the covenantal home.

I. Food Preparation as a Sacred Ministry

From the earliest pages of Scripture, food preparation has been a domain of feminine care and virtue. Abraham’s wife, Sarah, “quickly kneaded three seahs of fine flour” to serve their angelic guests (Genesis 18:6). The Proverbs 31 woman “brings her food from afar” (Proverbs 31:14) and “rises while it is yet night to provide food for her household” (v.15). She is not idle, and her hands are diligent in feeding those under her care.

Food preparation is not a secular task. It is a form of love. When a wife prepares nourishing meals, she is doing more than satisfying hunger, she is building the bones and minds of future generations. She is creating an atmosphere of peace and stability. She is turning raw ingredients into sustenance for warriors and worshippers.

“She looks well to the ways of her household and does not eat the bread of idleness.” – Proverbs 31:27

This ministry of nourishment is daily. It is repetitive. It is sacrificial. But it is glorious. A wife who governs the kitchen with wisdom and joy brings strength to her home, honor to her husband, and delight to her Creator.

II. Whole Food for Whole Families: Rejecting Industrial Poison

In modern times, food has been hijacked by industry and perverted by convenience. Processed sugars, chemical preservatives, seed oils, and hyper-palatable junk have replaced the God-given simplicity of grains, vegetables, legumes, and fresh produce. This shift has not only sickened bodies but has weakened wills, dulled minds, and sapped the energy of Christian homes.

A godly wife must resist this tide. She must take dominion over the kitchen, not by outsourcing it to fast food or microwaves, but by returning to whole food principles that nourish rather than harm.

  • Replace sugar with honey and fruit.
  • Replace refined flour with whole grains.
  • Eliminate junk snacks, sodas, and boxed meals.
  • Cook from scratch with rice, beans, seasonal produce, and clean meats.

The goal is not gourmet extravagance, it is wholesome simplicity. Meals built from God’s earth. Meals that are filling, healing, and strengthening.

“Whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.” – 1 Corinthians 10:31

The body is a temple (1 Corinthians 6:19). Feeding that temple with poison is an act of defilement. A godly wife understands this. She treats food not as a comfort drug or a hobby, but as a sacred trust.

III. Frugality and Creativity: Dominion Without Debt

The wise woman is not only a good cook, but she is also a skilled economist. She manages the food budget with shrewdness and foresight. She does not chase trends or waste money on convenience. She learns the art of frugality, not out of poverty, but out of purpose.

“She perceives that her merchandise is profitable.” – Proverbs 31:18

In a time of inflation and supply chain instability, the wife who knows how to stretch meals, avoid waste, and creatively repurpose leftovers is a treasure. She buys in bulk. She plans meals in advance. She stores surplus. She prepares for lean seasons.

This frugality is not scarcity; it is abundance through wisdom. The family that eats rice and lentils for lunch, fresh bread for dinner, and garden vegetables for supper is eating better than the household living on frozen pizza and debt.

Such a wife becomes the financial gatekeeper of the home, ensuring that dominion is built not only through income, but through intelligent consumption.

IV. Supplementing with Gardening: Cultivating Eden at Home

In an era where even food is politically weaponized and biologically manipulated, many families are returning to gardening, not as a hobby, but as a necessity. A wife with a garden is a wife who brings Eden into her backyard. She becomes a producer, not just a consumer.

  • Lettuce, kale, and spinach for fresh greens.
  • Tomatoes, zucchini, and beans for seasonal staples.
  • Herbs like basil, oregano, and rosemary for flavor and health.
  • Potatoes, carrots, and onions for long-term use.

Gardening builds resilience. It teaches children responsibility. It reduces dependency on globalist systems and empowers the home to feed itself.

The Proverbs 31 woman “considers a field and buys it; with the fruit of her hands she plants a vineyard” (v.16). Likewise, the modern Christian wife should reclaim gardening as an act of dominion. Whether in pots on an apartment balcony or rows in a country yard, let her plant, harvest, and glorify God.

V. Preserving and Storing: Wisdom for Times to Come

In addition to daily meals, the virtuous woman thinks seasonally and strategically. She does not wait for winter to prepare. She preserves food. She stores dry goods. She builds a pantry as a bulwark against uncertainty.

“The wise store up choice food and olive oil, but fools gulp theirs down.” – Proverbs 21:20 (NIV)

This includes:

  • Canning fruits, vegetables, and sauces.
  • Dehydrating herbs and meats.
  • Freezing harvests and broths.
  • Stockpiling rice, beans, flour, and salt.

This is not fear, it is foresight. Noah built the ark before it rained. Joseph stored grain before the famine. Likewise, the godly wife builds a food reserve, not to hoard, but to provide, even in times of trouble.

A home with shelves of home-canned peaches, dried herbs, buckets of oats, and fresh bread is a home that testifies to wisdom and love.

VI. Bread from Her Hands: The Daily Offering

Among the most ancient and powerful acts of feminine provision is the baking of bread. The Proverbs 31 woman “brings her food from afar,” and “her hands hold the spindle.” She is industrious in nourishing her household.

Daily bread is not merely food, it is a symbol of divine provision. Christ taught us to pray, “Give us this day our daily bread” (Matthew 6:11), because bread represents the essentials of life, humble, sustaining, fresh.

When a wife bakes bread daily, she embodies this principle. The home is filled with aroma and warmth. Children grow up with the memory of kneading dough beside their mother. Husbands are strengthened by their wife’s labor.

Simple loaves made from flour, salt, water, and yeast become sacraments of love. They are cheaper than store bread, healthier, and laden with meaning.

VII. Lessons from Early America: Strength Through Simplicity

Modern families could learn much from the agrarian households of early America. In the 1700s and early 1800s, meat was a rare luxury, not a daily staple. Sugar was scarce, used sparingly if at all. Meals consisted of:

  • Porridge and cornmeal mush
  • Root vegetables like turnips and potatoes
  • Beans, lentils, and seasonal greens
  • Bread made at home
  • Apples, preserved fruits, or wild berries

Despite the simplicity, these families were stronger, physically and mentally. Obesity was rare. Disease was less rampant. Children were hardy. And meals were sacred events, not hurried inconveniences.

Modern science confirms this. Diets high in sugar and processed food are linked to inflammation, heart disease, obesity, and depression. Returning to simple, whole foods is not nostalgic, it is righteous stewardship.

A wife who learns from the past is not regressive, she is wise. She sees that the way forward may mean reaching backward to principles that sustained generations before us.

Conclusion: The Hand that Feeds Rules the Home

The wife is not just a cook; she is a nourisher of nations. Through her hands, children grow strong, husbands are blessed, and guests are welcomed. Through her wisdom, the budget is guarded, the pantry is filled, and health is preserved.

She does not need a professional degree to rule the kitchen, only fear of the Lord, joy in her calling, and skill in her hands. She sees food not as a chore, but as a ministry. She understands that feeding the family is a matter of worship, not mere routine.

In this age of dietary chaos and culinary idolatry, let the Christian wife rise and take dominion over the kitchen. Let her plant, cook, preserve, and prepare, not just meals, but warriors, worshipers, and wise women.

Let her say with joy each evening, as her husband blesses the food, her children gather around the table, and the bread is broken:

“This is the portion the Lord has given me to tend, and I will do it with strength and love.”

Polygamy, Religion

When a Woman Marries a Biblical Husband, She Leaves All and Becomes One Flesh

2 Comments

In a world that prizes independence, self-expression, and perpetual connection to family and friends, the Biblical vision for marriage stands in stark, unwavering contrast. When a woman marries a man under God’s order, she is not simply signing a social contract or celebrating a romantic milestone—she is undergoing a covenantal death and resurrection. She dies to her former life and rises to walk in oneness with her husband. There is no looking back. No lingering ties. No dual loyalties. No competing authorities. She becomes his, and he becomes hers, under God.

1. The Covenant of Leaving and Cleaving

The foundation of Biblical marriage is established in Genesis 2:24:

“Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”

This passage is often quoted, but rarely understood in its full weight. While the verse addresses the man, the principle of leaving and cleaving applies equally to the woman. The man leaves his parents to initiate a new household. The woman, by marrying him, enters that household and leaves her own behind.

Marriage is not an arrangement of two individuals pursuing parallel dreams. It is the fusion of two lives into one household under one headship, not her father’s anymore, not her mother’s, not her pastor’s—but her husband’s.

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.” – Ephesians 5:22

Her loyalty is now exclusively to her husband. She has no spiritual, emotional, or relational ties that can override or compete with her submission to him.

2. A Severance Without Regret

The Biblical wife does not maintain dual allegiances. She is not torn between her husband’s leadership and her parents’ opinions. She is not divided between her husband’s vision and her girlfriends’ expectations. She is not emotionally tethered to a past life through social media, group chats, or nostalgia. She has cut the cord with the world—and she does not look back.

“Remember Lot’s wife.” – Luke 17:32

Lot’s wife serves as a haunting warning. Though delivered from destruction, she looked back with longing to the world she was leaving—and was judged for it. In marriage, looking back at the old life is not harmless sentiment. It is rebellion in the heart. A wife who glances backward—toward old authority, old affections, or old habits—risks despising the new covenant she has entered.

3. Leaving Family: The Final Transfer of Headship

“Hearken, O daughter, and consider, and incline thine ear; forget also thine own people, and thy father’s house; So shall the king greatly desire thy beauty: for he is thy Lord; and worship thou him.” – Psalm 45:10–11

This prophetic wedding Psalm pictures the bride leaving behind her father’s house to belong entirely to her lord—her husband. She is told to forget her people, to incline her ear to her new lord, and to offer him the loyalty of heart, body, and soul.

Modern women are raised to be emotionally attached to their parents, particularly their mothers, well into adulthood. But marriage is a transfer of authority and allegiance. A married woman who still runs to her parents for advice, sympathy, or protection is out of order. Her father is no longer her covering. Her mother is no longer her counselor. Her husband is now both leader and protector under God.

4. Leaving Friends and the World Behind

“Be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind…” – Romans 12:2

Friendships from a woman’s past life—particularly with ungodly, unmarried, or feminist women—must be left behind Immediately and without exception. These relationships will become channels of rebellion, sowing doubt and dissatisfaction into the marriage. A wife united to her husband must guard the gates of influence and protect her affections.

“Evil communications corrupt good manners.” – 1 Corinthians 15:33

She does not “go out with the girls,” entertain worldly counsel, or seek emotional support outside the household. Her affections, concerns, and loyalties are reserved for her husband, her children, and her God. That is her new world.

5. One Flesh—One Life

“So then they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.” – Mark 10:8-9

Becoming “one flesh” is not poetic—it is ontological. A new organism is created in the covenant of marriage: the household. The woman is no longer her own. Her thoughts, her time, her body, her purpose—all belong to her husband. She has become him in covenantal unity, under his rule and protection.

“The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband…” – 1 Corinthians 7:4

This is not slavery—it is sacred union. The feminist world cannot comprehend it. But in God’s design, the wife’s surrender is not dehumanization—it is glorification. She becomes a living picture of the Church, submitting to Christ.

“As the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.” – Ephesians 5:24

6. No Looking Back—Only Forward Together

Once married, a wife does not second-guess her obedience. She does not weigh her husband’s leadership against the opinions of others. She does not maintain back doors, backup plans or “escape” routes . Her heart is steady, her soul is aligned, and her eyes are fixed on the household’s future.

The moment a woman clings to the past, the marriage begins to fracture. But when she embraces her calling fully, cuts every tie that competes with her husband, and commits herself to building his name, the house becomes a fortress of peace and power.

“Her husband doth safely trust in her… She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life.” – Proverbs 31:11-12

This is not popular. It is not easy. But it is the path of blessing.

7. Conclusion: A Holy Severing and a Holy Union

A woman who marries a Biblical husband does not merely add a role to her life—she is transplanted. She leaves her father’s house, her friendships, her comforts, her former authorities, and becomes one flesh with her husband, under Christ. This is not bondage—it is Biblical. It is not outdated—it is divine order.

She says, like Ruth:

“Whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God.” – Ruth 1:16

No looking back. No divided heart. She is his. And in this sacred surrender, she finds her highest glory.

Polygamy, Religion

A Wife’s Role in Finding Her Husband Another Wife: A Biblical Case for Shared Stewardship

No comments

In a culture steeped in romantic individualism and emotional entitlement, the idea that a wife could — or should — be involved in finding another wife for her husband seems radical, even offensive. But when we return to the Bible, we discover a vision for family that is ordered, sacrificial, and aimed not at feelings and emotion but, fruitfulness and kingdom purpose.

This post will lay out a Biblical foundation for why a wife may not only support but even initiate the pursuit of another wife for her husband — not as a betrayal of her role, but as a fulfillment of it.

1. Polygyny in the Biblical Record: Not Condemned, but Regulated

The first step is acknowledging that polygyny (one man, multiple wives) is never condemned in Scripture regardless what you may have heard to the contrary. Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon, and many others had multiple wives. While some situations led to strife, the Lord never outlawed the practice; instead, He gave laws to regulate it (see Exodus 21:10, Deuteronomy 21:15–17).

God is not the author of confusion (1 Cor. 14:33), and the presence of such relationships in His Word — including in the lineage of Christ cannot be dismissed simply because they are not currently “in style”. The Church has long tried to sweep this under the rug, but the Bible does not share that discomfort.

2. The Wife’s Role as a Helper and Keeper of the Household

Genesis 2:18 tells us the wife was created to be a helper fit for her husband. This is not a small task, it’s a sacred one. A godly wife is a builder of her household (Proverbs 14:1), and that includes discerning what her family needs to grow and thrive.

If a man is walking in righteousness, leading with strength, and bearing fruit in his work and leadership, the question becomes: Why wouldn’t a wise and godly wife desire to multiply that influence?

A woman who fears the Lord sees the bigger picture. She knows her husband’s strength is not just for her benefit, but for God’s glory.

3. An Example in Sarah: A Wife Who Gave Another Woman to Her Husband

Genesis 16 gives us a striking example: Sarai gave her maid Hagar to Abram to bear a child. While the result was complicated, it was Sarah’s idea. She saw her barrenness and sought to provide her husband with a son, and she was not condemned for this action.

Her motives were not perfect, but her initiative aligned with a foundational truth: a godly woman desires her husband’s name and legacy to continue. This isn’t weakness, it’s vision.

4. The Spirit of Selflessness in Biblical Marriage

Biblical love is not based on insecurity, jealousy, or possessiveness. First Corinthians 13 teaches us that love “does not envy,” “is not self-seeking,” and “rejoices in the truth.” A godly wife, confident in her place, understands that adding another woman is not a threat, it’s an act of expansion.

Just as Christ’s Bride (the Church) is not made of one person, but many, so too can a man’s household expand, ideally with the current wife/wives blessing and even involvement.

5. Unity and Order: A Wife as Gatekeeper, Not Gate Crasher

If a man simply adds a second wife without unity in his home, chaos can result. But when a first wife leads or participates in that process — helping to vet, disciple, and welcome a new wife into the family, there can be a greater chance of order, peace, and shared vision.

Rather than being left out, the first wife is honored with responsibility. She becomes not only a wife, but a matriarch, a Titus 2 woman who models maturity and sacrifice.

6. The Gospel Model: Multiplication Through Submission

The Gospel is a model of submission for the sake of fruit. Christ submitted to the Father. The Church submits to Christ. Husbands lay down their lives. Wives submit to their husbands, not because they are lesser, but because their obedience multiplies life.

In the same way, a wife’s willingness to open her home and heart to another woman, chosen with wisdom and prayer, can be a powerful testimony of Gospel love: not possessive, but sacrificial and abundant.

Conclusion: A Higher Vision for Marriage

This isn’t about competition or romantic indulgence. It’s about seeing marriage as mission, family as fruitfulness, and love as selfless.

A wife who encourages or even leads in seeking another godly woman for her husband isn’t abdicating her role, she is elevating it. She is thinking generationally. She is multiplying strength. She is trusting that God’s ways are higher than ours.

And in a world of broken homes and weak men, we need more women who are brave enough to build something bigger than themselves.

“A wise woman builds her house…” — Proverbs 14:1
“He who finds a wife finds a good thing and obtains favor from the Lord.” — Proverbs 18:22

Let us be women — and men — who pursue the favor of the Lord above the approval of man.

Religion, Social Topics, Uncategorized

The Garments of Rebellion: Why Women Must Not Wear Pants

28 Comments

Clothing is theology in textile. It proclaims order or defies it. It reflects reverence or rebellion. And in the long war against Biblical patriarchy, there is perhaps no more symbolic battlefield than the modern woman’s closet.

In this age of inversion (where men are weak and women are loud) our generation has forgotten even the most basic distinctions of God’s created order. One of the clearest? That a woman must not wear that which pertains to a man.

“The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.”  —Deuteronomy 22:5

This is not a suggestion, it is not cultural, and iIt is not optional. This is a commandment from the mouth of Almighty God. And it still applies today.

The issue of women wearing pants is about headship, holiness, and health. About whether we will serve the Lord or follow the patterns of the pagan world. And the cost of ignoring it has been devastating, morally, spiritually, medically, and socially.

Let us walk through the evidence (Scriptural, historical, medical, and social) and let every woman who fears the Lord return to modesty, and every man who loves his household restore order at the gate.

I. Scriptural Foundation: God Commands Distinction

The Biblical worldview is built on order and separation. God separates light from darkness (Genesis 1:4). He separates the waters from the firmament (Genesis 1:6). He separates the clean from the unclean (Leviticus 10:10). He separates Israel from the nations (Leviticus 20:24).  And He separates male from female, in role, responsibility, and appearance.

Deuteronomy 22:5 does not mince words: for a woman to wear what pertains to a man is abomination. Not simply disobedience but abomination. The Hebrew word used is to‘ebah, the same word used for witchcraft, homosexuality, and idolatry. This means that cross-dressing is not just inappropriate, it is profane.

Nowhere in Scripture are pants specifically prohibited. That is not the argument. The argument is this: pants were historically male attire, and women began wearing them not from righteousness, but from rebellion. Thus, when women began donning trousers, it was not to honor God, but to cast off His design.

II. Historical Dress: The Distinction Was Clear

For over 9,900 years of human history, men and women dressed differently. Always.

  • In ancient Israel, men wore tunics girded with belts for mobility, and women wore long, flowing robes distinct in cut and modesty.
  • In Greco-Roman cultures, men wore shorter tunics for labor and travel, while women wore longer stolas and peplos, modest and covering.
  • In Medieval Christendom, men wore hose and breeches, women wore long gowns.
  • In Victorian and Reformation-era Europe, a woman in trousers would have been regarded as mentally ill, immoral, or both.

Even in the early American colonies, modesty and gender distinction were unquestioned. The Puritans, the Baptists, and the early settlers knew that attire was theological. A woman in pants would be rebuked or excommunicated.

The Rise of Pants on Women: A History of Rebellion

It wasn’t until the mid-1800s that women first publicly began wearing trousers, through the influence of feminists and radicals.

  • Amelia Bloomer, a feminist activist, promoted the “bloomer costume” (pants for women) explicitly to break gender norms.
  • The suffragette movement and first-wave feminists used male clothing as a symbolic protest against male authority.
  • By the 1940s, during World War II, women wore trousers in factories out of necessity, but many kept them post-war.
  • By the 1960s, with the sexual revolution, women’s pants became a symbol of liberation from patriarchy, modesty, and Christian morality.

Make no mistake: the acceptance of women wearing pants was part of a broader rebellion against Biblical womanhood. It paralleled the rise of abortion, birth control, sexual promiscuity, divorce, and feminism.

III. Christian Testimony: The Church Once Stood Firm

Until the late 20th century, all Christian denominations opposed women in pants. The Methodists, in early America, taught that women wearing “men’s garments” brought shame upon the church. Southern Baptists in the 1950s preached that modesty and femininity excluded pants for women. Pentecostals and Holiness movements retained skirts-only standards well into the 1990s, citing Deuteronomy 22:5 and modesty concerns.

Why did they care? Because clothing is a signal of submission to God’s order. When a woman dressed like a man, she was usurping his role.

The decay of modest dress paralleled the decay of the Christian household. When women dressed like men, they soon began to live like men, leaving the home, rejecting headship, avoiding motherhood, and abandoning submission.

IV. Modesty and Covering: The Role of Garments in Holiness

In Genesis 3:21, after the fall, God made garments of skins to clothe Adam and Eve. The Hebrew word kĕthoneth refers to a tunic covering the shoulders to the knees at minimum.

This was a spiritual response to sin. Throughout Scripture, garments are used to signal: Holiness vs. uncleanness (Leviticus 13:47), Office and authority (Exodus 28:2, priestly garments), Shame or honor (Isaiah 47:2-3).

Pants (by their form-fitting structure) expose, rather than conceal, especially on the female form. They draw attention to the thighs, hips, and private areas, exactly what Biblical modesty seeks to conceal, not emphasize.

Isaiah 47:2–3 rebukes Babylon: “Take the millstones, and grind meal: uncover thy locks, make bare the leg, uncover the thigh… Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen.” God equates uncovering the thigh with shame. Pants, by their design, outline the thigh. This is provocation, even when paired with long tops, the core issue remains: pants are not feminine nor modest.

V. Health Concerns: Medical Risks of Pants for Women

Beyond the Scriptural and symbolic concerns, modern medical research shows that pants (especially tight ones) are harmful to female health.

1. Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) and UTIs

Tight pants restrict airflow and trap moisture, creating a warm, dark, damp environment ideal for bacterial overgrowth. Studies have shown a correlation between wearing pants and 300%-600% increased risk of bacterial vaginosis, yeast infections, and urinary tract infections (UTIs).  According to the Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, women who wore tight jeans or pants for over 4 hours daily had significantly higher rates of BV and UTIs.

2. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and Hormonal Disruption

While PCOS is primarily a hormonal condition, tight clothing (especially around the waist and hips) will exacerbate symptoms by: Disrupting circulation to reproductive organs, Increasing cortisol and insulin sensitivity, And restricting lymphatic drainage

The British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology noted that waist-restrictive clothing increased ovarian stress by 300% in women with pre-existing endocrine disorders.

3. Infertility and Miscarriage Risk

Chronic pressure around the pelvic area has been linked to: Reduced blood flow to the uterus, thermal damage to reproductive organs, and Increased miscarriage risk, especially in early gestation.

Dr. Niels Lauersen, author of “It’s Your Body”, reported that women wearing tight pants and synthetic undergarments experienced higher rates of infertility and irregular cycles.

4. Skin and Nerve Damage

Tight pants can cause “meralgia paresthetica,” a nerve compression condition that leads to numbness, tingling, and burning in the thighs. They also increase the likelihood of folliculitis, ingrown hairs, and skin fungal infections, especially in hot or humid climates. In short: pants were never designed for the female body. They compress, restrict, and expose, exactly the opposite of God’s design for a woman’s covering.

VI. Psychological and Social Impact: Clothing Shapes Identity

Psychologists refer to “enclothed cognition”, the idea that clothing not only expresses but shapes how we think, feel, and behave. When a woman wears pants: She often feels more aggressive and assertive, she adopts a masculine posture and stride, she is more likely to challenge male authority, and she is treated differently – less like a nurturer, more like a peer or competitor

This is by design. Feminists embraced pants because they understood that clothing alters self-perception. The woman in a dress moves more gently, behaves more modestly, and signals submission, whether she realizes it or not. When we clothe our daughters in pants, we teach them that gender is flexible, submission is optional, and order is negotiable. We sabotage their future before they even understand their calling.

VII. The Way Forward: Return to Distinct, Modest, Feminine Dress

I am not simply calling women to wear skirts. I am calling them to embrace: God’s created order, to visible submission to headship, to reverence in attire, and to health and holiness. A Biblical woman’s clothing should: Cover her from shoulder to the ankle, avoid tight, sheer, or  form-exposing material, distinguish her clearly from male attire, and proclaim modesty, meekness, and dignity.

“In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety…” —1 Timothy 2:9

Godly women are not ashamed of modesty. They rejoice in it. They know that their beauty is not in the outline of their thighs, but in the hidden man of the heart (1 Peter 3:4).

VIII. Fathers and Husbands: You Will Give Account

Men, this begins with you. Your wife and daughters are not fashion experiments. They are your household, your responsibility, your glory.

You will stand before God for how they dress. You are to teach, protect, and lead. If your wife is wearing leggings in public, your failure is visible to the world. If your daughter is wearing tight jeans, you are permitting disorder. It is time to take back authority. To speak plainly. To restore the ancient standards.

Let your house reflect heaven, not Hollywood.

IX. Common Objections Answered

“But pants are modest if they’re loose!”
Not if they pertain to a man. Deuteronomy 22:5 does not say “immodest clothing”, it says man’s clothing. Even loose pants confuse the gender distinction.

“It’s a cultural thing.”
No. It is a creation thing. The command in Deuteronomy is rooted in God’s design of male and female. Culture cannot override creation.

“God looks at the heart.”
Yes, and the heart that loves God obeys His commands, including in outward dress.

“But I feel more comfortable in pants!”
So did the feminists. So do rebels. Comfort is not the standard, obedience is.

X. Let the Daughters Be Clothed in Glory

I do not call women to wear skirts because of nostalgia. I call them because Scripture commands distinction, history affirms modesty, and health demands covering. The rebellion of pants must end. Let the daughters of Zion be known by: Their humility, their holiness, their honor, and their visible submission to God’s order

Let the wives of Christian men walk in dignity, not in defiance. Let the households of the righteous proclaim by their clothing: We will serve the Lord. And let the world see that in a sea of confusion and compromise, there remains a remnant, unashamed, unbending, and unafraid.

Let the skirts flow. Let the thighs be covered. Let the husbands lead. Let the daughters rejoice.  Let modesty return.


Let the Great Order rise again!

Soli Deo Gloria.

Politics, Religion, Social Topics

Is God a Globalist or a Nationalist?

9 Comments

Is God a Globalist or a Nationalist? I’m sure most modern Churches and Christians would contend that he is a Globalist, that he does not see race/creed/nation/culture etc. If so then why did he create these defining characteristics?

If you have children, family or even close relatives that live with you, it’s fair to assume you love them more than you love relatives other non-related families.

That doesn’t mean you hate other families, does it? You can have “empathy, compassion, and understanding” for your friends, neighbors and even total strangers without having them live in your house.

That’s because it’s your house. You may let people come in from time to time, as guests, or maybe even for an extended stay if they are suffering in some way, you may even allow them to join your family on a long term basis provided certain terms are set and boundaries established. But it is still your house, not theirs.

It’s the same with nations. Nations are people, not governments, just as a family is the people of the household, not the household rules. A Nation is your “Extended” family.  The word Nation is literally in reference to the nationality of it’s people.

A nation like America can have “empathy, compassion, and understanding” for other nations, particularly if those nations are suffering in some way, but the “house” still belongs to the Americans. “Nationalism” requires no hatred for other nations. It just clarifies who owns the house. The Indians own India, the Japanese own Japan, the Africans own Africa and the Americans own America.

But God is certainly no globalist. Surely He loves all the people of the globe, for He created them all. He loves the genuine diversity that exists in the variety of cultures, languages, and skin colors that He created to be different on purpose. But in terms of how those many diverse nations relate to each other, God is in fact a nationalist.

That does not mean we can sign God up for our political parties or pet projects. Far from it. It merely means from beginning to end, His Word speaks of the nations as nations, calls them to serve Him as nations, sets their borders, provides for the protection of those borders, and for the ultimate healing of those nations.

He clearly acts to disrupt globalist projects like the Tower of Babel, where the nations tried to live together in a globalist/multicultural empire. Against this globalist attempt, God scattered them into distinct nations with their own distinct cultures and languages.

Do we think ourselves wiser than God? He says explicitly in the Bible that He created diversity out of unity (the nations from the blood of one man), and that He sets the boundaries or borders where they are to live. Why? So that they will be better able to seek after Him and find Him:

“God…has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their pre-appointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings, so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us….” (Acts 17:26–27)

Globalism/multiculturalism is clearly not God’s plan, insisting that all these different people live together in the same house (nation), thus destroying the beauty of all their individual nations, cultures and amazing diversity. The result is the opposite of what God said would happen when we respect national borders: the nations find it much harder to seek and find God.

So this begs the question, what nationality is America? we are ethnically, linguistically, historically, culturally, and religiously European. For the purposes of this writing Jesus was from Israel, to be sure, which is not in Europe. He is not a European (nor is He African). He is what most would call Middle Eastern. He is an Israelite, a son of David and Abraham. We are also a Christian Nation. the New Testament has a surprisingly European foundation. It’s written, not in Hebrew, but in a European language (Greek). The Son of God appeared in the midst of a European empire, and the Gospel was carried on European roads and in European ships. Paul was redirected from further eastward missionary activity by a vision of a European man. And the one man who wrote more of the New Testament than any other was Luke, a European.


These facts give us no cause to boast, but rather to be humble and thankful. Historically, so far, “the faith is Europe, and Europe is the faith,” as Hilaire Belloc put it. We should harbor no animosity toward people who look, live, or speak differently than us. We should pray for peace among all the nations, and for the love and truth of Christ to bring healing to every people on the face of the earth. We should treasure the unique cultures of every people and want them to be protected and preserved as God created them.

But again, our primary focus should be our own people and our own nation, as that is our duty to our families, children, neighbors and to God.

Therefore, Globalism/Multiculturalism, among other things, hinders the work of the Great Commission and proves that God is in fact a Nationalist!

Finance, Future, Politics

Gold, Silver, and the Great Repricing

No comments

A sober look at the coming repricing of truth in a world awash in paper promises.

1. The Storm and the Shelter

The world entered 2020 expecting growth and stability. Instead, it received paralysis. Economies locked down, supply chains froze, and entire industries vanished within weeks. Markets convulsed in panic as governments scrambled to invent new money faster than businesses could close their doors.

Investors reached for what they always reach for in crisis, certainty. Not profit, but preservation. By August, gold had surged past $2,000 per ounce for the first time in history, and silver briefly touched $29. Futures traders and retail buyers alike rushed into metals as the dollar index slid below 94 and real yields went negative.

Gold and silver were not merely commodities this summer; they were confessions. Every ounce purchased was a quiet admission that the system built on paper promises was no longer trusted.

The world is searching for shelter, and the ancient refuge of honest weight was the only one left standing.

2. The Mechanics Behind the Spike

What drove this explosion is not mystery but mathematics. Between March and September 2020, the U.S. Federal Reserve expanded its balance sheet from roughly $4 trillion to over $7 trillion – an increase greater than the entire balance sheet after the 2008 crisis. Zero interest rate policy returned overnight, and “quantitative easing” became “QE Infinity.”

Congress has followed suit, approving more than $3 trillion in fiscal stimulus through the CARES Act and related programs. Trillions more were promised globally. Fiat supply is expanding faster than productivity, while real-world goods are trapped in ports or shuttered factories.

In simple terms, there are more dollars chasing fewer things. And in the financial psyche, that equation always ends with gold.

The metals market has also felt an unprecedented squeeze in physical supply. Refiners not producing due to lockdowns, coin mints run skeleton crews, and logistics systems are not moving. Dealers worldwide report premiums doubling or tripling even as spot prices fluctuated. Silver Eagles that normally sell for $2 over spot are commanding $6 to $10 premiums. Paper contracts promised metal that refiners couldn’t deliver.

The price spike is not simply speculative enthusiasm; it is logistical desperation layered on top of monetary panic.

3. The Federal Reserve’s Trap

Central banks faced a dilemma of their own making last year. They had promised endless growth funded by endless credit. COVID-19 simply exposed how fragile that illusion was.

When rates are near zero, the Fed loses its ability to stimulate traditionally. The only remaining tools are money creation and moral suasion, the power to promise safety loud enough that investors pretend to believe it. But by mid-2020, even that faith was thinning.

Every new round of quantitative easing was a confession that the last one failed. Each “rescue package” was a bandage on an artery. The Fed had become both arsonist and fireman, printing water to fight a fire made of paper.

Historically, such interventions delay collapse rather than prevent it. Inflation lags behind money printing by 12–48 months, meaning the real consequences of 2020’s stimulus will not appear until 2021–2024. Investors sensing that delay turned to metals not because they expected instant profit, but because they recognized the timeline of decay.

Gold and silver are forward-looking instruments of distrust. When policy becomes parody, people stop valuing words and return to weight.

4. The Psychology of Fear and FOMO

Markets are not run by algorithms; they are driven by fear. By mid-2020, fear had divided investors into two camps, the terrified and the opportunistic.

The terrified sold everything in March, when the Dow plunged 35% over three weeks. The opportunistic saw governments unleashing liquidity on an unimaginable scale and realized the debasement had begun. That group flooded into hard assets: farmland, crypto, metals, and even ammunition.

Silver, in particular, became the “poor man’s gold.” Retail investors unable to afford $2,000 gold bars could still buy $25 silver coins, and millions did. YouTube and Reddit became classrooms of panic-education where first-time buyers learned what a troy ounce was. This democratization of fear created a sustained bid beneath the market.

The psychology was identical to 2008-2011, when gold hit $1,920 and silver $49. Then, as now, monetary policy had cornered savers: zero interest, high risk, and no trust. But unlike 2011, the 2020 crisis affected every nation simultaneously. There was no safe currency left to flee to.

When all fiat burns together, gold ceases to be a hedge, it becomes the denominator.

5. The Biblical Parallel: Weights, Measures, and Moral Value

Economics without morality is a mathematics of theft. Scripture condemned “diverse weights and measures,” the ancient form of currency debasement. When silver coins were clipped or adulterated, markets faltered, and trust died. Our age commits the same sin electronically.

The difference is only cosmetic. Instead of melting the coin, we dilute the ledger. Each new trillion is a theft of time, a silent confiscation of the labor already stored in existing currency. Inflation is legalized counterfeiting carried out by official hands.

Gold and silver remain stubborn precisely because they cannot be printed. They stand as judgment against false promises. When the prophet Amos warned of those “who make the ephah small and the shekel great,” he was describing our modern central banking system. The manipulation of money is the oldest moral crime on earth: the deliberate exchange of illusion for effort.

Thus the flight to metals that started in 2020 is not merely financial; it is spiritual. It is the market’s confession of sin, a turning away from deceit back toward substance.

6. The Forecast: Peaks, Plateaus, and the Path Ahead

As of late 2020, gold now trades near $1,900 and silver around $24. The emotional fervor has cooled slightly from the August highs, but the fundamental conditions remain unchanged. Stimulus continues. Supply chains are fractured. Confidence is gone.

Barring a miraculous restoration of fiscal discipline (which history suggests is fantasy), the metals market will resume its climb after a brief consolidation. However, this next leg will not be explosive but measured. Volatility will persist, but structure is forming.

Gold is likely to test and stabilize around $2,000 per ounce by mid-2021, while silver reaches the $28–$30 zone. Those levels should hold for roughly 12 months or longer with perhaps some mild variations, then, a plateau rather than a collapse, as inflation metrics catch up and the world learns to price permanence again.

This pause will separate speculators from stewards. The impatient will sell when prices stagnate; the wise will understand that value is not measured in months but in integrity of measure.

7. The Second Wave: The Slow Rise Toward 2025

Markets normally move in tides, not explosions. After the first wave of panic buying in 2020, the metals market will enter a period of digestion, the eye of the storm. Prices may appear stable, but underneath, trust in paper will continue to erode. Every new fiscal rescue package, every “temporary” quantitative easing program, will quietly deepen the public’s understanding that none of this money is real.

By late 2021 and into 2022, as stimulus checks fade and the costs of living rise, the delayed effects of inflation will surface. Commodities will strengthen across the board, food, fuel, housing, while wage growth increases but fails to keep pace. When a middle-class worker realizes that the same paycheck buys less food and less security, he doesn’t need a Bloomberg terminal to understand debasement. He feels it in his grocery cart.

At that point, investors will again seek anchors. Gold will climb gradually past $2,200, then $2,500, the $3,500 and near the $4,000 mark by 2025. Silver, which always lags before over-performing, will push through $35 and flirt with $40 by 2023 and the $50.00 by 2025 The advance will not come from excitement but resignation: the recognition that the world’s debt problem cannot be solved, only inflated away.

8. The Limits of Control

Central banks will attempt to manage the narrative. They will claim inflation is “transitory,” then redefine the term when it isn’t. They will hint at rate hikes, then retreat when markets tremble. Each intervention will buy less credibility than the one before. The tools of control are losing potency because they depend on belief, and belief, like currency, can only be diluted so far.

Historically, the endgame of monetary cycles arrives not when policy fails, but when the people finally see through it. That moment is psychological, not mechanical. Once trust dies, charts are irrelevant.

By 2024–2025, gold will approach the $4,000+mark and silver the $50+ range, not because of hysteria, but because the measurement itself has changed. When the ruler stretches, everything appears larger. The metals will not have become more valuable; the currencies measuring them will have become less so. The repricing is not in ounces, but in honesty.

9. The Social Consequences of Monetary Sin

Money is not just an economic tool; it is a covenant of trust between citizens. When governments debase it, they destroy more than purchasing power, they corrode the moral fabric that binds a people together. Inflation rewards the indebted and punishes the disciplined. It celebrates consumption and mocks saving. In time, that moral inversion spreads from markets to households.

We already see its symptoms: the rise of speculation over production, of digital illusions over tangible goods. A generation trades imaginary coins while ignoring the real ones in their grandparents’ drawers. Such a culture cannot endure long because it has detached wealth from work, and price from worth.

In biblical terms, this is judgment. When a society worships paper idols, God often lets the paper burn.

10. The Return to Tangibility

The repricing of gold and silver will not only reshape portfolios; it will reorder priorities. As digital abstractions lose reliability, tangible assets will return to prominence, land, water rights, tools, family businesses, and skilled labor. These are the forms of capital that cannot be inflated or confiscated with a keystroke.

There will, however, be a lagging effect in real estate, one of the few areas where time will favor the patient. Property values move slower than metals because they depend on credit, not cash. As gold doubles in value over the coming years, real estate will not follow at the same pace. The housing market will likely experience a 12 to 36-month delay before prices fully adjust to the new purchasing power of hard assets. This period will be an enormous opportunity for those who held their metals through the storm. When the repricing wave reaches land and housing, those who preserved real wealth will be positioned to convert ounces into acres, purchasing real estate with gold that itself has already doubled in value. Timing, not speculation, will be the key.

Gold and silver will serve as bridges between the old world of credit and the new age of accountability. They are not ends in themselves but instruments of preservation, ballast for those navigating through deceitful seas. Those who hold them are not hoarders of metal but guardians of measurement.

For the prudent, this shift presents an opportunity: to re-align investments, households, and values around permanence rather than promise. For the reckless, it will be ruin. When paper wealth evaporates, those who mistook digits for dominion will discover they own nothing of substance.

11. Lessons from the Past

History offers precedents. In the 1970s, after a decade of monetary excess, gold rose from $35 to $850, a twenty-four-fold increase. In 2008–2011, after another orgy of liquidity, it doubled again. Each cycle was marked by the same pattern: crisis, stimulus, temporary calm, and a second, larger wave of repricing.

The current era is no different, except for scale. The global debt load now exceeds $250 trillion. Central banks are trapped by their own policies; they cannot tighten without collapse or loosen without admitting failure. In such an environment, honest money has nowhere to go but up.

Those who understand this pattern will not be surprised by the next surge. They will recognize it as the inevitable arithmetic of dishonesty coming due.

12. Stewardship and Preparation

The wise man does not buy gold because he fears apocalypse; he buys it because he respects arithmetic. He stores a portion of his labor in a form that cannot be debased by decree. He refuses to let others define his value.

Yet the greater preparation is moral. Wealth without wisdom is still poverty. The repricing ahead is not merely financial but spiritual, a test of stewardship. How one handles truth when the world trades in lies reveals character.

Households should seek strength in order: reduce unnecessary debt, build skills that outlast trends, and invest in things that serve life rather than vanity. Those principles were sound in the days of Solomon and remain sound today.

13. The Moral Repricing

Ultimately, gold and silver are mirrors, not messiahs. They reflect the integrity of the civilization that measures itself by them. When they rise sharply, it is not celebration but indictment. It means the people have lost faith in their stewards.

The “great repricing” is therefore not about metal, but about meaning. As false measures collapse, truth reclaims its proper premium. Those who anchor themselves to honesty, in finance, in family, in faith, will find stability while empires of credit crumble.

The ancient command still stands: “A false balance is abomination to the Lord: but a just weight is his delight.” (Proverbs 11:1)
When the world forgets that law, the market remembers it for Him.

Closing Reflection: The Weight of Truth

The years ahead will be noisy with policy, promises, and panic. Ignore them. Focus on weight and measure. In the end, the world will rediscover what every honest merchant once knew, that value is not created by decree but proven by durability.

Gold will find $4,000, silver will near $50, and then the cycle will repeat again (but with higher numbers). Yet the greater treasure is not metal, but the moral clarity to see through illusion.

Those who hold that, and live by it, will never be impoverished.

Health

Corona/Virus Treatment and Prevention

56 Comments

Last night I was handed a flyer by a good friend of mine originally written by a respiratory therapist that included some common sense things we can do to combat the Corona virus.

After reading the flyer I realized that many people simply were never taught many of the things that I once considered to be common knowledge. In addition many people are regularly administered treatments (often by medical professionals) that actually prolong or even worsen the flu/virus.

Using this handout as a guide whilst adding additional information I have learned over the years I have compiled a list of 10 helpful things every human should know and understand before making decisions about treating viral symptoms, and even preventing them.

Fevers

Fevers in general are irrationally feared by most people, mostly due to a lack of understanding exacerbated by liability concerns of medical professionals. When you contract a virus your bodies immune system identifies that intruder and destroys it while building specific anti-bodies to combat it better in the future.

The process of your immune system using good cells to attack and destroy the viral cells cause a release of energy. That energy is absorbed by the surrounding tissue and blood as heat thereby causing your overall body temperature to rise above “Normal” this is the root cause of fevers.

Viruses are also EXTREMELY sensitive to heat. The elevated body temperature (Fever) is very effective in killing the virus (even more effective than the immune system) . When we take pharmaceuticals such as Motrin, Tylenol, Advil, Excedrin and so forth we lower our body temperature allowing the virus to live longer while making it harder for our immune system to eradicate the virus.

It also helps to keep your house warm, wear multiple layers or cover up and stay warm. This will reduce the amount of energy your body needs to produce heat in combating the virus.

Obviously we should use common sense and treat a fever that exceeds a “safe” level. I personally never treat a fever with medication unless it is in excess of 103 degrees Fahrenheit and other methods such as a cool shower have failed.

Pharmaceuticals

Remember medications DO NOT in ANY way make you well or cure any viruses! Every medication merely relives or covers up symptoms. In most cases they only serve to prolong or even exacerbate the virus. Most medications cause more overall harm than good when used to treat viruses!

There certainly are specific cases where medication can be helpful in combating a virus but these cases should be the exception and not the norm.

Dehydration

Not drinking enough water and staying properly hydrated during the colder months is the primary cause of contracting viruses. It also greatly contributes to prolonging the course of a virus once contracted. Our cells need fresh water to combat the virus as well as process the waste.

When it’s hot outside everyone universally knows that you are easily dehydrated and should drink plenty of water. In addition viruses do not survive well outside the body in warmer temperatures. Most people do not realize we should be drinking at least the same amount in the winter. Cold temperatures extract nearly as much moisture from our bodies as hot, just consider what happens to uncovered meat in the freezer – it is completely dehydrated on a matter of days plus viruses survive much better in the cool weather.

Gatorade and other similar drinks work well for re-hydration if you are sick. These drinks have small amounts of real sugar as well at electrolytes. If you go to the hospital the first thing they will do is give you an IV with D5W (Sugar Water) and Saline. Gatorade is cheaper and doesn’t require an IV.

Humans are well equipped to defend ourselves from these viruses. We naturally breath through our noses where we have several lines of defense. First we have nose hair, then mucus in our nose and sinuses followed by our tonsils. All of these serve as filters to protect us from bacteria and viruses but they only function properly when we are well hydrated. When you do not drink enough water and your nose is dry viral cells are not filtered out and go straight to your lungs where it is very easy to enter the bloodstream.

Mucus is our primary filter. It’s sticky consistency filters out most naturally occurring contaminates such as viruses, The mucus ultimately ends up in our stomach where it is very difficult to enter the bloodstream. Most contaminates and all viruses that I am familiar with are easily killed by our stomach acid and processed as waste.

Help Your Body Fight

We were not intended to be primarily indoor creatures and we were certainly not intended to eat primarily processed and pre-packaged foods. Most people should be taking some basic supplements at ALL times. Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Zinc and Magnesium are the most important in my opinion. This can generally by accomplished with a simple multivitamin once a day. I doubt you will notice an immediate change but when you look back over the course of the year you will notice a trend of better overall health and far fewer sick days.

We all should eat considerably healthier on a regular basis but this is exceptionally important when we are sink. Our bodies have an amazing ability to heal themselves if we provide the nutrients necessary.

Keep Moving

This is one of the most important things we can do once we are sick. Move around, this keeps your blood circulating and helps to oxygenate your body. Keep your lungs moist – Take hot showers and breathe in as much steam as possible. Take repeated deep breaths. Chewing mint gum can help with bronchial dilation. Laying around in bed or the hospital is the primary cause of pneumonia. Try coughing into a moist towel, this helps break up phlegm in your lungs.

If anyone has addition tips please leave them in the comments and I will attempt to incorporate them into this blog

History, Irish, Social Topics

Irish Slave Trade

10 Comments

They came as slaves; vast human cargo transported on tall British ships bound for the Americas. They were shipped by the hundreds of thousands and included men, women, and even the youngest of children.

Whenever they rebelled or even disobeyed an order, they were punished in the harshest ways. Slave owners would hang their human property by their hands and set their hands or feet on fire as one form of punishment. They were burned alive and had their heads placed on pikes in the marketplace as a warning to other captives.

We don’t really need to go through all of the gory details, do we? We know all too well the atrocities of the African slave trade.

But, are we talking about African slavery? King James II and Charles I also led a continued effort to enslave the Irish. Britain’s famed Oliver Cromwell furthered this practice of dehumanizing one’s next door neighbor.

The Irish slave trade began when 30,000 Irish prisoners were sold as slaves to the New World. The King James I Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.

Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.

From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.

In 1641, Ireland’s population was 1,466,000 and in 1652, 616,000. According to Sir William Petty, 850,000 were wasted by the sword, plague, famine, hardship and banishment during the Confederation War 1641-1652. At the end of the war, vast numbers of Irish men, women and children were forcibly transported to the American colonies by the English government.(7) These people were rounded up like cattle, and, as Prendergast reports on Thurloe’s State Papers(8) (Pub. London, 1742), “In clearing the ground for the adventurers and soldiers (the English capitalists of that day)… To be transported to Barbados and the English plantations in America. It was a measure beneficial to Ireland, which was thus relieved of a population that might trouble the planters; it was a benefit to the people removed, which might thus be made English and Christians … a great benefit to the West India sugar planters, who desired men and boys for their bondsmen, and the women and Irish girls… To solace them.”(9)

J. Williams provides additional evidence of the attitude of the English government towards the Irish in an English law of June 26, 1657: “Those who fail to transplant themselves into Connaught (Ireland’s Western Province) or (County) Clare within six months… Shall be attained of high treason… Are to be sent into America or some other parts beyond the seas…”(10) Those thus banished who return are to “suffer the pains of death as felons by virtue of this act, without benefit of Clergy.”(11)

The following are but a few of the numerous references to those Irish transported against their will between 1651 and 1660.

Emmet asserts that during this time, more that

“100,000 young children who were orphans or had been taken from their Catholic parents, were sent abroad into slavery in the West Indies, Virginia and New England, that they might lose their faith and all knowledge of their nationality, for in most instances even their names were changed… Moreover, the contemporary writers assert between 20,000 and 30,000 men and women who were taken prisoner were sold in the American colonie as slaves, with no respect to their former station in life.”(12)

Dunn claims in Barbados the Irish Catholics constituted the largest block of servants on the island.(13) Higham estimated that in 1652 Barbados had absorbed no less than 12,000 of these political prisoners.(14) E. Williams reports: “In 1656 Cromwell’s Council of State voted that 1,000 Irish girls and 1,000 Irish young men be sent to Jamaica.”(15) Smith declares: “it is impossible to say how many shiploads of unhappy Irish were dispatched to America by the English government,” and “no mention of such shipments would be very likely to appear in the State Papers… They must have been very considerable in number.”(16)

Estimates vary between 80,000 and 130,000 regarding the amount of Irish sent into slavery in America and the West Indies during the years of 1651 – 1660: Prendergast says 80,000(17); Boudin 100,000(18); Emmet 120,000 to 130,000(19); Lingard 60,000 up until 1656(20); and Condon estimates “the number of Irish transported to the British colonies in America from 1651 – 1660 exceeded the total number of their inhabitants at that period, a fact which ought not to be lost sight of by those who undertake to estimate the strength of the Celtic element in this nation…”(21)

It is impossible to ascertain the exact number of those unfortunate victims of English injustice during this period, but we do know the amount was massive. Even though the figures given above are but estimates, they are estimates from eminent historians.

The flow of the Irish to the American colonies throughout the remainder of the 17th century was large and continuous, but not nearly as massive as between 1651 and 1660. Some of the many statements by historians give evidence of this Irish tide. Higham reports that in 1664 the Irish took the place of the French on St. Bartholomew’s.(22) Smith claims that during the four years leading up to 1675, already 500 Irish servants were brought to Jamaica by ships from Bristol, England that stopped in Ireland for provisions.(23) During 1680 on the Leeward Islands, Dunn posits: “with so many Irish Catholic servants and farmers… The English planters became obsessed with the fear of popery.”(24) Dunn also states that in Jamaica in 1685 the 2nd Duke of Aberlmarle, after his appointment by James II, a Catholic, mustered his chief support from the Irish Catholic small planters and servants and that the indentured servants who constituted the island militia were mainly Irish Catholic.(25) In reporting on Father Garganel’s statements, Lenihan claims: “in 1699 Father Garganel, S.J., Superior of the island of Martinique, asked for one or two Irish Fathers for that and the neighboring isles which were ‘fill of Irish’ for every year shiploads of men, boys and girls, partly crimped, partly carried off by main force for the purposes of slave trade, are conveyed by the English from Ireland.”(26)

During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.

Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.

African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.

In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves has a higher intelligence level than that of African slaves, brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.

England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean because the crew was low on food.

There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery much more in the 17th Century than the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry. In 1839, Britain finally decided on its own to end its participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded this particular chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.

But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong. Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, researching and not erasing from our memories.

But, where are our public (and PRIVATE) schools???? Where are the history books? Why is it so seldom discussed?

Do the memories of hundreds of thousands of Irish victims merit more than a mention from an unknown writer? Or is their story to be one that their English pirates intended: To (unlike the African book) have the Irish story utterly and completely disappear as if it never happened.

None of the Irish victims ever made it back to their homeland to describe their ordeal. These are the lost slaves; the ones that time and biased history books conveniently forgot.

Extensive content and references for this post provided by www.globalresearch.ca

Religion

Is it Acceptable for Christians to Pierce Their Bodies or Get Tattoos?

3 Comments

“Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.”
— Leviticus 19:28

We live in a culture obsessed with the body, with altering it, decorating it, mutilating it. The modern man wants to proclaim ownership of himself by etching ink into his skin and pushing metal through his flesh. The modern woman, deceived by vanity and rebellion, treats her body like a billboard for self-expression rather than a temple for God’s glory. The image of God has become a canvas for self-worship.

But what saith the Lord?

In an age when rebellion parades as freedom and defilement is called art, the Christian must once again ask: What does God say? What is righteous? What is holy? For those who walk in The Great Order, the answer must be clear, not according to trends, feelings, or peer approval, but rooted in the eternal Word of God.

I. God’s Prohibition in Leviticus – A Matter of Holiness, Not Just Ceremony

The foundational text is clear:

“Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.”
— Leviticus 19:28

This command was not arbitrary. It was given to separate the people of God from the surrounding pagan nations. The Canaanites, Egyptians, and other heathen peoples engaged in self-cutting and tattooing as acts of mourning, idol worship, tribal identification, and magical ritual. Tattoos and body piercings were, in origin, sacrificial and religious acts, outward signs of allegiance to false gods.

The people of Israel were called out, to be distinct. The commandment was not merely hygienic or cultural. It was holy. It was a declaration: You belong to YHWH, not Baal. You are set apart. You are mine.

Many modern Christians hastily dismiss this as “Old Testament law” with no relevance today. But they do so inconsistently. For the very same chapter (Leviticus 19) also condemns witchcraft (v. 26), prostitution (v. 29), and dishonoring the elderly (v. 32). Are these no longer sins? Shall we also affirm child prostitution or necromancy under the banner of “freedom in Christ”?

Some laws in the Torah were ceremonial and tied to temple practices, but others reflected unchanging moral principles rooted in the nature of God. Leviticus 19:28 falls into the latter. It reveals a divine standard: that the body is sacred and must not be defaced like those of the heathen.

II. The New Testament Confirms the Principle: The Body Is Not Our Own

“What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.”
— 1 Corinthians 6:19–20

This verse is not metaphorical poetry, it is doctrine. The believer has been purchased. Redeemed. His body is now a vessel of the Holy Spirit. A consecrated structure. It is not a personal art project; it is a sacred temple.

If we understand the weight of Paul’s words, the gravity of defiling the temple becomes clear. When Jesus drove out the moneychangers from the temple, it was not a small thing. He fashioned a whip. He overturned tables. He drove them out with righteous fury. Shall we now bring tattoo needles and nose rings into the temple of our bodies, claiming “Christian liberty”?

To glorify God with our bodies means we must not deface them. Solomon’s temple was not defiled with carvings of dragons and skulls. It was adorned with gold, with beauty, with order, all by God’s command. Likewise, our bodies are to reflect His glory, not our rebellion.

III. The Pagan Roots of Tattoos and Piercings

Historical research reveals that tattoos and body piercings have long been associated with idolatry, tribal paganism, and spiritual bondage.

  • In ancient Egypt, tattoos were linked to goddess worship, particularly Isis. Women often tattooed themselves as symbols of fertility rites.
  • In Canaanite culture, markings were made on the body to honor the dead or as initiation into pagan mysteries.
  • Roman soldiers tattooed themselves to signify loyalty to Caesar, a false god of the state.
  • In Polynesian tribal religion, tattooing was a rite of passage into adulthood, manhood, or spiritual transformation.
  • Hindu practices often include nose piercings for women, connected to marriage and spiritual significance under their gods.

The association between tattoos and paganism is not incidental. It is consistent. Throughout the centuries, the marks placed on the body were declarations of spiritual allegiance. What man inscribes on his body reveals what master he serves.

Is it any wonder that in the Bible, God’s people are forbidden from such markings, while the servants of Satan are described in Revelation as bearing the “mark of the beast”?

“And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads.”
— Revelation 13:16

IV. Scripture Calls Us to Be Set Apart

“As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance:
But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation;
Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.”
— 1 Peter 1:14–16

“Abstain from all appearance of evil.”
— 1 Thessalonians 5:22

“Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.”
— 2 Corinthians 6:17

Holiness is not simply inward. It is visible. Observable. Tangible. A Christian’s walk should reflect God’s order — and that includes his attire, his speech, his habits, and yes, even his body.

When you see a tattooed body, does it cry out “set apart” or does it whisper “blending in”?

Let’s be honest. The modern tattoo culture is not driven by piety. It is driven by rebellion, vanity, and worldliness. It is associated with rock stars, gang members, feminists, bikers, and those who boast in sin. Shall we, the holy nation, the peculiar people, the royal priesthood, adorn ourselves like them?

V. The Deception of “Christian Tattoos”

Some will say, “But my tattoo is a cross!” or “It’s a verse!” or “It’s meant to honor God!”

The question is not what the tattoo says. The question is whether the practice itself honors the God who forbids it.

Would a man honor the King by disobeying His law? Would a priest paint graffiti on the temple wall and justify it by claiming it says “God is love”? A tattoo of Scripture is still rebellion if God has commanded us not to mark our bodies.

Furthermore, we must not forget that Satan often disguises evil as light.

“And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.”
— 2 Corinthians 11:14

“Christian tattoos” are often just a baptized version of worldliness. A sanctified mask for self-expression. But righteousness is not about rebranding the ways of the world, it’s about rejecting them.

VI. The Problem of Piercings

While some argue that earrings or piercings are culturally neutral or even biblical, pointing to references of earrings in Genesis or Exodus, we must make a key distinction.

In Scripture, earrings are often:

  • Given as spoil (Genesis 35:4; Exodus 32:2),
  • Associated with idol worship (Judges 8:24–27),
  • Or connected with feminine adornment (Ezekiel 16:12).

They are never commanded, and they are never treated as holy or righteous. In fact, their connection with idolatry should give us pause.

More importantly, in our current age, the proliferation of piercings, in ears, noses, lips, navels, and beyond, is a sign of cultural breakdown and gender confusion. Men now wear earrings. Women pierce their faces in grotesque ways. The lines between male and female blur, and the image of God is vandalized.

For the man of God walking in the Great Order, and for the woman of God pursuing meekness and modesty, piercings are not a mark of virtue. They are marks of conformity to a dying and decadent world.

VII. Forgiveness and Restoration

What if you already have tattoos or piercings? Is all hope lost? God forbid.

“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”
— 1 John 1:9

The blood of Christ cleanses even the defiled temple. He forgives. He renews. But forgiveness is not a license to sin again. We do not presume upon grace.

Some tattoos cannot be removed, but they can be covered. Others may be a testimony, not of pride, but of repentance. The key is this: Do not justify the sin. Acknowledge it. Reject it. And do not repeat it.

VIII. Reason and Creation Affirm God’s Design

Let us conclude with simple reasoning and righteous deduction.

  • The body is the creation of God.
  • The body is the image of God.
  • The body is the temple of God.
  • The body is to be set apart from the world.

Therefore, it follows:

The Christian has no liberty to mutilate, mark, or desecrate his body according to his own whims or worldly fashion.

God did not make a mistake in your design. Your skin does not need improvement. As one Jewish rabbi once observed:

“No matter how well considered, a tattoo is the result of a short-term decision to decorate the body forever. What hubris to imagine that any of us, as individuals, can improve artistically on the original design of the Lord.”

Indeed. It is hubris. It is rebellion. It is a denial of God’s sufficiency.

IX. Let the People of God Be Holy

Let this be the cry of the remnant: We will not be marked by the world. We will not wear the badges of Babylon. We will be holy, consecrated, unpolluted.

Let the pagans ink their flesh. Let the rebels pierce their faces. Let the feminists defy God with rainbow tattoos. But let the people of the Great Order glorify God in body and spirit, which are His.

“Be ye not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind…”
— Romans 12:2

Conclusion:
Christians should not pierce their bodies or get tattoos. The weight of Scripture, the testimony of history, and the witness of creation all declare the same message: Your body is not your own. It is the Lord’s. Keep it holy.

Let us fear God. Let us obey His Word. Let us glorify Him with every fiber of our being, ink-free, metal-free, and set apart.

Soli Deo Gloria.
Let the Great Order rise.

Conspiracies, Holidays, Politics

The Truth About MLK

26 Comments

The Real Martin Luther King Jr:

Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy of adulation for the so-called “Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr.” King has even had a national holiday declared in his honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays — they share the generic-sounding “President’s Day.”) A liberal judge has sealed the FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let’s take a look at this modern-day plastic god.

Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time only as “Daddy King.” “Daddy King” named his son Michael. In 1935, “Daddy King” had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as “Martin Luther King” and to his son as “Martin Luther King, Jr.” None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. “Daddy” King’s son’s real name is to this day Michael King.

King’s Brazen Cheating:

We read in Michael Hoffman’s “Holiday for a Cheater “, The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled “Life is What You Make It,” according to the testimony of King’s best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams.

The first book that King wrote, “Stride Toward Freedom, – -was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow and no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of “The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- – (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff includes King’s widow Coretta), stated of King’s writings at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: “Judged retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism…. Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate study, systematic theology.”

King’s essay, “The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,” written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of “The Finding of God.”

Another of King’s theses, “Contemporary Continental Theology,” written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton.

King’s doctoral dissertation, “A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman,” for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer, “The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich’s Concept of God.”

According to “The Martin Luther King Papers”, in King’s dissertation “only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five or more words that were King’s own….”!

In “The Journal of American History”, June 1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that King’s wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating. (“King’s Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation,” The Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87)

Reading Garrow’s article, one is led to the inescapable conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89: “King’s academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost without exception little more than summary descriptions… and comparisons of other’s writings.

Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King’s professors did not expect more….” The editors of “The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers” state that “…the failure of King’s teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable….” But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us “…actually the malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was politically correct, he was Black, and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any wonder that it has taken forty years for the truth about King’s record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public.” Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King’s vision of a racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. From the “New York Times ” of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that, “There is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation.” However, despite its finding, the committee said that “No thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King’s doctoral degree,” an action the panel said “would serve no purpose.” No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful fraud as a student, the “reverend” and the “doctor” should be removed from King’s name.

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn’t really “Martin Luther King, Jr.” What’s left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people.

On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate demonstrations and riots. From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King’s associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist League at New York City College.

Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the “Los Angeles Times” reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter’s ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.

Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized the first of King’s famous marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist Party, “The Worker,- – openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left King’s employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1963. Bayard Rustin’s replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King was Jack O’Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O’Dell. According to official records, in 1962 Jack O’Dell was a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O’Dell was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis “Globe-Democrat – -of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O’Dell’s party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired O’Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare, “immediately hired him again- – as director of the New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the “Richmond News-Leader – -of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King’s 1963 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King’s movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts to the southern US, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title “Radio Free Dixie.” In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks against White Americans. During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled “Negroes With Guns.” The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than Martin Luther King, Jr. It is also interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

According to King’s biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, “King privately described himself as a Marxist.” In his 1981 book, “The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.”, Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, “…we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution…. The whole structure of American life must be changed…. We are engaged in the class struggle.” Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King’s behind-the-scenes “handler.” Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King’s mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King’s more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King’s book, “Stride Toward Freedom.” It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King’s income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King’s speeches. King described Levison as one of his “closest friends.

FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money

The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of Stanley Levison’s Communist activities. It was Levison’s close association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in King. Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media’s lie about “racists” in the FBI being out to “get” King, you should be aware that the man most responsible for the FBI’s probe of King was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal, and says that initially “I was one hundred per cent for King…because I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader for the Black people in their desire for civil rights.” The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions about King’s Communist beliefs and associations, but it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.

According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the “civil rights” movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours. In fact, an outfit called The National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was shot, has declined to depict in any way the “occupants – -of those rooms. That “according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhold “would be “close to blasphemy.” The reason? Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. spent his last night on Earth having sex with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a third.

Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years with the Bureau had seen everything there was to be seen of the seamy side of life, King was one of only seven people he had ever encountered who was such a total degenerate. Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King’s supposedly “non-violent” marches, Sullivan’s probe revealed a very different King from the carefully crafted public image. King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of violence. King’s only admonition on the subject was that they should embrace “tactical nonviolence.” Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually working for the FBI. J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information on King’s Communist connections was provided to the President and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was also provided to major newspapers and news wire services. But were the American people informed of King’s real nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the fix was in “the controlled media and the bought politicians were bound and determined to push their racial mixing program on America.

King was their man and nothing was going to get in their way. With a few minor exceptions, these facts have been kept from the American people. The pro-King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that a serious proposal has been made to add some of King’s writings as a new book in the Bible. Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of this man called King. I want you to start to think for yourselves. I want you to consider this: What are the forces and motivation behind the controlled media’s active promotion of King? What does it tell you about our politicians when you see them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to honor King as a national hero? What does it tell you about our society when any public criticism of this moral leper and Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal?

What does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie? You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to wake up.

Sources:

1. The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- – (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change).

2. “King’s Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation,” The Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87) David J. Garrow

3. New York Times” of October 11, 1991, page 15.

4. “The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.”, David J. Garrow, (1981). 5. “And the walls came tumbling down,” Rev. Ralph Abernathy (1989)

1 … 13 14 15 16